Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nonlinear behavior of connections in RCS frames with bracing and steel plate shear wall

  • Received : 2016.06.26
  • Accepted : 2016.11.11
  • Published : 2016.11.20
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Steel systems composed of Reinforced Concrete column to Steel beam connection (RCS) have been raised as a structural system in the past few years. The optimized combination of steel-concrete structural elements has the advantages of both systems. Through beam and through column connections are two main categories in RCS systems. This study includes finite-element analyses of mentioned connection to investigate the seismic performance of RCS connections. The finite element model using ABAQUS software has been verified with experimental results of a through beam type connection tested in Taiwan in 2005. According to verified finite element model a parametric study has been carried out on five RCS frames with different types of lateral restraint system. The main objective of this study is to investigate the forming of plastic hinges, distribution of stresses, ductility and stiffness of these models. The results of current research showed good performance of composite systems including concrete column-steel beam in combination with steel shear wall and bracing system, are very desirable. The results show that the linear stiffness of models with X bracing and steel shear wall increase remarkably and their ultimate strength increase about three times rather than other RCS frames.

Keywords

References

  1. Abaqus (2010), Abaqus analysis user's manual, Version 6.10, Dassault Systems.
  2. AISC 360-10 (2010), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, Chicago, IL USA.
  3. Alizadeh, S., Attari, N.K.A. and Kazemi, M.T. (2013), "The seismic performance of new detailing for RCS connections", J. Construct. Steel Res., 91, 76-88 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.08.010
  4. Bazzaz, M., Kheyroddin, A., Kafi, M.A. and Andalib, Z. (2012), "Evaluation of the seismic performance of off-centre bracing system with ductile element in steel frames", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 12(5), 445-464. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2012.12.5.445
  5. Bazzaz, M., Andalib, Z., Kheyroddin, A. and Kafi, M.A. (2015), "Numerical comparison of the seismic performance of steel rings in off-centre bracing system and diagonal bracing system", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 19(4), 917-937. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.4.917
  6. Cao, P., Feng, N. and Wu, K. (2014), "Experimental study on in-filled frames strengthened by profiled steel sheet bracing", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 17(6), 777-790. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.17.6.777
  7. Cheng, C.T. and Chen, C.C. (2005), "Seismic behavior of steel beam and reinforced concrete column connections", J. Construct. Steel Res., 61(5), 587-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2004.09.003
  8. ENV1992-1-1 (1991), Eurocode-2: Design of concrete structures, Part 1: General rules and rules for building, Brussels, Belgium.
  9. FEMA-356 (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Washington.
  10. Jafar Ramaji, I. and Mofid, M. (2012), "On the characteristics and seismic study of Hat Knee Bracing system, in steel structures", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 13(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2012.13.1.001
  11. Kanno, R. (1993), "Strength, deformation, and seismic resistance of joints between steel beams and reinforced concrete columns", Ph.D. Dissertation; Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
  12. Kim, K. and Noguchi, H. (1998), "A study on the ultimate shear strength of connections with RC columns and steel beams", J. Struct. Construct. Eng., 507, 163-169.
  13. Li, W., Li, Q.N., Jiang, L. and Jiang, W.S. (2011), "Seismic performance of composite reinforced concrete and steel moment frame structures-state-of-the-art", Compos. Part B: Eng., 42(2), 190-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.10.008
  14. Li, W., Li, Q.N. and Jiang, W.S. (2012), "Parameter study on composite frames consisting of steel beams and reinforced concrete columns", J. Construct. Steel Res., 77, 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.04.007
  15. Noguchi, H. and Uchida, K. (2004), "Finite element method analysis of hybrid structural frames with reinforced concrete columns and steel beams", J. Struct. Eng., 130(2), 328-335. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:2(328)
  16. Parra-Montesinos, G. and Wight, J.K. (2000), "Seismic response of exterior RC column-to-steel beam connections", J. Struct. Eng., 126(10), 1113-1121. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1113)
  17. Parra-Montesinos, G. and Wight, J.K. (2001), "Modeling shear behavior of hybrid RCS beam-column connections", J. Struct. Eng., 127(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:1(3)
  18. Parra-Montesinos, G. and Wight, J.K. (2003), "Towards deformation-based capacity design of RCS beam-column connections", Eng. Struct., 25(5), 681-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00177-3
  19. Sheikh, T.M., Deierlein, G.G., Yura, J.A. and Jirsa, J.O. (1989), "Beam-column moment connections for composite frames: part 1", J. Struct. Eng., 115(11), 2858-2876. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:11(2858)
  20. Xu, L., Fan, X., Lu, D. and Li, Zh. (2016), "Hysteretic behavior studies of self-centering energy dissipation Bracing system", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 20(6), 1205-1219. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.20.6.1205

Cited by

  1. Local, Story, and Global Ductility Evaluation for Complex 2D Steel Buildings: Pushover and Dynamic Analysis vol.9, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010200
  2. Numerical evaluation of ductility and energy absorption of steel rings constructed from plates vol.169, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.034
  3. Seismic Behavior and Study of RCS Composite Frame Composed of Steel Beams and Strong Concrete Column vol.15, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2019-0018
  4. Numerical Evaluation on Improvement Performance of Waved Connection to Reduce Damage on Buried Gas Pipeline vol.2020, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6680384
  5. Fundamental Investigation on Seismic Retrofitting Method of Aging Concrete Structural Wall Using Carbon Fiber Sheet-Constitutive Law of Rectangular Section vol.2020, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8451043
  6. On the behaviour of steel CBF for industrial buildings subjected to seismic sequences vol.28, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.10.050
  7. Mechanical property test and analysis on the main body frame structure of electrical dust precipitator vol.26, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-707620210002.1290
  8. Damage effect of steel circular tube subjected to fire and blast vol.176, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106389
  9. Performance Assessment of Shockwaves of Chute Spillways in Large Dams vol.2021, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6634086
  10. Investigation of Mechanical Properties of Concrete Containing Liquid Silicone Rubber Under Axial Loads vol.2021, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6637625
  11. Shear Resistance Contribution of Constituent Elements Consisting RCS Joint vol.2021, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3958247
  12. Seismic progressive collapse mitigation of buildings using cylindrical friction damper vol.20, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.1.001
  13. Upgraded parameter model of frame pin‐supported wall structures vol.30, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1852
  14. Numerical Study on Performance of Prefabricated RCS Joint under Normal Temperature and Fire vol.25, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-2118-y
  15. Hysteretic Behavior on Asymmetrical Composite Joints with Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Columns and Unequal High Steel Beams vol.13, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13122381