한국방사선학회논문지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology)

  • 제10권8호
  • /
  • Pages.583-590
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1976-0620(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0633(eISSN)
한국방사선학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

원전주변 갑상선암 발병 피해 소송 사건 이후 원자력에 대한 지역주민 인식 분석

Local Residents' Perception Analysis of Nuclear Power after the Thyroid Cancer Damage Lawsuit Adjacent to the Nuclear Plant

  • 이재헌 (한국수력원자력 신고리 제1발전소 방사선안전팀) ;
  • 김정훈 (부산가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학 방사선학과)
  • Lee, Jae-Heon (Radiation Safety Team, Shin-Kori Nuclear Plant #1 of KHNP) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Hoon (Department of Radiological Science, College of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Pusan)
  • 투고 : 2016.10.31
  • 심사 : 2016.12.31
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 부산광역시 거주민을 대상으로 원전주변 갑상선암 피해 소송 이후 원자력발전소 인근지역과 시내권에 거주하는 주민간의 인식 차이를 분석하여 국민들의 원자력에 대한 수용성 수준을 판별하고자 하였다. 설문조사는 총 551명(원전인근지역 269명, 시내권 282명)을 대상으로 대인면접을 통해 이루어졌으며, 분석 결과, 원전 주변 갑상선암 발병 피해 소송 사건을 계기로 국민들의 원자력에 대한 인식에 변화가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 원전인근지역 주민의 경우 사건 이후 원자력에 대한 불신과 불안감이 높아져, 원자력에 대한 부정적 인식이 강해졌음을 확인할 수 있었다. 반면 시내권 주민들은 원전 주변 갑상선암 발병 피해 소송 사건에도 불구하고 사건 이전보다 더욱 원자력 수용성에 긍정적인 인식을 갖는 것으로 분석되었다. 그러나 원자력 안전성과 신뢰성에 대한 인식은 부정적인 것으로 분석되어 원자력 수용성과 상반되는 이중적인 인식을 보였다. 이는 부산광역시 시내권 주민들의 경우 원자력의 편익, 필요성 등을 원칙적으로 인정하나 안전성에 대해서는 의심하는 것으로 판단되며 향후 원자력의 이용 확대를 지속적으로 추진하기 위해서는 국민의 올바른 이해와 신뢰 그리고 무엇보다 국민 또는 원전인근지역 주민들과 충분한 의사소통이 필요하다고 사료된다.

The subjects in this study are the residents of Busan, analyzing the perception gap between the residents adjacent to the nuclear plant and living in town, about the lawsuit of thyroid cancer damage nearby the nuclear plant, to distinguish the citizen's acceptance level about the nuclear power. 551 people(269 people adjacent to nuclear plant, 282 people in town) were face-to-face surveyed and the result showed that people's perceptions of the nuclear power has changed after the thyroid cancer damage lawsuit. In the case of the residents adjacent to the nuclear plant, it became clear that the negative perception of nuclear power became stronger due to increasing distrust and anxiety about nuclear power after the lawsuit of thyroid cancer damage nearby the nuclear plant. On the other hand, people living in town showed their positive perceptions of nuclear power despite the thyroid cancer damage lawsuit. However, two-sided perception was shown compared to the acceptance of nuclear power, since the safety and reliability of the nuclear power was analyzed as negative perception. Therefore, for the constant increased use of nuclear power in the future, national understanding and credibility, including the communication with the nation or the residents in the neighboring area of nuclear power plant, will be necessary.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. J. Y. Jeong, "Public Acceptance Change of Nuclear Power after the Fukushima Nuclear Accident", The Second Half of Symposium of the Korean Association for policy Studies, Vol.1, No 1, pp. 157-177, 2011
  2. I. S. Kim, "Risk Perception and Perceived Knowledge of Nuclear Power, Usage of Communication Channel, Influence of the Third-Person Effect on Optimistic Prejudice: Focusing on Fukushima Nuclear Accident", Journal of Communication Science, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 79-106, 2012.
  3. J. S. Wang, "Exploratory Analysis of the Change of Nuclear Power Acceptance and Perception Structure after Fukushima Nuclear Accident", Korean Public Administration Review, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 395-424, 2013.
  4. Korea Nuclear Energy Agency, "Survey on People's Recognition of Nuclear Energy", 2012.
  5. H. J. Seo, "The Fukushima Nuclear Accident and People's Negative Perception of Nuclear Energy", Institute of Governmental Studies, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 321-361, 2013.
  6. S. Y. Kim, "Analyzation of Change of Attitude about the World's Nuclear Acceptance after the Fukushima Nuclear Accident", Journal of the Korean Association for policy Studies, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 57-90, 2014.
  7. Y. J. Cha, "The Change Pattern of Nuclear Risk Perception and Political Implication: Focusing on General Residence in the Capital Area", Journal of Korean Policy Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1-20, 2012.
  8. Y. S. Jeon, "Circumstantial Decision-Making Analysis about the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Explosion Accident", Japanese Modern Study, Vol. 36, pp. 315-339, 2012.
  9. H. R. Song, W. J. Kim, "Effects of Risk Perception on Risk Attitude and Risk Acceptance of Nuclear Power Plants", Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 238-248, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.06.238
  10. Korean Association for Radiation Protection, "Scientific Analysis of the Residents adjacent to Nuclear Plants and the occur of Thyroid Cancer", 2015.
  11. The Kookmin Daily's Nuclear Spacial Coverage Team, "What is Nuclear to Us", 2015
  12. Y. G. Kim, "A Study on Obtaining the Public Acceptance of Nuclear Power for Conflict Resolution", Dispute Resolution Studies Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 41-76, 2015. https://doi.org/10.16958/drsr.2015.13.2.41
  13. S. K. Jo, "Public Sphere of After-Use Nuclear Fuel Management Issue and a View on the Conflict Structure", Journal of Radioactive Waste, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 49-62, 2009.
  14. J. R. Lee, "Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Explosion Accident and Social Communication," A Speech and Communication, Vol. 16, pp.188-213, 2011.
  15. Y. J. Kang, "The Nuclear Accident and Risk Communication, Politics of Expertise: Focusing on the Fukushima Nuclear Accident", Journal of Engineering Education Research, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 35-44, 2012.
  16. K. Y. Jo, "Survey on Nuclear Power Perceptions of Residents Adjacent to Nuclear Power Plants", Journal of Radioactive Waste, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 181-189, 2011. https://doi.org/10.7733/jkrws.2011.9.3.181
  17. Nuclear Safety And Security Commission, " Nuclear Installation's Protection and Radioactivity Protection Against Disasters", Legislation No. 133544 Article 20 of Paragraph 2(Set of Public Evacuation District), 2015.
  18. J. B. Park, "Investigation of Nuclear Business Acceptance Change between Nuclear Energy Employee and General Public: Focusing on Fukushima Nuclear Accident", KAIST Master's Degree Essay, 2011.
  19. J. H. Kim, "Perception Analysis on Radiation and Nuclear Plant after the Fukushima Nuclear Accident", Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Vol. 13, No. 9, pp. 281-287, 2013.
  20. C. H. Lim, "The Nuclear Power Corruption's Negative Effects and Analysis on Matter of Trust", The Korea Public Administration Journal, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 131-159, 2014.
  21. G. D. Lee, "Survey on Public's Perception of Nuclear Power", Korea Energy Economics Institute, Research Report, 2011.
  22. Sungkyunkwan University Survey Research Center, "Perceptions and Attitudes of Local Residents about Nuclear Power Generation", 2003.
  23. T. J. Kim, "Perception Analysis on Nuclear Power's Social Risks", The Korea Spatial Planning Review, No. 55, pp. 41-58, 2007.
  24. W. D. Hwang, "A Study of Factors Influencing Nuclear Power's Social Acceptance", Kyung Hee University Graduate Master's Degree Essay, 2013.

피인용 문헌

  1. 원자력발전소와 갑상선암 논란 이후 원자력에 대한 인식 조사 vol.11, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2017.11.1.19
  2. 방사선사고와 테러에 대한 경찰의 대응 인식에 관한 연구 vol.11, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2017.11.7.647
  3. 일부 부산지역 주민의 원자력에 대한 생각과 불안감의 관계 vol.13, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12811/kshsm.2019.13.3.137