Advances in Computational Design

  • 제1권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-25
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2383-8477(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-0523(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Topology and geometry optimization of different types of domes using ECBO

  • Kaveh, A. (Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Rezaei, M. (Road, Building and Housing Research Center)
  • 투고 : 2015.07.21
  • 심사 : 2015.10.14
  • 발행 : 2016.01.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Domes are architectural and elegant structures which cover a vast area with no interrupting columns in the middle, and with suitable shapes can be also economical. Domes are built in a wide variety of forms and specialized terms are available to describe them. According to their form, domes are given special names such as network, lamella, Schwedler, ribbed, and geodesic domes. In this paper, an optimum topology design algorithm is performed using the enhanced colliding bodies optimization (ECBO) method. The network, lamella, ribbed and Schwedler domes are studied to determine the optimum number of rings, the optimum height of crown and tubular sections of these domes. The minimum volume of each dome is taken as the objective function. A simple procedure is defined to determine the dome structures configurations. This procedure includes calculating the joint coordinates and element constructions. The design constraints are implemented according to the provision of LRFD-AISC (Load and Resistance Factor Design-American Institute of Steel Constitution). The wind loading act on domes according to ASCE 7-05 (American Society of Civil Engineers). This paper will explore the efficiency of various type of domes and compare them at the first stage to investigate the performance of these domes under different kind of loading. At the second stage the wind load on optimum design of domes are investigated for Schwedler dome. Optimization process is performed via ECBO algorithm to demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the ECBO in creating optimal design for domes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) (1989), Manual of Steel Construction Allowable Stress Design, 9th ed. Chicago, AISC, USA.
  2. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2006), Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures (ASCE-SEI 7-05).
  3. Babaei, M. and Sheidaei, M. (2013), "Optimal design of double layers scallop domes using genetic algorithm", Appl. Math. Model., 37(4), 2127-2138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.04.053
  4. Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V. and Colorni, A. (1996), "The ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents", IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. B, 26(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.484436
  5. Eberhart, R.C. and Kennedy, J. (1995), "A new optimizer using particle swarm theory", Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, Nagoya, Japan.
  6. Erol, O.K. and Eksin, I. (2006), "New optimization method: Big Bang-Big Crunch", Adv. Eng. Softw., 37(2), 106-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2005.04.005
  7. Fogel, L.J., Owens, A.J. and Walsh, M.J. (1966), Artificial Intelligence through Simulated Evolution, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
  8. Goncalves, M.S., Lopez, R.H. and Miguel, L.F.F. (2015), "Search group algorithm: A new metaheuristic method for the Optimization of truss structures", Comput. Struct., 153, 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.03.003
  9. Holland, J.H. (1975), Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, USA.
  10. Kamyab, R. and Salajegheh, E. (2013), "Size optimization of nonlinear scallop domes by an enhanced particle swarm algorithm", Int. J. Civ. Eng., 11(2), 77-89.
  11. Kaveh, A. and Forhoudi, N. (2013), "A new optimization method: dolphin echolocation", Adv. Eng. Softw., 59, 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.03.004
  12. Kaveh, A. and Ilchi Ghazaan, M. (2014a), "Enhanced colliding bodies optimization for design problems with continuous and discrete variables", Adv. Eng. Softw., 77, 66-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.08.003
  13. Kaveh, A. and Ilchi Ghazaan, M. (2014b), "Computer codes for colliding bodies optimization and its enhanced version", Int. J. Optim. Civ. Eng., 4(3), 321-332.
  14. Kaveh, A. and Khayatazad, M. (2012), "A novel meta-heuristic method: ray optimization", Comput. Struct., 112-113, 283-294.
  15. Kaveh, A. and Mahdavai, V.R. (2014a), "Colliding bodies optimization: a novel meta-heuristic method", Comput. Struct., 39, 18-27.
  16. Kaveh, A. and Mahdavi, V.R. (2014b), "Colliding bodies optimization method for optimum design of truss structures with continuous variables", Adv. Eng. Softw., 70, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.01.002
  17. Kaveh, A. and Mahdavi, V.R. (2015), Colliding Bodies Optimization; Extensions and Applications, Springer Verlag, Switzerland.
  18. Kaveh, A. and Talatahari, S. (2009), "Size optimization of space trusses using Big Bang-Big Crunch algorithm", Comput. Struct., 87(17-18), 1129-1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.04.011
  19. Kaveh, A. and Talatahari, S. (2010a), "A novel heuristic optimization method: charged system search", Acta Mech., 213(3-4), 267-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-009-0270-4
  20. Kaveh, A. and Talatahari, S. (2010b), "Optimal design of Schwedler and ribbed domes via hybrid Big Bang- Big Crunch algorithm", J. Construct. Steel Res., 66(3), 412-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.10.013
  21. Kaveh, A. and Talatahari, S. (2010c), "Optimal design of single layer domes using meta-heuristic algorithms; a comparative study", Int. J. Space Struct., 25(4), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1260/0266-3511.25.4.217
  22. Kaveh, A. and Talatahari, S. (2011), "Geometry and topology optimization of geodesic domes using charged system search", Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 43(2), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0566-y
  23. Kociecki, M. and Adeli, H. (2013), "Two-phase genetic algorithm for size optimization of free-form steel space frame roof structures", J. Construct. Steel Res., 90, 283-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.07.027
  24. Mirjalili, S. (2015), "The ant lion optimizer", Adv. Eng. Softw., 83, 80-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.010
  25. Rao, R.V., Savsani, V.J. and Vakharia, D.P. (2011), "Teaching-learning-based optimization: A novel method for constrained mechanical design optimization problems", Comput. Aided Des., 43(3), 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2010.12.015
  26. Sadollah, A., Eskandar, H., Bahreininejad, A. and Kim, J.H. (2015), "Water cycle, mine blast and improved mine blast algorithms for discrete sizing optimization of truss structures", Comput. Struct., 149, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.12.003
  27. Saka, M.P. (2007), "Optimum geometry design of geodesic domes using harmony search algorithm", Adv. Struct. Eng., 10(6), 595-606. https://doi.org/10.1260/136943307783571445
  28. Saka, M.P. and Geem, Z.W. (2013), "Mathematical and met heuristic applications in design optimization of steel frame structures: an extensive review", Math. Prob. Eng., Article ID 271031, 33 pages.
  29. Wenzhheng, L. and Jihong, Y. (2014), "Collapse optimization for domes under earthquake using a genetic simulated annealing algorithm", J. Constr. Steel Res., 97, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.01.015

피인용 문헌

  1. Optimal dome design considering member-related design constraints vol.13, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0543-5
  2. A Comparative Study of the Structural Performance of Different Types of Reticulated Dome Subjected to Distributed Loads vol.6, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00056