DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of midpalatal miniscrew-assisted maxillary molar distalization patterns with simultaneous use of fixed appliances: A preliminary study

  • Mah, Su-Jung (Department of Orthodontics, Dental Hospital, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Eun (Department of Orthodontics, Dental Hospital, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong) ;
  • Ahn, Eun Jin (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Nam, Jong-Hyun (Private Practice) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Young (Private Practice) ;
  • Kang, Yoon-Goo (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
  • Received : 2015.08.20
  • Accepted : 2015.11.17
  • Published : 2016.01.25

Abstract

Skeletal anchorage-assisted upper molar distalization has become one of the standard treatment modalities for the correction of Class II malocclusion. The purpose of this study was to analyze maxillary molar movement patterns according to appliance design, with the simultaneous use of buccal fixed orthodontic appliances. The authors devised two distinct types of midpalatal miniscrew-assisted maxillary molar distalizers, a lingual arch type and a pendulum type. Fourteen patients treated with one of the two types of distalizers were enrolled in the study, and the patterns of tooth movement associated with each type were compared. Pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalograms were analyzed. The lingual arch type was associated with relatively bodily upper molar distalization, while the pendulum type was associated with distal tipping with intrusion of the upper molar. Clinicians should be aware of the expected tooth movement associated with each appliance design. Further well designed studies with larger sample sizes are required.

Keywords

References

  1. Bolla E, Muratore F, Carano A, Bowman SJ. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods. Angle Orthod 2002;72:481-94.
  2. Burhan AS. Combined treatment with headgear and the Frog appliance for maxillary molar distalization: a randomized controlled trial. Korean J Orthod 2013;43:101-9. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.2.101
  3. Fuziy A, Rodrigues de Almeida R, Janson G, Angelieri F, Pinzan A. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:502-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.031
  4. Patel MP, Janson G, Henriques JF, de Almeida RR, de Freitas MR, Pinzan A, et al. Comparative distalization effects of Jones jig and pendulum appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:336-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.035
  5. Sugawara J, Kanzaki R, Takahashi I, Nagasaka H, Nanda R. Distal movement of maxillary molars in nongrowing patients with the skeletal anchorage system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:723-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.036
  6. Nur M, Bayram M, Celikoglu M, Kilkis D, Pampu AA. Effects of maxillary molar distalization with Zygoma-Gear Appliance. Angle Orthod 2012;82:596-602. https://doi.org/10.2319/091611-595.1
  7. Sa'aed NL, Park CO, Bayome M, Park JH, Kim Y, Kook YA. Skeletal and dental effects of molar distalization using a modified palatal anchorage plate in adolescents. Angle Orthod 2015;85:657-64. https://doi.org/10.2319/060114-392.1
  8. Kang YG, Kim JY, Nam JH. Control of maxillary dentition with 2 midpalatal orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:879-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.040
  9. Oh Y, Park HS, Kwon TG. Treatment effects of microimplant-aided sliding mechanics on distal retraction of posterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:470-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.05.037
  10. Venkateswaran S, George AM, Anand M, Devi VS, Vora SR, Krishnaswamy N. Skeletal anchorage using mini-implants in the maxillary tuberosity region. J Ind Orthod Soc 2013;47:217-24.
  11. Cozzani M, Pasini M, Zallio F, Ritucci R, Mutinelli S, Mazzotta L, et al. Comparison of maxillary molar distalization with an implant-supported distal jet and a traditional tooth-supported distal jet appliance. Int J Dent 2014;2014:937059.
  12. Kircelli BH, Pektas ZO, Kircelli C. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance. Angle Orthod 2006;76:650-9.
  13. Polat-Ozsoy O, Kircelli BH, Arman-Ozcirpici A, Pektas ZO, Uckan S. Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:339.e9-17.
  14. Kwon HY, Mah SJ, Kang YG. Asymmetric transverse control of maxillary dentition with two midpalatal orthodontic miniscrews. Angle Orthod 2015;85:525-34. https://doi.org/10.2319/042514-302.1
  15. Hilgers JJ. The pendulum appliance for Class II non-compliance therapy. J Clin Orthod 1992;26:706-14.
  16. Cha BK, Ngan P. Skeletal anchorage for orthopedic correction of growing Class III patients. Semin Orthod 2011;17:124-37. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2010.12.005
  17. Kang YG, Kim JY, Lee YJ, Chung KR, Park YG. Stability of mini-screws invading the dental roots and their impact on the paradental tissues in beagles. Angle Orthod 2009;79:248-55. https://doi.org/10.2319/122007-413.1
  18. Kim YH, Yang SM, Kim S, Lee JY, Kim KE, Gianelly AA, et al. Midpalatal miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: factors affecting clinical success. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:66-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.036
  19. Park J, Cho HJ. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:314.e1-12; discussion 314-5.
  20. Lee J, Miyazawa K, Tabuchi M, Sato T, Kawaguchi M, Goto S. Effectiveness of en-masse retraction using midpalatal miniscrews and a modified transpalatal arch: Treatment duration and dentoskeletal changes. Korean J Orthod 2014;44:88-95. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2014.44.2.88
  21. Oncag G, Seckin O, Dincer B, Arikan F. Osseointegrated implants with pendulum springs for maxillary molar distalization: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:16-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.034
  22. Bussick TJ, McNamara JA Jr. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:333-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70238-1
  23. Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 1: Clinical and radiological evaluation. Angle Orthod 1997;67:249-60.
  24. Sar C, Kaya B, Ozsoy O, Ozcirpici AA. Comparison of two implant-supported molar distalization systems. Angle Orthod 2013;83:460-7. https://doi.org/10.2319/080512-630.1

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness for Insertion of Orthodontic Mini-Implants in Adults and Adolescents vol.28, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000003906
  2. Maxillary total arch distalization using midpalatal mini-implant: Case report vol.41, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.21851/obr.41.03.201709.158
  3. A comparison of treatment effects of total arch distalization using modified C-palatal plate vs buccal miniscrews vol.88, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2319/061917-406.1
  4. Corrosion of laser-welded stainless steel orthodontic wires vol.77, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.odw.2017.12.004
  5. 골격고정원을 이용한 Pendulum 장치가 두개 안면의 수직적 요소에 미치는 효과 분석 vol.34, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.1.10
  6. Asymmetric extractions in a patient with a hopeless maxillary central incisor, followed by treatment with mini-implant anchorage vol.153, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.12.033
  7. Comparación del grosor óseo palatino bilateral para inserción de miniimplantes vol.9, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15446/aoc.v9n2.78843
  8. Long-term stability of miniscrew anchored maxillary molar distalization in Class II treatment vol.90, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.2319/051619-335.1
  9. Palatal temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs): What to know and how to do? vol.24, pp.suppl, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12451