Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제10권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-23
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on seismic retrofit of structures using SPSW systems and LYP steel material

  • Zirakian, Tadeh (Department of Civil Engineering and Construction Management, California State University) ;
  • Zhang, Jian (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California)
  • 투고 : 2015.01.07
  • 심사 : 2015.11.27
  • 발행 : 2016.01.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Steel plate shear walls (SPSWs) have been shown to be efficient lateral force-resisting systems, which are increasingly used in new and retrofit construction. These structural systems are designed with either stiffened and stocky or unstiffened and slender web plates based on disparate structural and economical considerations. Based on some limited reported studies, on the other hand, employment of low yield point (LYP) steel infill plates with extremely low yield strength, and high ductility as well as elongation properties is found to facilitate the design and improve the structural behavior and seismic performance of the SPSW systems. On this basis, this paper reports system-level investigations on the seismic response assessment of multi-story SPSW frames under the action of earthquake ground motions. The effectiveness of the strip model in representing the behaviors of SPSWs with different buckling and yielding properties is primarily verified. Subsequently, the structural and seismic performances of several code-designed and retrofitted SPSW frames with conventional and LYP steel infill plates are investigated through detailed modal and nonlinear time-history analyses. Evaluation of various seismic response parameters including drift, acceleration, base shear and moment, column axial load, and web-plate ductility demands, demonstrates the capabilities of SPSW systems in improving the seismic performance of structures and reveals various advantages of use of LYP steel material in seismic design and retrofit of SPSW systems, in particular, application of LYP steel infill plates of double thickness in seismic retrofit of conventional steel and code-designed SPSW frames.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AISC 341-10 (2010), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.
  2. ANSYS 14.0 (2011), ANSYS 14.0 documentation, ANSYS Inc.
  3. ASCE 7-10 (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
  4. Baldvins, N.M., Berman, J.W., Lowes, L.N., Janes, T.M. and Low, N.A. (2012), "Fragility functions for steel plate shear walls", Earthq. Spectra, 28(2), 405-426. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000003
  5. Berman, J.W. (2011), "Seismic behavior of code designed steel plate shear walls", Eng. Struct., 33(1), 230-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.10.015
  6. Berman, J.W. and Bruneau, M. (2005), "Experimental investigation of light-gauge steel plate shear walls", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 131(2), 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:2(259)
  7. Bhowmick, A.K. (2009), "Seismic analysis and design of steel plate shear walls", Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta.
  8. Bhowmick, A.K., Driver, R.G. and Grondin, G.Y. (2009), "Seismic analysis of steel plate shear walls considering strain rate and P-delta effects", J. Constr. Steel Res., 65(5), 1149-1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.08.003
  9. Bhowmick, A.K., Grondin, G.Y. and Driver, R.G. (2011), "Estimating fundamental periods of steel plate shear walls", Eng. Struct., 33(6), 1883-1893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.010
  10. Caccese, V., Elgaaly, M. and Chen, R. (1993), "Experimental study of thin steel-plate shear walls under cyclic load", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 119(2), 573-587. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:2(573)
  11. Chen, S.J. and Jhang, C. (2006), "Cyclic behavior of low yield point steel shear walls", Thin-Wall. Struct., 44(7), 730-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2006.08.002
  12. Chen, S.J. and Jhang, C. (2011), "Experimental study of low-yield-point steel plate shear wall under in-plane load", J. Constr. Steel Res., 67(6), 977-985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.01.011
  13. Dung, P.N. (2011), "Seismically retrofitting reinforced concrete moment resisting frames by using expanded metal panels", Ph.D. Dissertation, Structural Engineering Sector, Department of Architecture, Geology, Environment and Constructions, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Liege.
  14. Eatherton, M. (2006), "Design and construction of steel plate shear walls", Proceedings of the 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 588, San Francisco, California, USA.
  15. FEMA 355C (2000), State of the Art Report on Systems Performance of Steel Moment Frames Subject to Earthquake Ground Shaking, Prepared by the SAC Joint Venture for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
  16. Gupta, A. and Krawinkler, H. (1999), Seismic Demands for Performance Evaluation of Steel Moment Resisting Frame Structures, Report No. 132, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University.
  17. Habashi, H.R. and Alinia, M.M. (2010), "Characteristics of the wall-frame interaction in steel plate shear walls", J. Constr. Steel Res., 66(2), 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.09.004
  18. HAZUS-MH MR5 (2010), Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology, Technical and User's Manual, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Mitigation Division, Washington, DC.
  19. Kurban, C.O. (2009), "A numerical study on response factors for steel plate shear wall systems", MSc. Thesis, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Middle East Technical University.
  20. Kurban, C.O. and Topkaya, C. (2009), "A numerical study on response modification, overstrength, and displacement amplification factors for steel plate shear wall systems", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(4), 497-516. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.866
  21. Lubell, A.S. (1997), "Performance of unstiffened steel plate shear walls under cyclic quasi-static loading", MSc. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia, Canada.
  22. Mahtab, M. and Zahedi, M. (2008), "Seismic retrofit of steel frames using steel plate shear walls", Asian J. Appl. Sci., 1(4), 316-326. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajaps.2008.316.326
  23. Mistakidis, E.S., De Matteis, G. and Formisano, A. (2007), "Low yield metal shear panels as an alternative for the seismic upgrading of concrete structures", Adv. Eng. Softw., 38(8-9), 626-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.08.043
  24. Park, H.G., Kwack, J.H., Jeon, S.W., Kim, W.K. and Choi, I.R. (2007), "Framed steel plate wall behavior under cyclic lateral loading", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 133(3), 378-388. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:3(378)
  25. Rezai, M. (1999), "Seismic behaviour of steel plate shear walls by shake table testing", Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  26. Sabelli, R. and Bruneau, M. (2006), Steel Plate Shear Walls, Steel Design Guide 20, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.
  27. Seilie, I.F. and Hooper, J.D. (2005), "Steel plate shear walls: Practical design and construction", Modern Steel Constr., 45(4), 37-43.
  28. Topkaya, C. and Kurban, C.O. (2009), "Natural periods of steel plate shear wall systems", J. Constr. Steel Res., 65(3), 542-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.03.006

피인용 문헌

  1. Ground motion selection and scaling for seismic design of RC frames against collapse vol.11, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.3.445
  2. An investigation of seismic parameters of low yield strength steel plate shear walls vol.12, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.5.713
  3. Investigation of performance of steel plate shear walls with partial plate-column connection (SPSW-PC) vol.39, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.39.1.109