DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Air-coupled ultrasonic tomography of solids: 2 Application to concrete elements

  • Hall, Kerry S. (Department of Engineering, University of Southern Indiana) ;
  • Popovics, John S. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
  • Received : 2014.02.12
  • Accepted : 2014.10.29
  • Published : 2016.01.25

Abstract

Applications of ultrasonic tomography to concrete structures have been reported for many years. However, practical and effective application of this tool for nondestructive assessment of internal concrete condition is hampered by time consuming transducer coupling that limits the amount of ultrasonic data that can be collected. This research aims to deploy recent developments in air-coupled ultrasonic measurements of solids, described in Part 1 of this paper set, to concrete in order to image internal inclusions. Ultrasonic signals are collected from concrete samples using a fully air-coupled (contactless) test configuration. These air coupled data are compared to those collected using partial semi-contact and full-contact test configurations. Two samples are considered: a 150 mm diameter cylinder with an internal circular void and a prism with $300mm{\times}300mm$ square cross-section that contains internal damaged regions and embedded reinforcement. The heterogeneous nature of concrete material structure complicates the application and interpretation of ultrasonic measurements and imaging. Volumetric inclusions within the concrete specimens are identified in the constructed velocity tomograms, but wave scattering at internal interfaces of the concrete disrupts the images. This disruption reduces defect detection accuracy as compared with tomograms built up of data collected from homogeneous solid samples (PVC) that are described in Part 1 of this paper set. Semi-contact measurements provide some improvement in accuracy through higher signal-to-noise ratio while still allowing for reasonably rapid data collection.

Keywords

References

  1. Aggelis, D.G. (2013), "Wave propagation through engineering materials; assessment and monitoring of structures through non-destructive techniques", Mater. Struct., 46(4), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0020-x
  2. Aggelis, D.G., Tsimpris, N., Chai, H.K., Shiotani, T. and Kobayashi, Y. (2011), "Numerical simulation of elastic waves for visualization of defects", Constr. Build.Mater., 25(4), 1503-1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.08.008
  3. ASTM Test Designation C 597-09 (2009), Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity through Concrete, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.02, West Conshohocken, PA
  4. Berriman, J., Purnell, P., Hutchins, D.A. and Neild., A. (2005), "Humidity and aggregate content correction factors for air-coupled ultrasonic evaluation of concrete", Ultrasonics, 43(4), 211-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2004.07.003
  5. Buyukosturk, O. (1998), "Imaging of concrete structures", NDT&E Int., 31(4), 233-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(98)00012-7
  6. Cetrangolo, G.P. and Popovics J.S. (2010), "Inspection of concrete using air-coupled ultrasonic pulse velocity", ACI Mater. J., 107(2), 155-163.
  7. Chai, H.K., Momoki, S., Kobayashi, Y., Aggelis, D.G. and Shiotani, T. (2011), "Tomographic reconstruction for concrete using attenuation of ultrasound", NDT&E Int., 44(2), 206-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.11.003
  8. Ferraro, C.C., Boyd, A.J. and Consolazio, G.R. (2013), "Evaluation of damage to bridge piers using pulse velocity tomography", Constr. Build. Mater., 38, 1303-1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.003
  9. Hall, K.S. and Popovics J.S. (2014), "Part1: Fully Air-Coupled Ultrasonic Tomography of Solids", Smart Struct. Syst., Submitted (in review).
  10. Hall, K.S. (2011), Air-coupled ultrasonic tomographic imaging of concrete elements, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
  11. Hoegh, K., Khazanovich, L. and Yu, H.T. (2012), "Concrete pavement joint diagnostics with ultrasonic tomography", Transport. Res. Record, 2305, 54-61. https://doi.org/10.3141/2305-06
  12. Hoegh, K., Khazanovich, L. and Yu, H.T. (2011), "Ultrasonic tomography for evaluation of concrete pavements", Transport. Res. Record, 2232, 85-94. https://doi.org/10.3141/2232-09
  13. Kase, E. and Ross T. (2004), "Seismic imaging as a means to evaluate foundation structures", in Current Practices and Future in Deep Foundations, Geotechnical Special Publication 125, American Society for Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
  14. Muller, S., Niederleithinger, E. and Bohlen T. (2012), "Reverse time migration: A seismic imaging technique applied to synthetic ultrasonic data", Int. J. Geophys., 128465.
  15. Rens, K.L. and Kim, T. (2007), "Inspection of Quebec street bridge in Denver, Colorado: Destructive and nondestructive testing", J. Perform. Constr. Fac., 21(3), 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:3(215)
  16. Rens, K.L., Transue, D.J. and Schuller. M.P. (2000), "Acoustic tomographic imaging of concrete infrastructure", J. Infrastruct. Syst., 6(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2000)6:1(15)
  17. Schabowicz, K. (2013), "Ultrasonic tomography - The latest nondestructive technique for testing concrete members - Description, test methodology,application example", Arch. Civil Mech. Eng., 14(2), 295-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2013.10.006
  18. Schickert. M. (2005), "Progress in ultrasonic imaging of concrete", Mater. Struct., 38(9), 807-815. https://doi.org/10.1617/14298
  19. Shiotani, T, Momoki, S., Chai, H.K. and Aggelis, D.G. (2009), "Elastic wave validation of large concrete structures repaired by means of cement grouting", Constr. Build. Mater., 23(7), 2647-2652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.01.005

Cited by

  1. Integrated visualization for reinforced concrete using ultrasonic tomography and image-based 3-D reconstruction vol.123, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.010
  2. Multiple crack evaluation on concrete using a line laser thermography scanning system vol.22, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2018.22.2.201
  3. A New Ultrasonic Amplitude Tomography Approach, with Validation on Masonry Tuff Blocks vol.39, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-020-00693-2