DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characterization of Neutral Invertase from Fast Growing Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Seedlings after Gibberellic Acid (GA) Treatment

GA 처리 후 급 성장하는 완두콩(Pisum sativum L.) 발아체로부터 분리된 중성 invertase의 특성

  • Received : 2015.07.22
  • Accepted : 2015.09.09
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

Invertase (β-D-fructosfuranosidase, EC 3.2.1.26) catalyzes the hydrolysis of sucrose into D-glucose and D-fructose. Three biochemical subgroups of invertases have been investigated in plants: vacuolar (soluble acid), cytoplasmic (soluble alkaline), and cell wall-bound (insoluble acid) invertases. An isoform of neutral invertase was purified from pea seedlings (Pisum sativum L.) and treated with gibberellic acid (GA) by sequential procedures consisting of ammonium sulfate precipitation, ion-exchange chromatography, absorption chromatography, and reactive green-19 affinity chromatography. The results of the overall insoluble invertase purification were a 430-fold increase. The purified neutral invertase was not glycosylated and had an optimum pH between neutral and alkaline (pH 6.8-7.5). It was inhibited by Tris, as well as by heavy metals, such as Hg2+ and Cu2+. Typical Michaelis–Menten kinetics were observed when the activity of the purified invertase was measured, with sucrose concentrations up to 100 mM. The Km and Vmax values were 12.95 mM and 2.98 U/min, respectively. The molecular mass was around 20 kDa. The sucrose-cleaving enzyme activity of this enzyme is similar to that of sucrose synthase and fructosyltransferase, but its biochemical characteristics are different from those of sucrose synthase and fructosyltransferase. Based on this biochemical characterization and existing knowledge, neutral INV is an invertase isoform in plants.

Invertase (β-D-fructosfuranosidase, EC 3.2.1.26)는 설탕을 포도당과 과당으로 가수분해하는 반응을 촉매한다. 3종류의 invertases [액포(수용성 산), 세포질(수용성 알칼리) 및 세포벽 결합]가 식물에서 연구되어 왔다. 우리는 순차적인 ammonium sulfate 침전, 이온교환크로마토그래피, 흡수크로마토그래피, Green-19 친화크로마토그래피 과정을 통해 완두콩(Pisum sativum L.) 발아체로부터 중성 invertase의 세포막 연결 isoform을 430배 순수 분리하였다. 분리된 세포막과 결합 된insoluble invertase (IN-INV)는 최적 pH는 중성에서 알칼리 사이(pH 6.8-7.5)로 나타났다. 이 효소는 Tris 뿐만 아니라 Hg2+ and Cu2+와 같은 중금속에 의해 저해되었다. IN-INV 의 Km과 Vmax 값은 각각 12.95 mM과 2.98 U/min으로 측정되었다. IN-INV는 기질로써 과당뿐만 아니라 라피노오스와 반응하기 때문에 진정한 β-fructofuranosidase로 판명되었다. IN-INV의 분자량 20 kDa이었다. 위 결과로 볼 때 GA 영향으로 급속히 자라는 발아체에서 단백질이 분리되었는데 특징적으로 invertase였다.

Keywords

Introduction

Invertase (β-D-fructosfuranosidase, EC 3.2.1.26) catalyses the hydrolysis of sucrose into D-glucose and D-fructose, the main forms of carbon and energy supply in plant metabolism. Invertases (INV) are widely distributed in the plant world and numerous studies describing them have been published [11, 14, 18, 19]. Plant invertases can be classified into different subgroups based on solubility, optimum pH, isoelectric point, and subcellular localization [23, 29]. In plants, three biochemical subgroups of invertases namely vacuolar (V-INVs), cell wall-bound (CW-INV), and cytoplasmic invertases (Cyto-INV) have been reported and characterized. The enzyme activities of these proteins were not inhibited by heavy metal ions such as Hg2+ and Ag2+ so that they might not have sulfhydryl groups at catalytic sites [27].

The Cyto-INV as a third type invertase is also called by neutral/alkaline invertase (N/A-INV) due to their pH-optimum (pH 6.8-8.0) and subcellular localization [27]. Insoluble alkiline-INV is a true member of β-fructofuranosidase which can react with sucrose as well as raffinose as substrates. Recently, small amounts of N/A-INV genes were cloned and characterized. N/A-INVs, unlike acidic invertase, are not a member of fructofuranosidases because N/A-INVs are all non-glycosylated proteins and can hydrolyze preferentially or solely sucrose [27, 30, 34]. Their molecular weights range between 60 kDa and 70 kDa by SDS-PAGE. The isolated active enzyme is commonly described as a tetramer or octamer [3, 8, 21]. N/A-INVs seem to have other catalytic sites which are not shown in acidic invertase because their activities are strongly inhibited by glucose, fructose, or Tris but not inhibited by heavy metal ions [23].

Most known functions about invertases are specific to particular developmental stages [10]. Vacuolar (V)-INVs play a critical role in maintaining and regulating sugar balance in fruit tissues and mature tubers [25]. V-INV involves in the mobilization of vacuolar sucrose in sucrose-storing organ [12] and is necessary in normal root elongation of Arabidopsis [26]. The enzyme activity of CW-INV was increased when plants were wounded and attacked by pathogens as well as during early embryo development [28]. In maize, CW-INV has an important role in normal kernel development [4] and pollen tube extension [9].

Gibberellic acid (GA) has been reported to increase invertase activity and enhanced plant growth with soluble saccharides [29].

Although N/A-INV is considered to be involved in plant growth and development as a maintenance enzyme and thought to be indispensible in normal plant growth [10]. Generally neutral/alkaline invertases are believed to have low and unstable activity [23, 35] and it is very difficult to investigate the roles of neutral/alkaline invertases [2].

Although there has been little report about N/A-INV compared to other type of invertases. Recently, it was reported that N/A-INV could be localized in subcellular organelles such as chloroplast and mitochondria as well as cytoplasm [22, 31]. In addition, neutral/alkaline cytoplasmic invertase can be also localized in nucleus [13, 32]. Hence, the presence and biochemical nature of an invertase localized in subcellular organelles is under the special attention. Moreover, the important facts about the invertase localization in subcellular organelles suggest that invertases can be present not only as a soluble form but as an insoluble form. The insoluble neutral/alkaline N/A-INV invertase in plant system with the characteristics of neutral-to-alkaline pH optima (pH 6.8-8.0) and membrane-bound activity is expected. In this paper, I purified and characterized an insoluble neural INV from tissues of fast growing pea seedlings after gibberellic acid treatment.

 

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and reagents

Seeds of the garden pea, Pisum sativum L. cv. Little Marvel (dwarf) or Alaska (tall), were planted and grown in the greenhouse at Silla University, Korea. The surface sterilized seeds were grown at room temperature in the dark for 7 days before treatment with 15 μM gibberellic acid (GA3) solution [14, 15]. The sprayed plants were harvested after 2 days. The required tissues were harvested separately, weighed and stored at −80℃. All common reagents were of analytical grade and were performed according to the methods of Kim et. al. [14, 15].

Enzyme purification and characterization

For the enzyme purification, crude extract preparation, ammonium sulfate precipitation, DEAE-Sepharose anion-exchange chromatography, absorption chromatography, reactive Green-19 affinity chromatography, Q-Sepharose anionexchange chromatography, and concentration methods were performed according to the methods of Kim et. al. [14, 15].

Determination of optimum pH and temperature, effect of a number of reagents (Tris-HCl, CuSO4 and HgCl2), substrate specificity and enzyme kinetics were performed according to the methods of Kim et. al. [14, 15]. Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed according to the methods of Kim et. al. [14, 15].

 

Results

Purification of insoluble invertase

The neutral invertase was obtained from the washed tissue residues after the soluble invertase activity had been removed. Insoluble invertase was extracted with enzyme extraction buffer containing 1 M NaCl. The protein sample in high-salt buffer solution was dialyzed in NaCl-free, 10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.2) at 4℃. The dialysate was passed through a DEAE-Sepharose column equilibrated with 10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.2).

The sequential procedures (data not shown) have been done with absorption chromatography, and reactive Green- 19 affinity chromatography. The results of the typical IN-INV purification are presented in Table 1. The overall purification was 430-fold increase (Table 1).

Table 1.Purification of neutral invertase from Pisum sativum L.

Characterization of neutral invertase

The optimum pH and temperature of the purified invertase were determined (Fig. 1). Enzyme showed activity in a range from pH 5 to 9. IN-INV had optimum activity at pH 6.8-7.5 (Fig. 1A). The activity of enzyme preparation was examined from 20℃ to 70℃ (Fig. 1B). IN-INV was most active at 37℃. We examined the effect of increasing concentrations of Tris-HCl, HgCl2, or CuSO4 on the activity of the purified enzyme (Fig. 2). 10 mM Tris-HCl, 0.03 mM HgCl2, or 1.18 mM CuSO4 inhibited IN-INV activity by about 50% (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.Effect of pH A and temperature B on activity of the insoluble neutral invertase from Pisum sativum L. All data were adjusted relative to the maximum activity (100%) for each enzyme. All experiments were performed 3-5 times and results were represented by averages of individual data.

Fig. 2.Effects of Tris-HCl (A), HgCl2 (B) and CuSO4 (C) on activity of insoluble neutral invertase from Pisum sativum L. In each assay, the inhibitor was pre-incubated with enzyme for 5 min before substrate (50 mM sucrose) was added to the reaction mixture. Results are expressed as % initial activity. All experiments were performed 3-5 times and results were represented by averages of individual data.

Typical Michaelis-Menten kinetics was observed when the activity of the purified invertase was measured sucrose concentrations up to 100 mM (Fig. 3). The Km and Vmax value of IN-INV were determined to be 12.95 mM and 2.98 U/min, respectively. Catalytic coefficiency (Vmax/Km) value for IN-INV was 0.23.

Fig. 3.Saturation curves of insoluble neutral invertase from Pisum sativum L. for sucrose. The inset shows the Lineweaver–Burk plot. All experiments were performed 3-5 times and results were represented by averages of individual data.

A substrate should contain an unsubstituted β-D-fructofuranosyl residue. I examined the abilities of the purified IN-INV to hydrolyze a range of oligosaccharides. The results are expressed as a percentage of the substrate hydrolyzed relative to sucrose (Table 2). The tested oligosaccharides were raffinose (Gal-α-1,6-Glu-β-1,2-Fru), melezitose (Glu-α-1,3-Fru-α-1,2-Glu) and trehalose (Glu-α-1,1-Glu). Raffinose, a β-fructofuranoside, was hydrolyzed to about 66.1% of the rate at which sucrose (Glu-β-1,2-Fru) was hydrolyzed. Melezitose, an α-fructofuranoside, was approximately 3.08% hydrolyzed and trehalose, an α-glucopyranoside, was not detected for hydrolyzation (Table 2). Hence, the sucrose-hydrolyzing enzymes isolated in this study appeared to be typical β-fructofuranosidases.

Table 2.Substrate specificity of the purified neutral invertase from Pisum sativum L.

The molecular weights of the purified invertases were determined around 20 kDa by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.SDS-PAGE analysis of protein samples from various stages of insoluble neutral invertase purification. Approximately 20 μg of protein were added to lanes 2–6. One band around 20kDa was gradually increased. The 10% gels were stained with Coomassie Blue. Lane 1, low molecular weight marker; lane 2, buffer/NaCl extract after dialysis; lane 3, peak of invertase activity eluted from DEAE-Sepharose; lane 4, peak of activity eluted from Green 19; lane 5, peak of activity eluted from hydroxyapatite; lane 6, invertase activity eluted from Q-Sepharose.

 

Discussion

To isolate this enzyme from cell residue, the purification steps were performed after the readily insoluble protein was washed with HEPES buffer (pH 7.2) containing 1M NaCl. And then IN-INV proteins were sequentially eluted by DEAE- and Q-Sepharose anion exchanger, hydroxyapatite chromatography, and Green-19 adsorption chromatography. This cytoplasmic isozyme has apparently non-glycosylated (data not shown) because IN-INV did not react with concanavalin-A sepharose chromatography according to Lee and Sturm [21]. This enzyme has been purified and the product contains a complex mixture of polypeptides and possibly several related proteins such multi-mer structures as a tetramer [3, 8, 21]. SDS-PAGE results indicated two major polypeptides with molecular weights of 20 and 80 kDa after octyl-agarose chromatography (data not shown). IEF-PAGE yielded a relatively diffuse band of activity and a broad band reacting with the antibody against broad bean IN-INV (data not shown). We will study more for understanding these problems in a future.

The studies on inhibition of pea invertase activity by Hg2+, Cu2+, or Tris have shown that IN-INV has properties consistent with those of other previously reported invertases [21, 24]. In the present study, pea IN-INV activity was strongly inhibited by Cu2+, similar to what was observed for the activities of alkaline invertase from soybean nodules, carrot suspension cultured cells, and pea seedling [8, 14, 21]. Pea IN-INV was completely inhibited by Hg2+, suggesting that one or more reduced sulfhydryl groups might be essential for the activity.

The kinetic properties of alkaline invertases were similar to those of other plants. Apparently, the responses of the enzymes to increasing sucrose concentrations followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics. The Km value of IN-INV for sucrose was determined to be 12.95 mM in this study (Fig. 3). For other plants, the Km values for alkaline invertase have been reported to range from 8.9 to 65 mM [3, 8, 21, 24]. IN-INV showed a selective β-fructofuranosidase activity, displaying clear substrate preference for sucrose and β- fructofuranosides. This β-fructofuranosidase activity distinguishes α-linked fructose residues from β-linked fructose residues and β-fructofuranosidase is unable to hydrolyze glucose linkages (Table 2). This establishes the IN-INV as a true invertase and not α-glucosidase, sucrase.

If IN-INV is localized in cell walls, the optimum pH should be acidic. However, in this work, IN-INV was extracted with high salt buffer and the optimum pH of IN-INV was pH 6.8-7.5. IN-INV seems to be strongly bound to cytoplasmic membranous components.

In addition to invertases, two types of sucrose cleaving enzymes, sucrose synthase and fructosyltransferase, have been reported [1, 7, 16, 23, 33]. Sucrose synthase was subcellularly localized in cytosol and was also found as a transiently membrane-bound form at plasma membrane and tonoplast membrane [16]. Fructosyltransferase showed fructan biosynthetic and degrading enzyme activity and sucrolytic activity in cytosol. Fructosyltransferase revealed the similar sequence homology with V-INV [7, 23, 33]. These two enzymes are soluble proteins and their optimal pH is acidic (pH 6.0-6.5 for sucrose synthase and pH 5.0-6.0 for fructosyltransferase). In this study, we purified and characterized a sucrose cleavaging enzyme from pea seedlings. This enzyme is similar to sucrose synthase and fructosyltransferase in sucrose cleavaging enzyme activity, but its biochemical characteristics are different from those of sucrose synthase and fructosyltransferase. Taken together based on the biochemical characterization and our knowledge, IN-INV is the characterized membrane-bound isoform among neutral invertases in pea.

References

  1. Barratt, D., Derbyshire, P., Findlay, K., Pike, M., Wellner, N., Lunn, J., Feil, R., Simpson, C., Maule, A. and Smith, A. 2009. Normal growth of Arabidopsis requires cytosolic invertase but not sucrose synthase. PNAS 106, 13124-13129. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900689106
  2. Bonfig, K., Berger, S., Fatima, T., Gonzalez, M. and Roitsch, T. 2007. Metabolic control of seedling development by invertases. Funct. Plant Biol. 34, 508-516. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP06206
  3. Chen, J. and Black, C. 1992. Biochemical and immunological properties of alkaline invertase isolated from sprouting soybean hypocotyls. Arch. Biochem. Biophy. 295, 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(92)90488-I
  4. Cheng, W., Taliercio, E. and Chourey, P. 1996. The Miniature1 seed locus of maize encodes a cell wall invertase required for normal development of endosperm and maternal cells in the pedicel. Plant Cell 8, 971-983. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.8.6.971
  5. Doehlert, D. and Felker, F. 1987. Characterization and distribution of invertase activity in developing maize (Zea mays) kernels. Physiol. Plant. 70, 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1987.tb08695.x
  6. Fahrendorf, T. and Beck, E. 1990. Cytosolic and cellwall-bound acid invertases from leaves of Urtica dioica L.:a comparison. Planta 180, 237-244.
  7. Gallagher, J. Cairns, A. and Pollock, C. 2004. Cloning and characterization of a putative fructosyltransferase and two putative invertase genes from the temperate grass Lolium temulentum L. J. Exp. Bot. 55, 557-569. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh056
  8. Godt, D. and Roitsch, T. 2006. The developmental and organ specific expression of sucrose cleaving enzymes in sugar beet suggests a transition between apoplasmic and symplasmic phloem unloading in the tap roots. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 44, 656-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2006.09.019
  9. Goetz, M., Godt, D., Guivarc’h, A., Kahmann, U., Chriqui, D. and Roitsch, T. 2001. Induction of male sterility in plants by metabolic engineering of the carbohydrate supply. PNAS 98, 6522-6527. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.091097998
  10. Greiner, S., Krausgrill, S. and Rausch, T. 1998. Cloning of a tobacco apoplasmic invertase inhibitor. Proof of function of the recombinant protein and expression analysis during plant development. Plant Physiol. 116, 733-742. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.116.2.733
  11. Hashizume, H., Tanase, K., Shiratake, K., Mori, H. and Yamaki, S. 2003. Purification and characterization of two soluble acid invertase isozymes from Japanese pear fruit. Phytochem. 63, 125-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(03)00107-9
  12. Husain, S., Thomas, B., Kingston-Smith, A. and Foyer, C. 2001. Invertase protein, but not activity, is present throughout development of Lycopersicon esculentum and L. pimpinellifolium fruit. New Phytol. 150, 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00064.x
  13. Ji, X., Van den Ende, W., Van Laere, A., Cheng, S. and Bennett, J. 2005. Structure, evolution, and expression of the two invertase gene families of rice. J. Mol. Evol. 60, 615-634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-004-0242-1
  14. Kim, D., Park, S., Chung, Y., Park, J., Lee, S. and Lee, T. K. 2010. Biochemical characterization of soluble acid and alkaline invertases from shoots of etiolated pea seedlings. J. Integr. Plant. Biol. 52, 536-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00937.x
  15. Kim, D., Lee, G., Chang, M., Park, J., Chung, Y., Lee, S. and Lee, T. K. 2011. Purification and biochemical characterization of insoluble acid invertase (INAC-INV) from pea seedlings. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 11228-11233. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf201057c
  16. Koch, K. 2004. Sucrose metabolism: regulatory mechanisms and pivotal roles in sugar sensing and plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7, 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2004.03.014
  17. Konno, Y., Vedvick, T., Fitzmaurice, L. and Mirkov, T. 1993. Purification, characterization, and subcellular localization of soluble invertase from tomato fruit. J. Plant Physiol. 141, 385-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)80183-5
  18. Lin, C., Lin, H., Wang, A. and Sung, H. 1999. Purification and characterization of an alkaline invertase from shoots of etiolated rice seedlings. New Phytol. 142, 427-434. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00416.x
  19. Liu, C., Huang, L., Chang, C. and Sung, H. 2006. Purification and characterization of soluble invertases from suspension-cultured bamboo (Bambusa edulis) cells. Food Chem. 96, 621-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.02.044
  20. Miller, W. and Ranwala, A. 1994. Characterization and localization of three soluble invertase forms from Lilium longiflorum flower buds. Physiol. Plant. 92, 247-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb05333.x
  21. Morell, M. and Copeland, L. 1984. Enzymes of sucrose breakdown in soybean nodules: alkaline invertase. Plant Physiol. 74, 1030-1034. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.74.4.1030
  22. Murayama, S. and Handa, H. 2007. Genes for alkaline/neutral invertase in rice: alkaline/neutral invertases are located in plant mitochondria and also in plastids. Planta 225, 1193-1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-006-0430-x
  23. Roitsch, T. and Gonzalez, M. C. 2004. Function and regulation of plant invertases: sweet sensations. Trends Plant Sci. 9, 606-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.10.009
  24. Ross, H., McRae, D. and Davies, H. 1996. Sucrolytic enzym eactivities in cotyledons of the faba bean (developmental changes and purification of alkaline invertase). Plant Physiol. 111, 329-338.
  25. Scholes, J., Bundock, N., Wilde, R. and Rolfe, S. 1996. The impact of reduced vacuolar invertase activity on the photosynthetic and carbohydrate metabolism of tomato. Planta 200, 265-272.
  26. Sergeeva, L., Keurentjes, J., Bentsink, L., Vonk, J., van der Plas, L., Koornneef, M. and Vreugdenhil, D. 2006. Vacuolar invertase regulates elongation of Arabidopsis thaliana rootsas revealed by QTL and mutant analysis. PNAS 103, 2994-2999. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0511015103
  27. Sturm, A. 1999. Invertases. Primary structures, functions, and roles in plant development and sucrose partitioning. Plant Physiol. 121, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.121.1.1
  28. Swarbrick, P., Schulze-Lefert, P. and Scholes, J. 2006. Metabolic consequences of susceptibility and resistance (race-specific and broad-spectrum) in barley leaves challenged with powdery mildew. Plant Cell Environ. 29, 1061-1076. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01472.x
  29. Tymowska-Lalanne, Z. and Kreis, M. 1998. The plant invertases: physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology. Adv. Bot. Resear. 28, 71-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2296(08)60294-3
  30. Vargas, W., Cumino, A. and Salerno, G. 2003. Cyanobacterial alkaline/neutral invertases. Origin of sucrose hydrolysis in the plant cytosol? Planta 216, 951-960.
  31. Vargas, W., Pontis, H. and Salerno, G. 2008. New insights on sucrose metabolism: evidence for an active A/N-Inv in chloroplasts uncovers a novel component of the intracellular carbon trafficking. Planta 227, 795-807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-007-0657-1
  32. Vargas, W. and Salerno, G. 2010. The Cinderella story of sucrose hydrolysis: Alkaline/neutral invertases, from cyanobacteria to unforeseen roles in plant cytosol and organelles. Plant Sci. 178, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.09.015
  33. Vijn, I. and Smeekens, S. 1999. Fructan: more than a reserve carbohydrate?. Plant Physiol. 120, 351-360. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.120.2.351
  34. Walker, R. and Al Winters, C. 1997. Purification and characterization of invertases from leaves of Lolium temulentum. New Phytol. 135, 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00635.x
  35. Yao, S., Kodama, R., Wang, H., Ichii, M., Taketa, S. and Yoshida, H. 2009. Analysis of the rice SHORT-ROOT5 gene revealed functional diversification of plant neutral/alkaline invertase family. Plant Sci. 176, 627-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.02.002
  36. Zhang, L., Cohn, N. and Mitchell, J. 1996. Induction of a pea cell-wall invertase gene by wounding and its localized expression in phloem. Plant Physiol. 112, 1111-1117.