Advances in aircraft and spacecraft science

  • 제2권1호
  • /
  • Pages.45-56
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2287-528X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-5271(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Aerodynamic control capability of a wing-flap in hypersonic, rarefied regime

  • Zuppardi, Gennaro (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples "Federico II")
  • 투고 : 2014.06.13
  • 심사 : 2014.09.12
  • 발행 : 2015.01.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The attitude aerodynamic control is an important subject in the design of an aerospace plane. Usually, at high altitudes, this control is fulfilled by thrusters so that the implementation of an aerodynamic control of the vehicle has the advantage of reducing the amount of thrusters fuel to be loaded on board. In the present paper, the efficiency of a wing-flap has been evaluated considering a NACA 0010 airfoil with a trailing edge flap of length equal to 35% of the chord. Computational tests have been carried out in hypersonic, rarefied flow by a direct simulation Monte Carlo code at the altitudes of 65 and 85 km, in the range of angle of attack 0-40 deg. and with flap deflection equal to 0, 15 and 30 deg.. Effects of the flap deflection have been quantified by the variations of the aerodynamic force and of the longitudinal moment. The shock wave-boundary layer interaction and the shock wave-shock wave interaction have been also considered. A possible interaction of the leading edge shock wave and of the shock wave arising from the vertex of the convex corner, produced on the lower surface of the airfoil when the flap is deflected, generates a shock wave whose intensity is stronger than those of the two interacting shock waves. This produces a consistent increment of pressure and heat flux on the lower surface of the flap, where a thermal protection system is required.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bertin, J.J. (1994), Hypersonic Aerothermodynamics, AIAA Education Series, Washington, USA.
  2. Bird, G.A. (1998), Molecular Gas Dynamics and Direct Simulation Monte Carlo, Clarendon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  3. Bird, G.A. (2006), "Sophisticated Versus Simple DSMC", Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Rarefied Gas Dynamics, Saint Petersburg, Russia, July.
  4. Bird, G.A. (2012), Visual DSMC Program for Two-Dimensional Flows, the DS2V Program User's Guide Version 4.5, Sidney, Australia.
  5. Bird, G.A., Gallis, M.A., Torczynski, J.R. and Rader, D.J. (2009), "Accuracy and efficiency of the sophisticated direct simulation Monte Carlo algorithm for simulating non-continuum gas flows", Phys. Fluid., 21(1), DOI:10.1063/1.3067865.
  6. BOEING X37B OBV, URL: http://www.ibtimes.com/secret-boeing-x-37b-spacecraft-finds-home-kennedyspace-center-1526688.
  7. Delery, J. and Marvin (1986), "Shock-Wave Boundary Layer Interactions", AGARD AG.280.
  8. Delery, J. and Panaras, A. (1996), "Shock-wave boundary-layer interactions in high Mach number flows", AGARD AR-319, Vol. 1.
  9. Edney, B.E. (1968), "Effects of Shock Impingement on Heat Transfer around Blunt Bodies", AIAA J., 6(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.4435
  10. Gallis, M.A., Torczynski, J.R., Rader, D.J. and Bird, G.A. (2009), "Convergence behavior of a new DSMC algorithm", J. Computat. Phys., 228(12), 4532-4548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.03.021
  11. Gupta, R.N., Yos, J.M. and Thompson, R.A. (1989), "A Review of Reaction Rates and Thermodynamic Transport Properties for an 11-Species Air Model for Chemical and Thermal Non-Equilibrium Calculations to 30,000 K", NASA TM 101528.
  12. Korkegi, R.H. (1971), "Survey of viscous interactions associated with high Mach uumber flight", AIAA J., 9(5), 771-784. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.6275
  13. Moss, J.N. (1995), "Rarefied Flows of Planetary Entry Capsules", Special course on Capsule Aerothermodynamics, Rhode-Saint-Genese, Belgium, May, AGARD-R-808, 95-129.
  14. Shen, C. (2005), Rarefied Gas Dynamic: Fundamentals, Simulations and Micro Flows, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
  15. Sippel, M., van Foreest, A., Bauer, C. and Cremaschi, F. (2011), "System investigation of the SpaceLiner concept in FAST20XX", AIAA Paper, 2011-2294.
  16. Tausche, M., Savino, R., Monti, R., Di Sotto, E., Cantos, T., Janovsky, R., Scheper, M., Apeldoorn, J., De Stefano Fumo, M., Paterna, D., Branco, J. and Molina, R. (2009), "PHOEBUS: A high lift-over-drag vehicle for Earth re-entry", 16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Bremen, Germany.
  17. Varvill R. and Bond A. (2004), "The SKYLON spaceplane", J. British Interplan. Soc., 57, 22-32.
  18. X-51 Scramjet Engine Demonstrator-WaveRider (SED-WR), URL: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/x-51.htm.
  19. Zuppardi, G., Visone, G., Votta, R. and Schettino, A. (2011), "Analysis of aerodynamic performances of experimental flying test bed in high-altitude flight", J. Aerosp. Eng., 225(3), 247-258.
  20. Zuppardi, G., Morsa, L., Sippel, M. and Schwanekamp, T. (2014), "Aero-thermo-dynamic analysis of the SpaceLiner-7.1 vehicle in high altitude flight", Proceedings of the 29th International Symposium on Rarefied Gas Dynamics, Xian (China), July.

피인용 문헌

  1. Influence of Mach number and static pressure on plasma flow control of supersonic and rarefied flows around a sharp flat plate vol.58, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2346-6
  2. Aerodynamic control capability of a wing-flap in hypersonic, rarefied regime: Part II vol.4, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/aas.2017.4.5.503
  3. Effects of chemistry in Mars entry and Earth re-entry vol.5, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/aas.2018.5.5.581