Journal of Climate Change Research (한국기후변화학회지)

The Korean Society of Climate Change Research (한국기후변화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Feasibility Identification on Establishment of Solar Energy (Photovoltaic and Solar Heating) at the Environmental Basic Facilities in Busan

부산시 환경기초시설 내 태양에너지(태양광/태양열) 이용 시설 설치 타당성 확인

  • Kim, Jiwon (Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Dongeui University) ;
  • Choi, Hyunho (Dept. of Accounting, Dongeui University) ;
  • Kim, Samuel (Dept. of Building Systems Engineering, Dongeui University) ;
  • Park, Jeahong (Dept. of Building Systems Engineering, Dongeui University) ;
  • Kim, Donghyun (Dept. of Building Systems Engineering, Dongeui University) ;
  • Lee, Daeseon (Busan Environmental Corporation) ;
  • Park, Sangtae (Busan Environmental Corporation) ;
  • Kim, Gyusik (Busan Environmental Corporation) ;
  • Yu, Jaecheul (Dept. of Energy Environmental Engineering, Silla University)
  • Received : 2015.04.10
  • Accepted : 2015.06.15
  • Published : 2015.06.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With 12 environmental basic facilities (EBF) in Busan, each business place's present situation of the operation of new and renewable energy as well as the feasibility to establish additional systems of utilizing solar energy (photovoltaic power generation system [PPGS] and solar heating system [SHS]) were investigated. Currently, with the environmental basic facilities, the new and renewable energies (such as, waste heat, biogas, PPGS, SHS, and small hydro power) can produce 195 GWh per year as electric power unit. Among the energy sources, except waste heat, biogas (154 GWh/yr) appears as the highest. Next, PPGS is the second most widely used system and produces 5,560 MWh/yr at 11 business places. Through a field survey, it appears that 19 business places of total 27 places at 12 EBFs have good locational conditions and they need an introduction of PPGS. Through it, it is investigated that it would be possible to produce 5,311 MWh/yr and to reduce $2,348tCO_2/yr$. And, it is identified that SHS can be additionally introduced in only 4 EBFs. This can reduce energy cost as much as one ten million won/yr and green-house gas as much as $28tCO_2/yr$. A cost-benefic analysis shows that the use of governmental support or private investment can be the most efficient way, when PPGS and SHS are introduced in EBFs.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 부산환경공단