DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Soil arching analysis in embankments on soft clays reinforced by stone columns

  • Fattah, Mohammed Y. (Building and Construction Engineering Department, University of Technology) ;
  • Zabar, Bushra S. (Civil Engineering Department, University of Baghdad) ;
  • Hassan, Hanan A. (Highway and Transportation Engineering Department, University of Al-Mustansiriya)
  • Received : 2015.03.20
  • Accepted : 2015.10.28
  • Published : 2015.11.25

Abstract

The present work investigates the behavior of the embankment models resting on soft soil reinforced with ordinary and stone columns encased with geogrid. Model tests were performed with different spacing distances between stone columns and two lengths to diameter ratios (L/d) of the stone columns, in addition to different embankment heights. A total number of 42 model tests were carried out on a soil with undrianed shear strength $${\sim_\sim}10kPa$$. The models consist of stone columns embankment at s/d equal to 2.5, 3 and 4 with L/d ratio equal 5 and 8. Three embankment heights; 200 mm, 250 mm and 300 mm were tested for both tests of ordinary (OSC) and geogrid encased stone columns (ESC). Three earth pressure cells were used to measure directly the vertical effective stress on column at the top of the middle stone column under the center line of embankment and on the edge stone column for all models while the third cell was placed at the base of embankment between two columns to measure the vertical effective stress in soft soil directly. The performance of stone columns embankments relies upon the ability of the granular embankment material to arch over the 'gaps' between the stone columns spacing. The results showed that the ratio of the embankment height to the clear spacing between columns (h/s-d) is a key parameter. It is found that (h/s-d)<1.2 and 1.4 for OSC and ESC, respectively; (h is the embankment height, s is the spacing between columns and d is the diameter of stone columns), no effect of arching is pronounced, the settlement at the surface of the embankment is very large, and the stress acting on the subsoil is virtually unmodified from the nominal overburden stress. When $(h/s-d){\geq}2.2$ for OSC and ESC respectively, full arching will occur and minimum stress on subsoil between stone columns will act, so the range of critical embankment height will be 1.2 (h/sd) to 2.2 (h/s-d) for both OSC and ESC models.

Keywords

References

  1. Al-Shaikhly, A.A. (2000), "Effected of stone grain size on the behavior of stone column", M.Sc. Thesis, Building and Construction Engineering Department, University of Technology, Iraq.
  2. ASTM, D422 (2003), "Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils", Soil and Rock, 04.08.
  3. ASTM, D854 (2003), "Standard test method for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer", Soil and Rock, 04.08.
  4. ASTM, D4318 (2003), "Standard test method for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils", Soil and Rock, 04.08.
  5. ASTM, D6637 (2003), "Standard test methods for determining tensile properties of geogrids by the single or multi-rib tensile method1", Soil and Rock, 04.08.
  6. British Standard B.S.:1377 part 2 (1990), "Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes general requirements and sample preparation", British Standard Institution, London.
  7. Britton, E. and Naughton, P. (2008), "An experimental investigation of arching in piled Embankments", Proceedings of the 4th European Geosynthetics Conference, Edinburgh, UK, September.
  8. Chen, R.P., Chen, Y.M., Han, J. and Xu, Z.Z. (2008), "A theoretical solution for pile-supported Embankments on soft soils under one-dimensional compression", Can. Geotech. J., 45(5), 611-623. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-003
  9. Fattah, M.Y., Shlash, K.T. and Al-Waily, M.J. (2011), "Stress concentration ratio of model stone columns in soft clays", Geotech. Test. J., 34(1), 61-71.
  10. Fattah, M.Y. and Majeed, Q.G. (2012), "Finite element analysis of geogrid encased stone columns", Geotech. Geolog. Eng. J., 30, 713-726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9488-8
  11. Han, J. and Gabr, M.A. (2002), "Numerical analysis of geosynthetic reinforced and pile-supported earth platforms over soft soil", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 128(1), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:1(44)
  12. Han, J. and Collin, J.G. (2005), "Geosynthetic support system over pile foundations", Geotech. Eng. Spec. Pub., ASCE, 130(142), 3949-3953.
  13. Hewlett, W.J. and Randolph, M.F. (1988), "Analysis of piled Embankments", Ground Eng., 21(3), 12-18.
  14. Iglesia, G.R., Einstein, H.H. and Whitman, R.V. (1999), "Determination of vertical loading on underground structures based on an arching evolution concept", Proceedings 3rd National Conference on Geo- Engineering for Underground Facilities, Illinois, United States.
  15. Jenck, O., Dias, D. and Kastner, R. (2006), "Two-dimensional physical modelling of soft ground improvement by vertical rigid piles", 6th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics ICPMG, 527-532.
  16. Naughton, P.J. (2007), "The significance of critical height in the design of piled Embankments", Proceedings of Geo-Denver 2007, Denver, Colorado.
  17. Terzahgi, K. (1943), Theoretical Soil Mechanics, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  18. Van Eekelen, S.J.M. and Bezuijen, A. (2008), "Design of piled Embankments considering the basic starting points of the British Standard BS8006", Proceedings of the 4th European Geosynthetics Conference, Edinburgh, UK.
  19. Yan Z. (2009), "Numerical modeling of arching in piled embankments including the effects of reinforcement and subsoil", Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham, U.K.
  20. Van Eekelen, S.J.M., Bezuijen, A., Lodder, H.J. and Van Tol, A.F. (2012a), "Model experiments on piled Embankments, Part I", Geotext. Geomembran., 32, 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.11.002
  21. Van Eekelen, S.J.M. Bezuijen, A., Lodder, H.J. and van Tol, A.F. (2012b), "Model experiments on piled Embankments, Part II", Geotext. Geomembran., 32, 82-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.11.003
  22. Zhuang, Y., Wang, K.Y. and Liu, H.L. (2014), "A simplified model to analyze the reinforced piled Embankments", Geotext. Geomembran., 42, 154-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.01.002

Cited by

  1. Load transfer and arching analysis in reinforced embankment vol.169, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.15.00046
  2. A response surface method based on sub-region of interest for structural reliability analysis vol.57, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.57.4.587
  3. Stochastic analysis for uncertain deformation of foundations in permafrost regions vol.14, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2018.14.6.589
  4. Settlement Behavior of Soft Subgrade Reinforced by Geogrid-Encased Stone Column and Geocell-Embedded Sand Cushion: A Numerical Analysis vol.2020, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8874520
  5. Reliability Analysis of a Controlled Stage-Constructed and Reinforced Embankment on Soft Ground Using 2D and 3D Models vol.5, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00150
  6. Degradation reliability modeling of plain concrete for pavement under flexural fatigue loading vol.9, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2020.9.5.469
  7. The equivalent shear strength properties of the composite soil reinforced by stone columns: an FDM-DEM-coupled numerical evaluation vol.80, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09412-0
  8. A Review on Deep mixing method for soil improvement vol.1105, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1105/1/012110
  9. Investigation on load-carrying capacity of geogrid-encased deep cement mixing piles vol.28, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.21.00026
  10. 3D coupled mechanical and hydraulic modeling of geosynthetic encased stone column-supported embankment over soft clay vol.39, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119x.2020.1825571