DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Extraspinal Incidental Findings on Routine MRI of Lumbar Spine: Prevalence and Reporting Rates in 1278 Patients

  • Tuncel, Sedat Alpaslan (Department of Radiology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Balkan Campus) ;
  • Cagli, Bekir (Department of Radiology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Balkan Campus) ;
  • Tekatas, Aslan (Department of Neurology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Balkan Campus) ;
  • Kirici, Mehmet Yadigar (Department of Radiology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Balkan Campus) ;
  • Unlu, Ercument (Department of Radiology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Balkan Campus) ;
  • Genchellac, Hakan (Department of Radiology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Balkan Campus)
  • 투고 : 2014.07.07
  • 심사 : 2015.03.10
  • 발행 : 2015.08.01

초록

Objective: The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence and reporting rate of incidental findings (IF) in adult outpatients undergoing lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: Re-evaluation of a total of 1278 lumbar MRI images (collected from patients with a mean age of 50.5 years, range 16-91 years) captured between August 2010-August 2011 was done by a neuroradiologist and a musculoskeletal radiologist. IFs were classified according to organ or system (liver, gallbladder, kidney, bladder, uterus, ovary, lymph node, intestine and aorta). The rate of reporting of a range of IF was examined. The outcome of each patient's treatment was evaluated based on review of hospital records and by telephone interviews. Results: A total of 253 IFs were found in 241 patients (18.8% of 1278). Among these, clinically significant IFs (n = 34) included: 2 renal masses (0.15%), 2 aortic aneurysms (0.15%), 2 cases of hydronephrosis (0.15%), 11 adrenal masses (0.86%), 7 lymphadenopathies (0.55%), 6 cases of endometrial or cervical thickening (0.47%), 1 liver hemangioma (0.08%), 1 pelvic fluid (0.08%) and 2 ovarian dermoid cysts (0.15%). Overall, 28% (71/253) of IFs were included in the clinical reports, while clinically significant findings were reported in 41% (14/34) of cases. Conclusion: Extraspinal IFs are commonly detected during a routine lumbar MRI, and many of these findings are not clinically significant. However, IFs including clinically important findings are occasionally omitted from formal radiological reports.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Wagner SC, Morrison WB, Carrino JA, Schweitzer ME, Nothnagel H. Picture archiving and communication system: effect on reporting of incidental findings. Radiology 2002;225:500-505 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2252011731
  2. Fileni A, Magnavita N. A 12-year follow-up study of malpractice claims against radiologists in Italy. Radiol Med 2006;111:1009-1022 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-006-0099-z
  3. Magnavita N, Magnavita G, Fileni A, Bergamaschi A. Ethical problems in radiology: medical error and disclosure. Radiol Med 2009;114:1345-1355 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-009-0445-z
  4. Park HJ, Jeon YH, Rho MH, Lee EJ, Park NH, Park SI, et al. Incidental findings of the lumbar spine at MRI during herniated intervertebral disk disease evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:1151-1155 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5457
  5. Lee SY, Landis MS, Ross IG, Goela A, Leung AE. Extraspinal findings at lumbar spine CT examinations: prevalence and clinical importance. Radiology 2012;263:502-509 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112152
  6. Hlatky MA, Iribarren C. The dilemma of incidental findings on cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1542-1543 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.024
  7. Xiong T, Richardson M, Woodroffe R, Halligan S, Morton D, Lilford RJ. Incidental lesions found on CT colonography: their nature and frequency. Br J Radiol 2005;78:22-29 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/67998962
  8. Konnak JW, Grossman HB. Renal cell carcinoma as an incidental finding. J Urol 1985;134:1094-1096 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)47639-7
  9. Quattrocchi CC, Giona A, Di Martino AC, Errante Y, Scarciolla L, Mallio CA, et al. Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study. Insights Imaging 2013;4:301-308 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0234-z
  10. Kamath S, Jain N, Goyal N, Mansour R, Mukherjee K. Incidental findings on MRI of the spine. Clin Radiol 2009;64:353-361 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2008.09.010
  11. Baysal T, Soylu A. Percutaneous treatment of simple renal cysts with n-butyl cyanoacrylate and iodized oil. Diagn Interv Radiol 2009;15:148-152
  12. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2191-2200 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa031618
  13. Dahnert W. Radiology review manual, 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1999:759
  14. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, Dachman AH, Fenlon HM, Ferrucci JT, et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005;236:3-9 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2361041926

피인용 문헌

  1. Extraspinal Incidental Findings at Lumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Two Hospitals: Prevalence and Clinical Importance vol.7, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojrad.2017.74026
  2. Clinical impact of coronal-STIR sequence in a routine lumbar spine MR imaging protocol to investigate low back pain vol.97, pp.23, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000010789
  3. Incidental extraspinal findings in the lumbar spine during magnetic resonance imaging of intervertebral discs vol.4, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00803
  4. Incidental Renal Lesions on Lumbar Spine MRI: Who Needs Follow-Up? vol.212, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.18.20079
  5. Incidentalomas in Spine and Spinal Cord Imaging vol.29, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-019-00773-5
  6. Incidental findings in lumbar spine MRI: their prevalence and potential impact on patient management vol.50, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-019-0059-y
  7. IBD considerations in spondyloarthritis vol.12, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720x20939410
  8. Extraspinal findings prevalence and clinical significance in 4250 lumbar spine MRI exams vol.11, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81069-y