DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Renal Oxygenation Level Changes after Water Loading Using Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging and T2* Mapping

  • Ding, Jiule (Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, Changzhou) ;
  • Xing, Wei (Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, Changzhou) ;
  • Wu, Dongmei (Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, East China Normal University) ;
  • Chen, Jie (Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, Changzhou) ;
  • Pan, Liang (Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, Changzhou) ;
  • Sun, Jun (Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, Changzhou) ;
  • Xing, Shijun (Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, Changzhou) ;
  • Dai, Yongming (Philips Healthcare)
  • Received : 2014.07.11
  • Accepted : 2015.04.08
  • Published : 2015.08.01

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) while monitoring changes in renal oxygenation level after water loading. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two volunteers (age, $28.0{\pm}2.2$ years) were enrolled in this study. SWI and multi-echo gradient echo sequence-based T2* mapping were used to cover the kidney before and after water loading. Cortical and medullary parameters were measured using small regions of interest, and their relative changes due to water loading were calculated based on baseline and post-water loading data. An intraclass correlation coefficient analysis was used to assess inter-observer reliability of each parameter. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to compare the performance of the two methods for detecting renal oxygenation changes due to water loading. Results: Both medullary phase and medullary T2* values increased after water loading (p < 0.001), although poor correlations were found between the phase changes and the T2* changes (p > 0.05). Interobserver reliability was excellent for the T2* values, good for SWI cortical phase values, and moderate for the SWI medullary phase values. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve of the SWI medullary phase values was 0.85 and was not different from the medullary T2* value (0.84). Conclusion: Susceptibility-weighted imaging enabled monitoring changes in the oxygenation level in the medulla after water loading, and may allow comparable feasibility to detect renal oxygenation level changes due to water loading compared with that of T2* mapping.

Keywords

References

  1. Brezis M, Rosen S. Hypoxia of the renal medulla--its implications for disease. N Engl J Med 1995;332:647-655 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199503093321006
  2. Eckardt KU, Bernhardt WM, Weidemann A, Warnecke C, Rosenberger C, Wiesener MS, et al. Role of hypoxia in the pathogenesis of renal disease. Kidney Int Suppl 2005;(99):S46-S51
  3. Epstein FH, Agmon Y, Brezis M. Physiology of renal hypoxia. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1994;718:72-81; discussion 81-82
  4. Zhang W, Edwards A. Oxygen transport across vasa recta in the renal medulla. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002;283:H1042-H1055 https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00074.2002
  5. Li LP, Vu AT, Li BS, Dunkle E, Prasad PV. Evaluation of intrarenal oxygenation by BOLD MRI at 3.0 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:901-904 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20176
  6. Tumkur SM, Vu AT, Li LP, Pierchala L, Prasad PV. Evaluation of intra-renal oxygenation during water diuresis: a time-resolved study using BOLD MRI. Kidney Int 2006;70:139-143 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5000347
  7. Ji L, Li LP, Schnitzer T, Du H, Prasad PV. Intra-renal oxygenation in rat kidneys during water loading: effects of cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition and nitric oxide (NO) donation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:383-387 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22253
  8. Li LP, Storey P, Pierchala L, Li W, Polzin J, Prasad P. Evaluation of the reproducibility of intrarenal R2* and Delta R2* measurements following administration of furosemide and during waterload. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:610-616 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20043
  9. Li LP, Ji L, Lindsay S, Prasad PV. Evaluation of intrarenal oxygenation in mice by BOLD MRI on a 3.0T human whole-body scanner. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:635-638 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20841
  10. Haacke EM, Xu Y, Cheng YC, Reichenbach JR. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med 2004;52:612-618 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20198
  11. Haacke EM, Tang J, Neelavalli J, Cheng YC. Susceptibility mapping as a means to visualize veins and quantify oxygen saturation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:663-676 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22276
  12. Zuo CS, Rofsky NM, Mahallati H, Yu J, Zhang M, Gilbert S, et al. Visualization and quantification of renal R2* changes during water diuresis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:676-682 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10314
  13. Wu Z, Mittal S, Kish K, Yu Y, Hu J, Haacke EM. Identification of calcification with MRI using susceptibility-weighted imaging: a case study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:177-182 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21617
  14. Aukland K, Krog J. Renal oxygen tension. Nature 1960;188:671 https://doi.org/10.1038/188671a0
  15. Han F, Xiao W, Xu Y, Wu J, Wang Q, Wang H, et al. The significance of BOLD MRI in differentiation between renal transplant rejection and acute tubular necrosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:2666-2672 https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfn064
  16. Prasad PV, Epstein FH. Changes in renal medullary pO2 during water diuresis as evaluated by blood oxygenation level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging: effects of aging and cyclooxygenase inhibition. Kidney Int 1999;55:294-298 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00237.x
  17. Ning N, Zhang L, Gao J, Zhang Y, Ren Z, Niu G, et al. Assessment of iron deposition and white matter maturation in infant brains by using enhanced T2 star weighted angiography (ESWAN): R2* versus phase values. PLoS One 2014;9:e89888 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089888
  18. Yan SQ, Sun JZ, Yan YQ, Wang H, Lou M. Evaluation of brain iron content based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): comparison among phase value, R2* and magnitude signal intensity. PLoS One 2012;7:e31748 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031748
  19. Li M, Hu J, Miao Y, Shen H, Tao D, Yang Z, et al. In vivo measurement of oxygenation changes after stroke using susceptibility weighted imaging filtered phase data. PLoS One 2013;8:e63013 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063013
  20. Neugarten J. Renal BOLD-MRI and assessment for renal hypoxia. Kidney Int 2012;81:613-614 https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2011.462
  21. Aquino D, Bizzi A, Grisoli M, Garavaglia B, Bruzzone MG, Nardocci N, et al. Age-related iron deposition in the basal ganglia: quantitative analysis in healthy subjects. Radiology 2009;252:165-172 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2522081399
  22. Yao B, Li TQ, Gelderen Pv, Shmueli K, de Zwart JA, Duyn JH. Susceptibility contrast in high field MRI of human brain as a function of tissue iron content. Neuroimage 2009;44:1259-1266 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.029
  23. Tao R, Zhang J, Dai Y, You Z, Fan Y, Cui J, et al. An in vitro and in vivo analysis of the correlation between susceptibility-weighted imaging phase values and R2* in cirrhotic livers. PLoS One 2012;7:e45477 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045477
  24. Haacke EM, Miao Y, Liu M, Habib CA, Katkuri Y, Liu T, et al. Correlation of putative iron content as represented by changes in R2* and phase with age in deep gray matter of healthy adults. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:561-576 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22293
  25. Liu C, Li W, Wu B, Jiang Y, Johnson GA. 3D fiber tractography with susceptibility tensor imaging. Neuroimage 2012;59:1290-1298 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.096
  26. Ries M, Jones RA, Basseau F, Moonen CT, Grenier N. Diffusion tensor MRI of the human kidney. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:42-49 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1149
  27. Sigmund EE, Vivier PH, Sui D, Lamparello NA, Tantillo K, Mikheev A, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion-tensor imaging in renal tissue under hydration and furosemide flow challenges. Radiology 2012;263:758-769 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12111327
  28. Raman JD, Bensalah K, Bagrodia A, Tracy CR, Kabbani W, Sagalowsky AI, et al. Comparison of tissue oxygenation profiles using 3 different methods of vascular control during porcine partial nephrectomy. Urology 2009;74:926-931 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.018
  29. Djamali A, Sadowski EA, Muehrer RJ, Reese S, Smavatkul C, Vidyasagar A, et al. BOLD-MRI assessment of intrarenal oxygenation and oxidative stress in patients with chronic kidney allograft dysfunction. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2007;292:F513-F522 https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00222.2006
  30. Li J, Chang S, Liu T, Wang Q, Cui D, Chen X, et al. Reducing the object orientation dependence of susceptibility effects in gradient echo MRI through quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med 2012;68:1563-1569 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24135

Cited by

  1. MRI tools for assessment of microstructure and nephron function of the kidney vol.311, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00134.2016
  2. Selection and Reporting of Statistical Methods to Assess Reliability of a Diagnostic Test: Conformity to Recommended Methods in a Peer-Reviewed Journal vol.18, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.6.888
  3. Multiparametric Renal Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation, Interventions, and Alterations in Chronic Kidney Disease vol.8, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00696
  4. Dual‐Pathway sequences for MR thermometry: When and where to use them vol.77, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26177
  5. Added Value of Parotid R2* Values for Evaluation of Sjögren Syndrome: A Preliminary Study vol.41, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000000554
  6. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Fibrotic Kidney vol.28, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2016101089
  7. Assessment of delayed graft function using susceptibility-weighted imaging in the early period after kidney transplantation: a feasibility study vol.44, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1709-7