참고문헌
- Motoyama S, Anno H, Sarai M, Sato T, Sanda Y, Ozaki Y, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with a prototype 256-row area detector computed tomography system: comparison with conventional invasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:773-775 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.062
- Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2324-2336 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0806576
- Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML, Vorobiof G, Nallamshetty L, Mitsouras D, et al. Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;24:535-546 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-008-9308-2
- Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007;298:317-323 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.3.317
- Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, Hadamitzky M, Krebs M, Gerber TC, et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 2009;301:500-507 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.54
- Achenbach S, Goroll T, Seltmann M, Pflederer T, Anders K, Ropers D, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by lowdose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:328-337 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.01.012
- Hong YJ, Kim SJ, Lee SM, Min PK, Yoon YW, Lee BK, et al. Low-dose coronary computed tomography angiography using prospective ECG-triggering compared to invasive coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;27:425-431 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9674-4
- Hosch W, Heye T, Schulz F, Lehrke S, Schlieter M, Giannitsis E, et al. Image quality and radiation dose in 256-slice cardiac computed tomography: comparison of prospective versus retrospective image acquisition protocols. Eur J Radiol 2011;80:127-135 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.07.011
- Herzog BA, Husmann L, Valenta I, Tay FM, Burkhard N, Gaemperli O, et al. Determinants of vessel contrast in BMIadapted low dose CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:625-630 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-009-9460-3
- Hosch W, Stiller W, Mueller D, Gitsioudis G, Welzel J, Dadrich M, et al. Reduction of radiation exposure and improvement of image quality with BMI-adapted prospective cardiac computed tomography and iterative reconstruction. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:3568-3576 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.06.055
- Ghoshhajra BB, Engel LC, Major GP, Verdini D, Sidhu M, Karolyi M, et al. Direct chest area measurement: a potential anthropometric replacement for BMI to inform cardiac CT dose parameters? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011;5:240-246 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2011.06.003
- Valentin J; International Commission on Radiation Protection. Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). ICRP Publication 102. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1-79, iii
- Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51(4 Suppl):5-40 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.51.4.5
- Matsubara K, Koshida K, Suzuki M, Shimono T, Yamamoto T, Matsui O. Effective dose evaluation of multidetector CT examinations: influence of the ICRP recommendation in 2007. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2855-2861 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1497-0
- Neefjes LA, Dharampal AS, Rossi A, Nieman K, Weustink AC, Dijkshoorn ML, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure using different low-dose scan protocols in dual-source CT coronary angiography: randomized study. Radiology 2011;261:779-786 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110606
- Hoang JK, Hurwitz LM, Boll DT. Optimization of tube current in coronary multidetector computed tomography angiography: assessment of a standardized method to individualize current selection based on body habitus. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009;33:498-504 https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e31818af37c
- Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Martinoff S, Schomig A, et al. Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: results of the PROTECTION I study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:940-946 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.02.015
- Feuchtner GM, Jodocy D, Klauser A, Haberfellner B, Aglan I, Spoeck A, et al. Radiation dose reduction by using 100-kV tube voltage in cardiac 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study. Eur J Radiol 2010;75:e51-e56 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.012
- Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, Min JK, Mancini GB, Lin FY, et al. Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:655-660 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4288
- Menke J. Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults. Radiology 2005;236:565-571 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2362041327
- Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT, Scheffel H, Stinn B, Marincek B, et al. Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1809-1817 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0966-1
- Pflederer T, Rudofsky L, Ropers D, Bachmann S, Marwan M, Daniel WG, et al. Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:1045-1050 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1025
- Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y, Hatemura M, Imuta M, Nakaura T, et al. Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise. Radiology 2005;237:945-951 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2373041655
피인용 문헌
- High-Pitch Coronary CT Angiography at 70 kVp Adopting a Protocol of Low Injection Speed and Low Volume of Contrast Medium vol.18, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.5.763
- EVALUATION OF RADIATION ABSORBED DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN DIFFERENT RETROSPECTIVE-ECG GATING ACQUISITION METHODS OF CARDIAC CT ANGIOGRAPHY vol.178, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncx111
- Automatic tube potential selection with tube current modulation in coronary CT angiography: Can it achieve consistent image quality among various individuals? vol.16, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6158