Korean Circulation Journal

  • 제45권3호
  • /
  • Pages.216-224
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1738-5520(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1738-5555(eISSN)
대한심장학회 (The Korean Society of Cardiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Small Left Atrial Size Complicating Percutaneous Transcatheter Device Closure of Secundum Atrial Septal Defect with Conventional Approach

  • Ko, Hong Ki (Department of Pediatrics, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, So Yeon (Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Yu, Jeong Jin (Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Ko, Jae-Kon (Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Young-Hwue (Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2014.10.24
  • 심사 : 2015.02.09
  • 발행 : 2015.05.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background and Objectives: Transcatheter device closure becomes the first option for treating secundum atrial septal defect (ASD), but the conventional method is sometimes unsuccessful even when the defect size indicates the closure to be feasible. To increase the success rate, modified methods have been introduced and used. This study aimed to find predictors for using the modified methods in the device closure of secundum ASDs. Subjects and Methods: Between October 2010 and December 2012, 92 patients with ASDs underwent the transcatheter device closure. We analyzed the sizes of the defect, the surrounding rims, and the ratios of the left atrium (LA) dimensions to the device size in the patients who underwent the procedure either using the conventional or modified methods. Results: Among the 88 successful cases (95.7%), 22 patients (25%) required modified methods (12 using pulmonary vein and 10 using balloon). The modified method group had the larger size of ASDs and smaller posterosuperior rim. The mean ratios of the LA anteroposterior diameter, width, and length to the device size were all significantly smaller in the modified methods group than in the conventional group (1.20 vs. 1.56, 1.32 vs. 1.71, and 1.61 vs. 2.07, respectively). We found that the risk factors for the modified methods were smaller retroaortic rim, larger ASD, and smaller LA dimension/device size. Conclusion: In addition to larger defects and smaller retroaortic rim, the smaller ratios of the LA dimensions to the device size influenced the need for the application of modified methods in the transcatheter device closure of ASDs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Rosas M, Zabal C, Garcia-Montes J, Buendia A, Webb G, Attie F. Transcatheter versus surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect in adults: impact of age at intervention. A concurrent matched comparative study. Congenit Heart Dis 2007;2:148-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0803.2007.00091.x
  2. Du ZD, Hijazi ZM, Kleinman CS, Silverman NH, Larntz K; Amplatzer Investigators. Comparison between transcatheter and surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defect in children and adults: results of a multicenter nonrandomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1836-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01862-4
  3. Dalvi BV, Pinto RJ, Gupta A. New technique for device closure of large atrial septal defects. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;64:102-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.20248
  4. Papa M, Gaspardone A, Fragasso G, et al. Feasibility and safety of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects with deficient posterior rim. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013;81:1180-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.24633
  5. Du ZD, Koenig P, Cao QL, Waight D, Heitschmidt M, Hijazi ZM. Comparison of transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect using the Amplatzer septal occluder associated with deficient versus sufficient rims. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:865-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02709-1
  6. Kammache I, Mancini J, Ovaert C, Habib G, Fraisse A. Feasibility of transcatheter closure in unselected patients with secundum atrial septal defect, using Amplatzer devices and a modified sizing balloon technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;78:665-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.23077
  7. Wahab HA, Almossawy A, Al Bitar I, Hijazi ZM. Tips and tricks to prevent prolapse of the Amplatzer septal occluder through large atrial septal defects. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011;78:1041-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.23182
  8. Huang CF, Fang CY, Ko SF, et al. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects with superior-anterior rim deficiency using Amplatzer septal occluder. J Formos Med Assoc 2007;106:986-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60073-X
  9. Butera G, Romagnoli E, Carminati M, et al. Treatment of isolated secundum atrial septal defects: impact of age and defect morphology in 1,013 consecutive patients. Am Heart J 2008;156:706-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2008.06.008
  10. Park SJ, Kim NK, Kim JO, Yoo BW, Choi JY, Sul JH. Morphologic characteristics and relating factors to the need of technical modification in transcatheter closure of large atrial septal defect (>/=25 mm). Korean Circ J 2010;40:191-6. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2010.40.4.191
  11. Hijazi ZM. Device closure of secundum atrial septal defects: to balloon size or not to balloon size. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2011;4:34-5.
  12. Carlson KM, Justino H, O’Brien RE, et al. Transcatheter atrial septal defect closure: modified balloon sizing technique to avoid overstretching the defect and oversizing the Amplatzer septal occluder. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;66:390-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.20443
  13. Rigatelli G, Dell’avvocata F, Cardaioli P, et al. Safety and long-term outcome of modified intracardiac echocardiography-assisted “noballoon” sizing technique for transcatheter closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defect. J Interv Cardiol 2012;25:628-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8183.2012.00755.x
  14. Wiley JM, White CJ, Uretsky BF. Noncoronary complications of coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;57:257-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.10307
  15. Chessa M, Carminati M, Butera G, et al. Early and late complications associated with transcatheter occlusion of secundum atrial septal defect. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1061-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01711-4
  16. Abaci A, Unlu S, Alsancak Y, Kaya U, Sezenoz B. Short and long term complications of device closure of atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale: meta-analysis of 28,142 patients from 203 studies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013;82:1123-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.24875
  17. Crawford GB, Brindis RG, Krucoff MW, Mansalis BP, Carroll JD. Percutaneous atrial septal occluder devices and cardiac erosion: a review of the literature. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012;80:157-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.24347
  18. Raghuram AR, Krishnan R, Kumar S, Balamurugan K. Complications in atrial septal defect device closure. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:167-9. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2007.165647

피인용 문헌

  1. Procedural Predictors and Outcomes of Percutaneous Secundum Atrial Septal Defect Closure in Children Aged <6 Years vol.85, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.cj-20-1023