Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제9권5호
  • /
  • Pages.957-981
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical modeling and analysis of RC frames subjected to multiple earthquakes

  • Abdelnaby, Adel E. (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Memphis) ;
  • Elnashai, Amr S. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
  • 투고 : 2014.06.16
  • 심사 : 2015.07.13
  • 발행 : 2015.11.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Earthquakes occur as a cluster in many regions around the world where complex fault systems exist. The repeated shaking usually induces accumulative damage to affected structures. Damage accumulation in structural systems increases their level of degradation in stiffness and also reduces their strength. Many existing analytical tools of modeling RC structures lack the salient damage features that account for stiffness and strength degradation resulting from repeated earthquake loading. Therefore, these tools are inadequate to study the response of structures in regions prone to multiple earthquakes hazard. The objective of this paper is twofold: (a) develop a tool that contains appropriate damage features for the numerical analysis of RC structures subjected to more than one earthquake; and (b) conduct a parametric study that investigates the effects of multiple earthquakes on the response of RC moment resisting frame systems. For this purpose, macroscopic constitutive models of concrete and steel materials that contain the aforementioned damage features and are capable of accurately capturing materials degrading behavior, are selected and implemented into fiber-based finite element software. Furthermore, finite element models that utilize the implemented concrete and steel stress-strain hysteresis are developed. The models are then subjected to selected sets of earthquake sequences. The results presented in this study clearly indicate that the response of degrading structural systems is appreciably influenced by strong-motion sequences in a manner that cannot be predicted from simple analysis. It also confirms that the effects of multiple earthquakes on earthquake safety can be very considerable.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abdelnaby, A.E. (2012), "Multiple earthquake effects on degrading reinforced concrete structures", Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
  2. Amadio, C., Fragiacomo, M. and Rajgelj, S. (2003), "The effects of repeated earthquake ground motions on the non-linear response of SDOF systems", J. Earthq. Eng.Struct. Dyn., 32(2), 291-308. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.225
  3. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE 7-05) and Structural Engineering Institute (SEI) (2005), Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, Reston, VA, American Society of Civil Engineers/Structural Engineering Institute.
  4. Aschheim, M. and Black, E. (1999), "Effects of prior earthquake damage on response of simple stiffnessdegrading structures", J. Eng. Spectra, 15(1), 1-24.
  5. Elnashai, A.S., Papanikolaou, V.K. and Lee, D. (2010), "ZEUS NL-a system for inelastic analysis of structures. User's manual", Mid-America Earthquake (MAE) Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana.
  6. Fragiacomo, M., Amadio, C. and Macorini, L. (2004), "Seismic response of steel frames under repeated earthquake ground motions", J. Eng. Struct., 26(13), 2021-2035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.08.005
  7. Garcia, J. and Manriquez, J. (2011), "Evaluation of drift demands in existing steel frames as-recorded farfield and near-filed main shock-aftershock seismic sequences", J. Eng. Struct., 33, 621-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.021
  8. Ghosh, J., Padgett, J. and Sanchez-Silva, M. (2013), "Seismic damage accumulation of highway bridges in earthquake prone regions", Earthq. Spectra, 31(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1193/120812EQS347M
  9. Gomes, A. and Appleton, J. (1996), "Nonlinear cyclic stress-strain relationship of reinforcing bars including buckling", J. Eng. Struct., 19(10), 822-826.
  10. Hancock, J. and Bommer, J.J. (2006), "A state-of-knowledge review of the influence of strong-motion duration on structural damage", Earthq. Spectra, 22(3), 827-845. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2220576
  11. Hatzigeorgious, G. (2010a), "Behavior factors for nonlinear structures subjected to multiple earthquakes", Comput. Struct., 88(5), 309-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.11.006
  12. Hatzigeorgious, G. and Beskos, D. (2009), "Inelastic displacement ratios for SDOF structures subjected to repeated earthquakes", J. Eng. Struct., 31(11), 2744-2755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.07.002
  13. Hatzigeorgious, G. and Liolios, A. (2010b), "Nonlinear behavior of RC frames under repeated strong motions", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 30(10), 1010-1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.04.013
  14. Lee, J. and Fenves, G. (1998), "Plastic damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures", J. Eng. Mech., 124(8), 892-900. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892)
  15. Li, Q. and Ellingwood, B. (2007), "Performance evaluation and damage assessment of steel frame buildings under main shock-aftershock earthquake sequences", J. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(3), 405-427. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.667
  16. Mahin, S. (1980), "Effects of duration and aftershocks on inelastic design earthquakes", Proceedings of the Seventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul.
  17. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1988), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", J. Struct. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 114(8), 1804-1826.
  18. Menegotto, M. and Pinto, P.E. (1973), "Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and nonelastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending", In Proceedings IABSE Symposium on Resistance and ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well-Defined Repeated Loads, Lisbon.
  19. Raghunandan, M., Liel, A., Ryu, H., Luco, N. and Uma, S. (2012), "Aftershock fragility curves and tagging assessments for a mainshock-damaged building", 15 WCEE, Lisbon.
  20. Ruiz-Garcia, J. (2010), "On the influence of strong-ground motion duration on residual displacement demands", Earthq. Struct., 1(4), 327-344. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2010.1.4.327
  21. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE 7-05) and Structural Engineering Institute (SEI) (2005), Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, Reston, VA, American Society of Civil Engineers/Structural Engineering Institute.
  22. ACI 318-08 (2008), "Building code requirements for reinforced concrete and commentary", American Concrete Institute, Detroit.
  23. Miranda, E. (1991), "Seismic evaluation and upgrading of existing buildings", Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Berkley, Berkeley, California.

피인용 문헌

  1. Dynamic response of underground box structure subjected to explosion seismic wave vol.10, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.3.669
  2. Fragility curves for RC frames under multiple earthquakes vol.98, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.04.013
  3. Seismic design requirements for reinforced concrete piers considering aftershock-induced seismic hazard 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1418009
  4. Effect of different aspects of multiple earthquakes on the nonlinear behavior of RC structures vol.92, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.11.006
  5. Performance based assessment of steel frame structures by different material models vol.17, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-017-9013-x
  6. Impact of initial damage path and spectral shape on aftershock collapse fragility of RC frames vol.15, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.15.5.529
  7. Analytical Study on the Loading Characteristics of the Distribution Panel Installed Anchorage under the Seismic vol.29, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5050/ksnve.2019.29.6.753
  8. Cyclic Pushover Method for Seismic Assessment under Multiple Earthquakes vol.35, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1193/010518eqs001m
  9. Seismic response of RC frames under far-field mainshock and near-fault aftershock sequences vol.72, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.72.3.395
  10. Evaluation of anchorage performance of the switchboard cabinet under seismic loading condition vol.12, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814020926309