The Effect of Mechanical Horseback-Riding Training according to Velocity on Trunk Muscles Thickness in Healthy Adult

  • Received : 2015.09.15
  • Accepted : 2015.10.25
  • Published : 2015.10.25

Abstract

Purpose: The study was to determine whether mechanical horseback-riding training according to velocity may improve trunk muscles thickness in healthy adults. Methods: Twenty healthy adults participated in this study. The subjects were divided into 2 groups as follows: 10 subjects in high velocity mechanical horseback-riding training (MHRT) and 10 subjects in low velocity MHRT. Subjects in all groups performed a total of 18 sessions 3 times a day for 20 minutes and this experiment lasted for 6 weeks. Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon Signed Rank test were used in analysis the results of trunk muscle thickness. Ultrasonography was performed to evaluate for thickness of rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), transverse abdominis (TrA), erector spine (ES), and multifidus (MF) in trunk muscles. Results: Results on the changes of EO, IO, and ES of high velocity MHRT showed a significant increase after 6 weeks (p<0.05). Regarding the changes of EO, IO, ES, TrA, and MF of low velocity MHRT, a significant increase was observed after 6 weeks (p<0.05). The differences in change of trunk muscle thickness before training, after 6-week training between groups, TrA and MF of low velocity MHRT were significantly higher (p<0.05). Conclusion: Based on the results of the current study, the velocity of MHRT was shown to affect change of trunk muscle thickness in healthy adults. In particular, low velocity MHRT may serve as a useful method to provide for TrA, MF thickness improvement related to trunk stabilizers.

Keywords

References

  1. Moseley GL, Hodges PW, Gandevia SC. Deep and superficial fibers of the lumbar multifidus muscle are differentially active during voluntary arm movements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(2):E29-36. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200201150-00013
  2. Urquhart DM, Hodges PW, Allen TJ et al. Abdominal muscle recruitment during a range of voluntary exercises. Man Ther. 2005;10(2):144-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2004.08.011
  3. Mannion AF, Pulkovski N, Toma V et al. Abdominal muscle size and symmetry at rest and during abdominal hollowing exercises in healthy control subjects. J Anat. 2008;213(2):173-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00946.x
  4. O'Sullivan PB, Grahamslaw KM, Kendell M et al. The effect of different standing and sitting postures on trunk muscle activity in a pain-free population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(11):1238-44. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200206010-00019
  5. McGill SM, Grenier S, Kavcic N et al. Coordination of muscle activity to assure stability of the lumbar spine. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003;13(4): 353-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00043-9
  6. Kavcic N, Grenier S, McGill SM. Determining the stabilizing role of individual torso muscles during rehabilitation exercises. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(11):1254-65. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200406010-00016
  7. Sung KH, Kim MJ, Sok HK. The effect of progressive resistance exercise between laser discectomy and non-op group in hivd for 12wks. The Korean Journal of Sports Medicine. 1999;17(1):165-75.
  8. Emshoff R, Bertram S, Strobl H. Ultrasonographic cross-sectional characteristics of muscles of the head and neck. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;87(1):93-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70302-1
  9. Chang JS, Lee JH. Comparison of cervical flexor muscles thickness during cranial-cervical flexor exercise according to pressure levels and eye directions in healthy subjects. J Kor Phys Ther.27(1):50-4.
  10. Chi-Fishman G, Hicks JE, Cintas HM et al. Ultrasound imaging distinguishes between normal and weak muscle. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(6):980-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.07.008
  11. Pillen S, Arts IMP, Zwarts MJ. Muscle ultrasound in neuromuscular disorders. Muscle Nerve. 2008;37(6):679-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.21015
  12. Hosaka Y, Nagasaki M, Bajotto G et al. Effects of daily mechanical horseback riding on insulin sensitivity and resting metabolism in middle-aged type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2010;72(3-4):129-37.
  13. Choi HJ, Kim KJ, Nam KW. The effects of a horseback riding simulation exercise on the spinal alignment of children with cerebral palsy. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2014;26(3):209-15.
  14. Kang HK, Chang SK. The effect of robo-horseback riding exercise on trunk muscle activity ratios in patients with low back pain. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2012;24(6):393-7.
  15. Choi AY, Cho WS. The effects of mechanical horseback riding exercise on the dynamic balance in patients with cerebral infarction. J Kor Phys Ther. 2014;26(2):123-9.
  16. Choi HJ, Nam KW. The effect of horseback riding simulator on static balance of cerebral palsy. J Kor Phys Ther. 2014;26(4):269-73. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.269
  17. Shinomiya Y, Wang S, Ishida K et al. Development and muscle strength training evaluation for horseback riding therapeutic equipment. J Rob Mechatron. 2002;14(6):597-603. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2002.p0597
  18. Snider L, Korner-Bitensky N, Kammann C et al. Horseback riding as therapy for children with cerebral palsy: Is there evidence of its effectiveness? Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2007;27(2):5-23.
  19. Shinomiya Y, Sekine O, Hojo T et al. Development of horseback riding therapeutic equipment and verification of effect on increase in muscle strength. MEW Technical Report. 2001(76):69-74.
  20. Quint C, Toomey M. Powered saddle and pelvic mobility: An investigation into the effects on pelvic mobility of children with cerebral palsy of a powered saddle which imitates the movements of a walking horse. Physiotherapy. 1998;84(8):376-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61458-7
  21. Oh WY, Ryew CC, Kim JH et al. Kinematic analysis of horse-riding posture during walking and rising trot in jeju horse. Journal of Sport and Leisure Studies. 2009;38(2):741-54.
  22. Kim JH, Chang SK. The effects of robo-horseback riding with changes of pelvic tilting and speeds on muscle activities of trunk and lower limb. J Kor Phys Ther. 2014;26(5):290-5.
  23. Sung BJ, Chung DS, Kim BH et al. The change of HR, VO2, VE, MET and calory expenditure in horseback-riding simulator's walking types. Korean Journal of Sport Science. 2004;15(1):1-13.
  24. Ota M, Ikezoe T, Kaneoka K et al. Age-related changes in the thickness of the deep and superficial abdominal muscles in women. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;55(2):e26-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2012.03.007
  25. Vasseljen O, Dahl HH, Mork PJ et al. Muscle activity onset in the lumbar multifidus muscle recorded simultaneously by ultrasound imaging and intramuscular electromyography. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006; 21(9): 905-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.05.003
  26. Ainscough-Potts AM, Morrissey MC, Critchley D. The response of the transverse abdominis and internal oblique muscles to different postures. Man Ther. 2006;11(1):54-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2005.03.007
  27. Nankervis K, Lovett T, Hodson-Tole E et al. A preliminary investigation of rider position during walk, trot and canter. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology. 2005;2(2):71-6. https://doi.org/10.1079/ECP200444
  28. Lim JH, Park JS, Cho WS. The effect of mechanical horseback-riding training velocity on vestibular functions and static postural balance in healthy adults. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2013;25(5):288-96.
  29. Aruin AS, Latash ML. Directional specificity of postural muscles in feed-forward postural reactions during fast voluntary arm movements. Exp Brain Res. 1995;103(2):323-32.
  30. Eriksson Crommert AE, Thorstensson A. Trunk muscle reactions to sudden unexpected and expected perturbations in the absence of upright postural demand. Exp Brain Res. 2009;196(3):385-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1860-z
  31. Lee SK. The effects of indoor horseback-riding exercise on health-related fitness, serum lipids, and defecation satisfaction of female collegiate students. Korea Sport Research. 2005;16(3):153-60.
  32. Hodges PW, Pengel LH, Herbert RD et al. Measurement of muscle contraction with ultrasound imaging. Muscle Nerve. 2003;27(6):682-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.10375
  33. Kiesel KB, Uhl TL, Underwood FB et al. Measurement of lumbar multifidus muscle contraction with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging. Man Ther. 2007;12(2):161-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2006.06.011
  34. Sung YH, Kim KJ, Yu BK. Therapeutic effects of hippotherapy simulator on trunk function in patients with stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2012;16(2):333-46.
  35. Souza GM, Baker LL, Powers CM. Electromyographic activity of selected trunk muscles during dynamic spine stabilization exercises. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(11):1551-7. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.26082
  36. Baek IH, Kim BJ. The effects of horse riding simulation training on stroke patients’ balance ability and abdominal muscle thickness changes. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(8):1293-6. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.1293
  37. Westerling D. A study of physical demands in riding. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1983;50(3):373-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00423243
  38. Vasseljen O, Fladmark AM. Abdominal muscle contraction thickness and function after specific and general exercises: A randomized controlled trial in chronic low back pain patients. Man Ther. 2010;15(5):482-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2010.04.004
  39. Yu CH, Hong CU, Kang SR et al. Analysis of basal physical fitness and lumbar muscle function according to indoor horse riding exercise. Biomed Mater Eng. 2014;24(6):2395-405.