Journal of the Korean housing association (한국주거학회논문집)

The Korean Housing Association (한국주거학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison of the Differences in Amenities at the Housing Complex between Regular Multi-family Housing and Urbanistic Housing for Improving Residential Quality of the Urbanistic Housing

도시형생활주택의 거주성 향상을 위한 일반 공동주택 단지와의 공용공간 비교 연구

  • Received : 2015.04.02
  • Accepted : 2015.10.08
  • Published : 2015.10.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research was aimed at finding clues of improving residential quality of the Urbanistic Housing which was introduced for the small household of 1-2 residents. It was the communal amenities in multi-family housing complexes that this research concentrated on. Therefore 20 Urbanistic Housing complexes and 11 regular multi-family housing complexes were chosen as the subjects, and all of them were constructed in same period of date and composed of similar number of household units. Compared varieties and design programs of the communal amenities in Urbanistic Housing complexes to those in regular multi-family housing complexes, there were noticeable differences that far less various communal amenities and bland layouts in Urbanistic Housing complexes than in regular multi-family housing complexes. To become a quality residence, it is necessary that Urbanistic Housing are also required to provide certain level of communal amenities, not as much as regular housing for regular household but much more than Quasi-housing, the minimum residence. And it should be ensured by the legal system to make it more practical.

Keywords

References

  1. Bahn, J. H (2012). Socio-economic features and changes of one person household. Journal of the Korea Labor Institute, 85, 55-67.
  2. Kang, S. J., Kim, J. Y., & Ham, S. I. (2012). Relationship between the changes in researches about multi-familyhousing community and the social background factors. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 23(4), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2012.23.4.019
  3. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation (2015). www.law.go.kr
  4. Lee, E., & Lee, S.H (2015). A Research for Regulation Related Supply Trends of the Small Housing: Urbanistic Housing in Seoul. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 31(3), 69-76.
  5. Park, N. H., & Kim, J. Y. (2004). The Evaluation of the Residential Environmental Qualities in Bundang Residents. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 15(6), 27-35.
  6. Park, S. B., & Choi, I. Y. (2012). A Study on Evaluation Items for Shared Space Performance of Apartment in Korea. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 28(10), 49-56.
  7. Park, Y. G., Kim, H. J., & Kang, I. H. (2005). Focused on Qualitative Analysis of Residents' and Facility Managers' Experiences=A POE Process Model for Super-Tall Residential Building. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 21(11), 137-146.
  8. Shin, H. K., & Jo, I. S. (2012). The Improvement of Related Legal Systems of Community Facilities for Community Activation Korean Housing Association. Journal of Korean Housing Association, 23(2), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2012.23.2.047
  9. Seoul Institute (2012). A research on current state of and policy suggestions for Urbanistic Housing in Seoul. (Seoul Ins. 2012-PR-69). Seoul: Seoul Institute.
  10. Statistics Korea (2010). Housing Census. www.kostat.go.kr.