The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical evaluation of retained preload and cement washout in screw- and cement-retained implant prosthesis

나사 시멘트 유지형 임플란트 보철물의 잔여 전부하 및 시멘트 파손에 대한 임상평가

  • Chung, Chae-Heon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Son, Mee-Kyoung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Seok-Gyu (Department of Prosthodontics, Samsung Medical Center, College of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 정재헌 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 손미경 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김석규 (성균관대학교 의과대학 치과학교실)
  • Received : 2015.06.16
  • Accepted : 2015.08.12
  • Published : 2015.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of screw- and cement-retained implant prosthesis (SCP) design in terms of retained preload of abutment screws and cement washout. Materials and methods: Patients with the partial posterior edentulous areas comprised the study group. Implants were placed, and SCPs were delivered after 3 to 6 months healing. Follow-up examinations were performed. The implant survival rate and the prosthetic success rate were evaluated. The retained preload ratio of abutment screws and the prosthetic decementation ratio were measured. Results: Twenty one SCPs (forty three implants)in twenty patients were followed up to 64 months. All of the implants survived during the follow-up period (mean follow-up: 34 months). The prosthetic success rate was 100 % considering no abutment, screw, porcelain or metal frame fractures, as well as no screw loosening. The retained preload ratio of SCPs at the end of follow-up period was 97.61% (${\pm}16.29$) and the decementation ratio was 9.5 %. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this clinical study, SCP design showed favorable short-term clinical performances in respect of screw loosening and cement washout.

목적: 이 연구의 목적은 지대주 나사 잔여 전부하 비율과 시멘트 파손유무 평가를 통해 나사 시멘트 유지형 임플란트 보철물(screw- and cement-retained implant prosthesis: SCP)의 임상적 수행 능력을 알아보는 것이다. 재료 및 방법: 구치부 부분 무치악 환자들을 대상으로 임플란트가 식립되었으며 3 - 6개월의 치유기간 후 SCP임플란트 보철물이 장착되었다. 추적관찰을 통해 임플란트의 생존율이 평가되고 보철물 성공률도 평가되었다. SCP 보철물의 나사 잔여 전부하 비율 및 시멘트 파손 비율이 측정되었다. 결과: 20명의 환자로부터 21개의 SCP보철물(43개의 임플란트)이 최대 64개월까지 관찰되었다. 관찰기간(평균 34개월) 동안 골융합에 실패한 임플란트는 하나도 없었다. 지대주, 나사, 도재 혹은 보철물 프레임 파절이나 나사 풀림 등은 없었으므로 보철물 성공율은 100%였다. SCP 보철물의 나사 잔여 전부하 비율은 97.61% (${\pm}16.29$), 그리고 시멘트 파손비율은 9.5%이었다. 결론: 본 실험의 한계 내에서, 나사 풀림과 시멘트 파손이란 관점에서 SCP 디자인의 임플란트 보철물은 양호한 단기 임상 결과를 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70203-8
  2. Voitik AJ. The Kulzer abutment luting; Kal technique. A direct assembly framework method for osseointegrated implant prostheses. Implant Soc 1991;2:11-4.
  3. Karl M, Winter W, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:30-7.
  4. Watanabe F1, Uno I, Hata Y, Neuendorff G, Kirsch A. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:209-18.
  5. Guichet DL, Caputo AA, Choi H, Sorensen JA. Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw- or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:239-46.
  6. Keith SE, Miller BH, Woody RD, Higginbottom FL. Mar ginal discrepancy of screw-retained and cemented metal-ceramic crowns on implants abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:369-78.
  7. Wood MR, Vermilyea SG; Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. A review of selected dental literature on evidence-based treatment planning for dental implants: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:447-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.08.003
  8. Chee W, Felton DA, Johnson PF , Sullivan DY. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: which is better? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:137-41.
  9. Taylor TD, Agar JR, Vogiatzi T. Implant prosthodontics: current perspective and future directions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:66-75.
  10. Preiskel HW, Tsolka P. Telescopic prostheses for implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:352-7.
  11. Lindstrom H, Preiskel H. The implant-supported telescopic prosthesis: a biomechanical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:34-42.
  12. Preiskel HW, Tsolka P. Cement- and screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: up to 10 years of follow-up of a new design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:87-91.
  13. Kim SG, Park JU, Jeong JH, Bae C, Bae TS, Chee W. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:1061-7.
  14. Kim SG, Chung CH, Son MK. Effect of cement washout on loosening of abutment screws and vice versa in screw- and cement-retained implant-supported dental prosthesis. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:207-13. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.207
  15. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Sadler JP, McKay ML. Comparison of screw loosening, rotation, and deflection among three implant designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:270-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80134-9
  16. Sailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE, Siegenthaler D, Holderegger C, Hammerle CH. Randomized controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for canine and posterior single-tooth implant reconstructions: preliminary results at 1 year of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:219-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01636.x
  17. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, Sammartino G, Galindo-Moreno P, Trisi P, Steigmann M, Rebaudi A, Palti A, Pikos MA, Schwartz-Arad D, Choukroun J, Gutierrez-Perez JL, Marenzi G, Valavanis DK. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008;17:5-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3181676059
  18. Park JK, Choi JU, Jeon YC, Choi KS, Jeong CM. Effects of abutment screw coating on implant preload. J Prosthodont 2010;19:458-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00595.x
  19. Butignon LE, Basilio Mde A, Pereira Rde P, Arioli Filho JN. Influence of three types of abutments on preload values before and after cyclic loading with structural analysis by scanning electron microscopy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:e161-70. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2481
  20. Khraisat A, Hashimoto A, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Effect of lateral cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening of an external hexagon implant system. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:326-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.01.001
  21. Chaar MS, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:697-711. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02209.x
  22. De Boever AL, Keersmaekers K, Vanmaele G, Kerschbaum T, Theuniers G, De Boever JA. Prosthetic complications in fixed endosseous implant-borne reconstructions after an observations period of at least 40 months. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:833-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01638.x
  23. Hooshmand T, Mohajerfar M, Keshvad A, Motahhary P. Microleakage and marginal gap of adhesive cements for noble alloy full cast crowns. Oper Dent 2011;36:258-65. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-253-L
  24. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns. Dent Mater 2005;21:445-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.009
  25. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  26. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:121-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00212-9
  27. Nissan J, Narobai D, Gross O, Ghelfan O, Chaushu G. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported partial restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:1102-7.
  28. Wittneben JG, Millen C, Bragger U. Clinical performance of screwversus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions-a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:84-98. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g2.1
  29. Tsuge T, Hagiwara Y. Influence of lateral-oblique cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening of internal and external hexagon implants. Dent Mater J 2009;28:373-81. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.373

Cited by

  1. Effect of internal gap on retentivity in implant fixed prosthesis with lingual slot vol.56, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2018.56.3.206