DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Engel Coefficient, Angel Coefficient and Schwabe Index Influencing Household Head's Life Satisfaction : according to Income Quintile

가계의 엥겔계수, 엔젤계수 및 슈바베계수가 생활만족도에 미치는 영향 : 소득계층을 중심으로

  • Oh, Yun-hee (Department of Consumers' Life Information, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Soon-Mi (Department of Consumers' Life Information, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2015.05.15
  • Accepted : 2015.09.19
  • Published : 2015.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of Engel coefficient, Angel coefficient and Schwabe index influencing Household head's life satisfaction. For this study, the data from the 8th analysis of the 2013 Korea Welfare Panel Survey conducted by Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs were used. For the sample, 903 male Household heads with children under the age of 18, were selected. For statistical analysis, SPSS program (Ver. 21.0) was used. And for statistical methods, frequency and percentile, mean and standard deviation, Pearson's correlation, one way analysis of variance, Duncan's multiple range tests, multiple regression analysis were used. The findings are as follows. First, as a results of analyzing the food costs, education costs and housing costs depending on Income Quintile, the food costs and education costs in the 5th Income Quintile compared with other Income Quintile, were highest. Also, the highest housing cost was in the 2nd Income Quintile, while the least housing cost was in the 1st Income Quintile. Second, by analyzing the differences of Engel coefficient, Angel coefficient and Schwabe index according to Income Quintile, the results show that Engel coefficient and Schwabe index decreases as Income Quintile increases, and Angel coefficient increases as Income Quintile becomes higher. Third, the level of HH's life satisfaction according to Income Quintile, 1st Income Quintile, 2nd Income Quintile, 4th Income Quintile, 3rd Income Quintile, 5th Income Quintile in order, increased. Fourth, as the result of analyzing the influence of Variables related to household and demographics about Engel coefficient, Angel coefficient and Schwabe index, it was shown that the variables effecting Engel coefficient, Angel coefficient, and Schwabe index are age, occupations, Number of workers, House ownership, Income Quintile. Fifth, As a result of analyzing the Variables effecting life satisfaction, especially while Schwabe index is not that significant, Engel coefficient and Angel coefficient are shown to have a significant influence. Therefore, the influence of Food costs and education costs can be confirmed.

Keywords

References

  1. Atkinson, R., & Kintrea, K. (2000). Owner-occupation, social mix and neighbourhood impacts. Policy and Politics, 28(1), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1332/0305573002500857
  2. Baek, H., & Ahn, S. Y. (2012). The difference of the effects of private tutoring expenditure on the change of consumption structure of households depending on income bracket. Korea Social Policy Review, 19(3), 9-47.
  3. Baek, S.-J., & Lim, Y.-J. (2013). Social support mediates the relationship between kindness and life satisfaction. The Korea Journal of Youth Counseling, 21(2), 25-36.
  4. Blanchfolewer, D., & Oswald, A. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359-1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00168-8
  5. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E.., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life : Perception, evaluation and satisfaction. Russell Sage Foundation.
  6. Choe, H. (2000). Comparative analysis of consumption expenditures by occupation of the household head. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 18(1), 167-183.
  7. Choi, H.-J., & Lee, Y.-B. (2006). Life satisfaction scale for elderly : revisited. Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 58(3), 27-49.
  8. Choi, O.-G. (2011) The categorization of consumption for elderly in Korea: Focused on poverty and receipt of the public assistance. Journal of Welfare for the Aged, 51, 277-296.
  9. Choi, S. K. (2014). Korean household angel coefficient characteristics and implications (Vol.595). Korea: Hyundai Research Institute Weekly Economic Review.
  10. Cho, G., & Yoo, J. S. (2013). KERI insight (12-09). Korea: Korea Economic Research Institute.
  11. Choi, S. K., & Lee, J. H. (2015). Korean middle class quality of life changes (Vol.2015 No.6). Korea: Hyundai Research Institute issue report.
  12. Chosunbiz article. (2014.2.13). Retrieved from http://biz.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2014/02/13/2014021300586.html.
  13. Chun, H. J., & Lee, Y. S. (2007). Income and consumption expenditure patterns of urban salary and wage earner's household over the family life cycle. Journal of Korean Family Resource Management Association, 11(1), 65-81.
  14. Chung, S.-K. (2014). The lifestyle and quality of life (QOL) of urban residents. Journal of Social Science, 25(2), 137-161.
  15. Diener, E. (1984). The science of well-being. Social Indicators Research Series, 37, 11-58.
  16. Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? some empirical evidence. in nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of moses abramovitz, edited by P. David and M. Reder. New York: Academic Press.
  17. Easterlin, R. A. (2006). Life cycle happiness and its sources intersections of psychology, economics, and demography. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 463-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.05.002
  18. Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness-income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(52), 22463. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015962107
  19. Economic Review. (2015.8.10.). Retrieved from http://www.econovill.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=256700
  20. Hagerty, M. R., & Veenhoven, R. (2003). Wealth and happiness revisited - growing national income does go with greater happiness. Social Indicators Research, 64, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024790530822
  21. hankookilbo article. (2012.6.5). Retrieved from http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=102&oid=038&aid=0002264900
  22. Hankyung dictionary. Retrieved from http://s.hankyung.com/dic/
  23. Hong, S. H., & Kwak, I. S. (2014). Effects of intergenerational support exchange with their adult children on the happiness of the middle-aged parents. Journal of Korean Family Resource Management Association, 18(1), 69-91.
  24. Hwang, D. S. (2001). Dynamic analysis on poverty since the economic crisis. Quarterly Journal of Labor Policy, 1(2), 31-59.
  25. Hwang, E., & Sohn, J. (2013). Consumption life indicators in Korea. 2013. Korea: Korea Consumer Agency.
  26. Hwang, E.-A., & Lee, S. S. (1999). A study on the consumption expenditure and patterns of urban households. Family and Environment Research, 37(8), 117-132.
  27. Jang, I. S. (2012). Cost of living index after reducing substitution bias and reflecting group-wise differences: Measurement and applications. Korean Journal of Public Finance, 5(4), 1-35.
  28. Jeon, B. J., & Choi, E. Y. (2015). Effects of characteristics of social exclusion, housing tenure type in life satisfaction of older adults and buffering effect of social network. Journal of Social Science, 26(1), 77-107.
  29. Jeong, J.-H. (2012). The factors influencing the life satisfaction and depression between urban and rural elderly. Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal, 21(6), 121-128.
  30. Jeong, Y. S. (1994). Household economic stability of the insular areas and quality of life: Hansan island area. Journal of Consumer Studies, 5(1), 57-69.
  31. Jeong, Y. S. (1999). A study on the impact of the consumption satisfaction on the elderly's quality of life: Pre-elderly and the elderly. Journal of Consumer Studies, 10(1), 43-59.
  32. Ju, W. (2012). Housing cost burden (schwabe index) increasing rapidly (Vol.78). Korea: Hyundai Research Institute issue report.
  33. Kahng, S. K. (2012). An exploratory study on generation differences in life satisfaction and related factors: generational comparisons using the Korean welfare panel study. Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies, 43(4), 91-119. https://doi.org/10.16999/kasws.2012.43.4.91
  34. Kalish, R. (1975). Late adulthood: Perspectives on human development, Berkely, CA: Cole Publishing co.
  35. Kang, E.-T., & Ma, K.-R. (2009). A study on the factors affecting household choices of dwelling: Focused on the characteristics of home owning renters. Housing Studies Review, 17(1), 5-22.
  36. Kang, S. J. (2010). The analysis on the determinants of life-satisfaction in Korea. Economics Research, 58(1), 5-36.
  37. Korea Energy Economics Institute (2012). Energy consumption Survey 2011. Korea: Korea Energy Economics Institute.
  38. Kim, B., Chung, C., & Park, M.-H. (2008). Shift of engel curve for the self-employed and income under-reporting. Korean Economic Review, 56(3), 151-170.
  39. Kim, D. B., Park, E. Y., & Kim, S. W. (2009). The study on life satisfaction of older people by the asset types: Focused on the moderation effects of economic activity. Social Welfare Policy, 36(3), 471-494.
  40. Kim, G. S. (2015). A lease on deposit.monthly rent and schwabe index trend analysis (Vol.638). Korea : Hyundai Research Institute Weekly Economic Review.
  41. Kim, H. J. (2013). The polarization of educational spending in Korea(1990-2012). MARXISM 21, 10(4), 45-66.
  42. Kim, H. (2014). Relative concern: Pros and cons and lessons to be learned (No.44). Korea: Korea Development Institute KDI FOCUS.
  43. Kim, H.-R., & Choe, H. (1999). The influences of household income and asset in the consumption expenditures according to housing tenure. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 37(10), 91-106.
  44. Kim, H.-S., & Kim, T.-H. (2008). Housing welfare policy based on minimum housing standards and affordability. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 59, 223-245. https://doi.org/10.15793/kspr.2008.59..011
  45. Kim, K.-O. (1988). The effect of education on efficiency in consumption. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 26(1), 123-136.
  46. Kim, S. (2013). Changes in household expenditure structure in the transition to dual-earner society in Korea: comparing dual-earner and one-earner households' consumption. Family and Culture, 25(4), 34-59.
  47. Kim, S. W., & Cho, H. S. (2013). The impact of financial condition on life satisfaction for Korean baby boomers - comparison between employed and non-employed baby boomers. Financial Planning Review, 6(3), 1-33.
  48. Kim, S.-M. (2005). Dual earner families' child care alternatives and policy implications. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 23(6), 105-116
  49. Kim, Y. S., & Sim, M. Y. (1994). An analysis of housing consumption expenditure in urban salary and wage - earners' households - from 1982 to 1992 -. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 32(2), 1-15.
  50. Kwak, I. S. (2013). Study on family strength and happiness of the pre-elderly and the elderly. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Associatio, 51(1), 1-16.
  51. Kwak, I.-S., & Kim, S.-M. (1999). A study on the total housing cost of households living in rental house. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 37(2), 127-144.
  52. Kwon, K. & Oh, J. (2014). The implications of by age changes in the propensity to consume and macroeconomic. Economic Outlook, 31(1), 51-61.
  53. Lee, E, & Park, D. (2011). Differences of consumption level and satisfaction of living between Korean middle class and the other classes. Journal of Korean Cultural Industries, 11(2), 41-64.
  54. Lee, H. G., & Shim, S. J. (2010). An exploratory study on reconstruction of social indicator system. Journal of Social Research, 11(1), 47-77.
  55. Lee, H. S. (2000). Impact of income on subjective quality of life. Korea Journal of Population Studies, 23(1), 91-117.
  56. Lee, H.-J. (2012). Housing cost burden of single- or two-person households in their 20s and 30s in the united states. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 23(2), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2012.23.2.069
  57. Lee, H.-S., & Han, K.-C., & Jeon, G.-B. (2013). Impact on quality of life of single-parent female head of household economic stress. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 13(3), 174-183. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.03.174
  58. Lee, J. (2014). Financial stability report (ISSN 1975-6607). Korea: Bank of Korea.
  59. Lee, J. J. (2008). 우리는 행복한가. Korea: Hangilsa.
  60. Lee, S. S. (2003). Focused on income classification = the effects of household financial system on private education expenses. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 41(11), 151-169.
  61. Lee, Y. G., & Yang, S. J. (1999). For urban salary and wage earner households = an analysis of the relationships of food expenditures and household socioeonomic characteristics. Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 8(1), 63-79.
  62. Lim, Y.-J. (2012). Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale among Korean police officers, university students, and adolescents. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 31(3), 877-896.
  63. Meeks, C. (1984). Housing. Prentice-Hall.
  64. Moon, J,-Y. (2012). A study of the easterlin paradox-with special references to satiation point-. Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 64(10), 53-77.
  65. Moon, S.-J., & Joung, S.-H.(1995). A studies of consumption expenditure patterns: Between single mother family and adoptive parents in Seoul area. Journal of Consumer Studies, 6(2), 53-65.
  66. Morris, E. W., & Winter, M. (1978). Housing, family and society, New York : John wiley and sons.
  67. Nam, K. G. (2008). Does the rich family spend more share of expenditure to private tutoring? - The relationship between total consumption expenditure and the share of private tutoring cost -. Journal of Korean Economic Development, 14(1), 27-53.
  68. Nickols , S . Y., & Fox, K. D. (1983). Buying time and saving time: Strategies for managing household production. Journal of Consumer Research 10, 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1086/208959
  69. OECD. (2014). Better Life Index 2013. Retrieved from http://stats.oecd.org.
  70. Park, J. (2014.). Navercast Engel's coefficient. Retrieved from http://navercast.naver.com/contents.nhn?rid=235&contents_id=58319.
  71. Park, J.-Y. (2006). An analysis of the financial performance according to private education expenditures. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 24(6), 61-77.
  72. PMG common sense dictionary. Retrieved from http://terms.naver.com.
  73. Rohe, W. L., & Stewart, L. S. (1996). Homeownership and neighborhood stability. Housing Policy Debate, 7(1), 37-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.1996.9521213
  74. Samuelson, P. (1938). A note on the pure theory of consumers' behaviour. Economica, 5, 61-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/2548836
  75. Schuessler, K. F., & Fisher. G. A. (1985). Quality of life research and sociology. Annual Review of Sociology. 11, 129-149. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.11.080185.001021
  76. Seok, J. E. Kim, B. K., & Noh, H. J. (2012). Effect of married women's economic activity type on the private education expenditure for children in Korea. Korean Social Security Studies, 28(3), 87-120.
  77. Sohn, S.-H., & Yang, S.-J. (1999). Determinants of house-hold food consumption: Food at home and food away from home. Journal of the Korean Society of Dietary Culture, 14(5), 497-505.
  78. Song, K. S., & Gwon, Y. H. (2008). A study on quality of life's determinants of metropolitan areas. Journal of Local Government Studies, 20(4), 87-107.
  79. Statistical Research Institute. (2014). Korean social trends 2014 (No. 11-1240245-000014-10). Korea: Statistical Research Institute.
  80. Statistics Korea, Financial Supervisory Service Korea & Statistics Korea. (2015). Result on the survey of household finances and living conditions 2014 (ISBN. 9772233695803). Korea: Statistics Korea, Financial Supervisory Service Korea & Statistics Korea.
  81. Statistics Korea. (2015). Korean quality of life. Retrieved from http://qol.kostat.go.kr/blife/main.do.
  82. Statistics Korea. (2015). The trend of household 2012. Retrieved from http://kostat.go.kr/portal/Korea/kor_nw/2/4/3/index.board?bmode=read&bSeq=&aSeq=333733&pageNo=1&rowNum=10&navCount=10&currPg=&sTarget=title&sTxt.
  83. Stevenson, B., & J. Wolfers. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity.
  84. Stiglitz, Joseph E., Amartya Sen and Jean-Paul Fitoussi. (2008). Commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. CMEPSP-Issue Paper.
  85. Sung, Y.-A., & Yang, S. J. (1997). A Comparison of consumption expenditure patterns and their determinants of elderly and nonelderly households. Family and Environment Research, 35(5), 103-117.
  86. UN (2015). World happiness report 2015. France : Sustainable Development Solutions Network
  87. Walden, M. (2005). Absolute and relative consumption of married U.S. Households in 1960 and 1996: The cleavers meet the taylors. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 36(1), 77-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2002.tb00421.x
  88. Wikipedia. Retrieved from http://ko.wikipedia.org.
  89. Yang, S. J., & Lee, Y. G. (1997). Factors analysis of household expenditure on education: Focusing on the number of children and child sex ratio. Journal of Consumer Studies, 8(2), 81-101.
  90. Yang, S. J., & Yuh, Y. (2000). Human capital and consumption structure in husband - wife households. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 38(8), 141-157.
  91. Yang, S.-J., & Yuh, Y. (1998). Wife's occupations and household expenditure patterns. Journal of Family Culture Studies Sangmyung University, 12, 1-12.
  92. Yeongnam article. (2015.7.28). Retrieved from http://www.yeongnam.com/mnews/newsview.do?mode=newsView&newskey=20150728.010310845590001
  93. Yoo, T. K., & Ban, J. H. (2012). A study on the change in quality of life among mature-aged in Korea. Social Science Research Review Kyungsung University, 28(2), 349-372.
  94. Yoo, J. M. (2012). The study of happiness determinants on the elderly according to sex and couple existence. Korean journal of youth studies, 19(3), 375-400.

Cited by

  1. Income Poverty and Multidimensional Poverty of Elderly Households vol.56, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2018.014
  2. Consumption Quintile Effect on Per Capita Consumption Expenditure of Middle and Older Elderly Households vol.57, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2019.010