DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Interpretation of Genotype × Environment Interaction of Sesame Yield Using GGE Biplot Analysis

  • Shim, Kang-Bo (Crop Cultivation & Environment Research Division, NICS) ;
  • Shin, Seong-Hyu (Crop Cultivation & Environment Research Division, NICS) ;
  • Shon, Ji-Young (Crop Cultivation & Environment Research Division, NICS) ;
  • Kang, Shin-Gu (Crop Cultivation & Environment Research Division, NICS) ;
  • Yang, Woon-Ho (Crop Cultivation & Environment Research Division, NICS) ;
  • Heu, Sung-Gi (Crop Cultivation & Environment Research Division, NICS)
  • 투고 : 2015.02.16
  • 심사 : 2015.09.09
  • 발행 : 2015.09.30

초록

The AMMI (additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) and GGE (genotype main effect and genotype by environment interaction) biplot which were accounted for a substantial part of total sum of square in the analysis of variance suggested to be more appropriate models for explaining G $\times$ E interaction. The grain yield of total ten sesame genotypes was significantly affected by environment which explained 61% of total variation, whereas genotype and genotype x environment interaction (G $\times$ E) were explained 16%, 24% respectively. From the results of experiment, three genotypes Miryang49, Koppoom and Ansan were unstable, whereas other three genotypes Kyeongbuk18, Miryang50 and Kanghuk which were shorter projections to AEA ordinate were relatively stable over the environments. Yangbak which was closeness to the mean yield and short projection of the genotype marker lines was regarded as genotype indicating good performance with stability. Ansan, Miryang48 and Yangbaek showed the best performance in the environments of Naju, Suwon, Iksan and Andong. Similarly, genotype Miyrang47 exhibited the best performance in the environments of Chuncheon and Miryang. Andong is the closest to the ideal environment, and therefore, is the most desirable among eight environments.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Allard, R. W. and A. D. Bradshaw. 1964. Implications of genotypeenvironment interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Sci. 4 : 503-507. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400050021x
  2. Asnake, W. N., M Henry, Z. Temesgen, and T. Girma. 2013. Additive main effects and multiplicative interactions model (AMMI) and genotype main effect and genotype by environment interaction (GGE) biplot analysis of multi-environmental wheat variety trials. African J. of Agricultural Research.
  3. Choukan, R. 2010. Genotype, environment and genotype by environment interaction effects on the performance of maize (zea mays l.) inbred lines. Crop Breed. J. 2 : 97-103.
  4. Dehghani, H., S. H. Sabaghpour, and A. Ebadi. 2010. Study of genotype x environment interaction for chickpea yield in Iran. Agron. J. 102 : 1-8. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2009.0156
  5. Eberhart, S. A. and W. A. Russell. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6 : 40-46.
  6. Fehr, W. R. 1987. Principal of cultivar development. Vol. 1 Theory and technique. New York. Macmillan Publishing Company.
  7. Gauch, H. G. and R. W. Zobel. 1997. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci. 37 : 311-326. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700020002x
  8. Kroonenberg, P. M. 1995. Introduction to biplots for GE tables. Res. Rep. 51. Dep. of Mathematics, Univ. of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  9. Pourdad, S. S. and M. J. Moghaddam. 2013. Study on seed yield stability of sunflower inbred lines through GGE biplot. Hella 58 : 19-28.
  10. Yan, W. and L. A. Hunt. 1998. Genotype by environment interaction and crop yield. Plant Breed. Rev. 16 : 135-178.
  11. Yan, W. 2001. GGE biplot : a window application for graphical analysis of multienvironmental data and other types of two-way data. Agron. J., 93 : 1111-1118. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.9351111x
  12. Yan, W. and I. Rajcan. 2002. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in ontario. Crop Sci. 42 : 11-20. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.0011
  13. Yan, W. and M.S. Kang. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for Genetists, Breeders and Agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  14. Yan, W. and N.A. Tinker. 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: principles and application. Candian J. Plant Sci. 86 : 623-645. https://doi.org/10.4141/P05-169
  15. Zobel, R. W., M. J. Wright, and H. G. Gauch. 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agron. J. 80 : 388-393. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000030002x

피인용 문헌

  1. Interpretation of Genotype × Environment Interaction in Agronomic Traits in 24 Potato Cultivars Using AMMI and GGE Biplot Analysis vol.50, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.9787/KJBS.2018.50.2.90
  2. Phenotypic tendency of achene yield and oil contents in sunflower hybrids vol.69, pp.8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2019.1641546