DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Strategy for EMS Service Quality Improvement Using Kano Model and Improvement-Gap Analysis

카노모형과 개선갭분석을 이용한 EMS 서비스품질의 전략적 개선방안

  • 김명섭 (우정사업본부 우정공무원교육원) ;
  • 류문찬 (고려대학교 경상대학 경영학부)
  • Received : 2015.07.14
  • Accepted : 2015.09.11
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: Express mail service(EMS) supplied by 'Korea POST'is an international postal service which brings letters, documents and parcels to a destination abroad in the fastest and safest way. This service is in a tough competition with global companies such as TNT, FedEx, DHL or UPS. To build an effective strategy for being competitive, an intensive study on EMS service quality should be accomplished from a customer's perspective. Methods: Kano model and improvement gap analysis are used to categorize and prioritize EMS service quality attributes. A 5-point Lickert scale is employed to apply the Kano model and improvement gap analysis. Each quality attribute can be classified as weak in comparison with competitors, critical for improvement, or potentially competitive. Results: Price, on-time delivery and delivery quality are to be kept as is; fast delivery, parking convenience and staff expertise can be potentially competitive; and the other attributes are considered to be critical for improvement. Conclusions: Fast reimbursement and proper compensation when shipping items are lost or damaged are to be improved with high priority. Efforts to secure fast delivery, parking convenience and staff expertise are needed to be competitive in the future.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, Ki-Myung, Myung-Jae Kim, and Oh-Sung Kwon. 2011. "A Study on Global Strategy for Korean International Express Companies." Journal of Navigation and Port Research 35(3):271-279. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2011.35.3.271
  2. Berger, C., R. Blauth, D. Boger, C. Bolster, G. Burchill, W. DuMouchel, F. Pouliot, R. Richter, A. Rubinoff, D. Shen, M. Timko, and D. Walden. 1993. "Kano's Methods for Understanding Customer-defined Quality." Center for Quality of Management Journal 2:2-36.
  3. Garver, M. S. 2003. "Best Practices in Identifying Customer-driven Improvement Opportunities." Industrial Marketing Management 32(6):455-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(02)00238-9
  4. Jung, Yon-Bong, and Gi-Tae Yeo. 2013a. "An Empirical Analysis on the Competitiveness of International Air Express Service." Journal of the Aviation Management Society of Korea 11(5):121-139.
  5. Jung, Yon-Bong, and Gi-Tae Yeo. 2013b. "An Analysis on the Competitiveness of Air Express Companies' Group Using the Import Shipment Manifest Data." Journal of Shipping and Logistics 29(4):1055-1078.
  6. Kang, Gi-Du, Seung-Ho Ahn. Hongsik Cheon, and Won-Yeong Lee. 2009. "The Classification of Logistics Service Quality Through the Utilization of Kano Model." Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 37(2):32-45.
  7. Kano, N., N. Seraku, F. Takahashi, and S. Tsjui. 1984. "Attractive Quality and Must-be Quality." Hinshitsu 14:147-56.
  8. Kano. N. 2001. " Life CycJe and Creation of Attractive Quality." Proceedings of the 4th QMOD Conference Linkoping, Sweden, 18-36.
  9. Kim, Man-Ho. HaeGeun Song, and Young T. Park. 2013. "Comparing the Questionnaires for Classifying Quality Attributes in the Kano Model." Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 41(2):209-220. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2013.41.2.209
  10. Kim, Soon Yi, and Jae Ha Choi. 1999. "A Study on Strategy for Improving Health Care Service through Quality Function Deployment." Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 27(2):1-19.
  11. Kwon, Mi-young, and Kwan-ho Yoon. 2012. "A Study on the Service Quality in Post Office." Journal of the Korean Business Education Association 23(3):29-44.
  12. Lee, Chung-Bae, Jong-Chil Kim and Sungwon Kim. 2009. International Logistics. Seoul: Pakyungsa.
  13. Lee, Ha Na. Woo Hyeon Na, and Han Seong Kim. 2011. "The Classification of the Service Quality Elements in the Parcel Service using the Kano Model." Journal of Korea Service Management Society 12(5):315-333. https://doi.org/10.15706/jksms.2011.12.5.012
  14. Lee, Myung-Won, Kwang-Ok Kim, and Yong-Kyu Kang. 2011. "A Study on Service Status and to Revitalize the Competitiveness of Air Express Consignment." Proceedings of the Fall Conference on Aviation management Society of Korea, Seoul, 207-226.
  15. Lee, Wook and Seok-Beom Lee. 2006. "Achieving Competitive Advantage of Korean Express Mail Service." Postal Information 64 Spring, 47-65.
  16. Martilla, J.A., and J.C. James. 1977. "Importance-performance Analysis." Journal of Marketing 41(1):77-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/1250495
  17. Song, HaeGeun and Young T. Park. 2012. "Wordings of the Kano Model's Questionnaire." Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 40(4):453-466. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.4.453
  18. Suh, Chang Juck. 2003. "An Approach to Strategic Improvement of Service Quality in Family Restaurant." Jounal of Korea Service Management Society 4(2):93-113.
  19. Tontini. G., Jaime Dagostim Picolo, and Amelia Silveira. 2014. "Which Incremental Innovations Should We Offer? Comparing importance-performance analysis with improvement-gaps analysis." Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 25(7):705-719. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2014.904571
  20. Witell, L., and Martin Lofgren. 2007. "Classification of Quality Attributes." Managing Service Quality 17(1):54-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520710720674
  21. Yoon, Jae Wook, and Hee Young Lee. 2009. "An Empirical Comparative Analysis Between Kano and Improved Kano Methods." Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 37(4):31-42.

Cited by

  1. An Analysis of Ordinary Mail Service Quality Attributes using Kano Model and Decision Tree Model vol.44, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2016.44.4.883