DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of artificial shrinkage and assisted hatching on the development of mouse blastocysts and cell number after vitrification

  • Kim, Hye Jin (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chungnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Ki Hwan (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chungnam National University Hospital) ;
  • Park, Sung Baek (Fertility Clinic, Mirae Ladies Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Young Bae (Fertility Clinic, Mirae Ladies Hospital) ;
  • Yang, Jung Bo (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chungnam National University Hospital)
  • Received : 2015.03.20
  • Accepted : 2015.08.07
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to ascertain optimal assisted hatching (AH) method in frozen embryo transfer. We compared the effect of depending on whether mechanical or laser-AH was performed before or after the vitrification of embryo development rate and blastocyst cell numbers. Methods: In order to induce superovulation, pregnant mare's serum gonadotropin followed by human chorionic gonadotropin were injected into 4- to 5-week-old female mice. 2-cell embryos were then collected by flushing out the oviducts. The Expanded blastocysts were recovered after the collected embryos were incubated for 48 hours, and were then subjected to artificial shrinkage (AS) and cross-mechanical AH (cMAH) or quarter-laser zona thinning-AH (qLZT-AH) were carried out using the expanded blastocysts before or after vitrification. After 48 hours of incubation, followed by vitrification and thawing (V-T), and blastocysts were fluorescence stained and observed. Results: The rate of formation of hatched blastocysts after 24 and 72 hours of incubation was significantly higher in the AS/qLZT-AH/V-T group than in the other groups (p<0.05). The cell number of the inner cell mass was higher in AS/V-T/non-AH and AS/V-T/cMAH groups than those of others (p<0.05). In the control group, the number of trophectoderm and the total cell number were higher than in the AS-AH group (p<0.05). Conclusion: The above results suggest that AS and AH in vitrification of expanded blastocysts lead to the more efficient formation of hatched blastocysts in mice.

Keywords

References

  1. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J, Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1998;13:3434-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434
  2. Jones GM, Trounson AO, Gardner DK, Kausche A, Lolatgis N, Wood C. Evolution of a culture protocol for successful blastocyst development and pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1998;13:169-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.1.169
  3. Cohen J, Elsner C, Kort H, Malter H, Massey J, Mayer MP, et al. Impairment of the hatching process following IVF in the human and improvement of implantation by assisting hatching using micromanipulation. Hum Reprod 1990;5:7-13.
  4. Bonsi A. Blastocyst transfer and freezing: can this help us to improve the success of assisted reproduction? Singapore J Obstet Gynecol 1995;26:13-7.
  5. Cho HJ, Yoon SH, Yoon HG, Lee WD, Lee SW, Lee SG, et al. Viable high pregnancies obtained from frozen-thawed blastocysts: experience of more than 350 transfer cycles. Korean J Reprod Med 1997:55-6.
  6. Menezo Y, Nicollet B, Herbau N, Andre D. Freezing co-cultured humanblastocysts. Fertil Steril 1992;58: 977-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55445-4
  7. Kaufman RA, Menezo Y, Hazout A, Nicollet B, DuMont M, Servy EJ. Cocultured blastocyst cryopreservation: experience of more than 500 transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 1995;64:1125-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57972-2
  8. Nakayama T, Goto Y, Kanzaki H, Takabatake K, Himeno T, Takakura K, et al. Cryopreservation of human blastocyst. Proceedings of the IX world congress on in vitro Fertilization and Alternated Assisted Reproduction; 1995 April 3-7; Vienna, Austria. p. 451-4.
  9. Zhu SE, Kasai M, Otoge H, Sakurai T, Machida T. Cryopreservation of expanded mouse blastocysts by vitrification in ethylene glycol- based solutions. J Reprod Fertil 1993;98:139-45. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0980139
  10. Scheffen B, Vanderzwalmen P, Massip A. A simple and efficientprocedure for preservation of mouse embryos by vitrification. Cryo Letters 1986;7:260-9.
  11. Miyake T, Kasai M, Zhu SE, Sakurai T, Machida T. Vitrification of mouse oocytes and embryos at various stages of development in an ethylene glycol-based solution by a simple method. Theriogenology 1993;40:121-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90346-7
  12. Carroll J, Depypere H, Matthews CD. Freeze-thaw-induced changes of the zona pellucida explains decreased rates of fertilization in frozen-thawed mouse oocytes. J Reprod Fertil 1990;90: 547-53. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0900547
  13. Germond M, Senn A, Rink K, Delacretas G, De Grandi P. Is assisted hatching of frozen-thawed embryos enhancing pregnancy outcome in patients who had several previous indationfailures? J Reprod Fertil 1995;3:41-2.
  14. Cohen J. Assisted hatching of human embryos. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1991;8:179-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01130802
  15. Tao J, Tamis R. Application of assisted hatching for 2-day-old, frozen-thawed embryo transfer in a poor-prognosis population. J Assist Reprod Genet 1997;14:128-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765783
  16. Vanderzwalmen P, Bertin G, Debauche C, Standaert V, van Roosendaal E, Vandervorst M, et al. Births after vitrification at morula and blastocyst stages: effect of artificial reduction of the blastocoelic cavity before vitrification. Hum Reprod 2002;17:744-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.3.744
  17. Vanderzwalmen P, Bertin G, Debauche C, Standaert V, Bollen N, van Roosendaal E, et al. Vitrification of human blastocysts with the Hemi-Straw carrier: application of assisted hatching after thawing. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1504-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg298
  18. Son WY, Yoon SH, Yoon HJ, Lee SM, Lim JH. Pregnancy outcome following transfer of human blastocysts vitrified on electron microscopy grids after induced collapse of the blastocoele. Hum Reprod 2003;18:137-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg029
  19. Liebermann J, Knopoff E, Matthews J, Erman A, Sanchez S, Tucker M. Blastocyst cryopreservation: to slow-freeze or to vitrify? Fertil Steril 2005;84 Suppl 1:S182.
  20. Strohmer H, Feichtinger W. Successful clinical application of laser for micromanipulation in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 1992;58:212-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55166-8
  21. Jo DH, Ko GR, Jung JH, Choi JR, Joo JK, Lee KS. Effects of the artificial shrinkage and assisted hatching before vitrification on the development of the vitrified mouse expanding blastocysts. Korean J Reprod Med 2008;35:275-83.
  22. Tucker MJ, Cohen J, Massey JB, Mayer MP, Wiker SR, Wright G. Partial dissection of the zona pellucida of frozen-thawed human embryos may enhance blastocyst hatching, implantation, and pregnancy rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:341-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(91)90088-9
  23. Check JH, Hoover L, Nazari A, O'Shaughnessy A, Summers D. The effect of assisted hatching on pregnancy rates after frozen embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1996;65:254-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58080-7
  24. Cieslak J, Ivakhnenko V, Wolf G, Sheleg S, Verlinsky Y. Three-dimensional partial zona dissection for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and assisted hatching. Fertil Steril 1999;71:308-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00452-X
  25. Park SB, Kim HJ, Choi YB, Ahn KH, Lee KH, Yang JB, et al. The effect of various assisted hatching techniques on the mouse early embryo development. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2014;41:68-74. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2014.41.2.68
  26. Khalifa EA, Tucker MJ, Hunt P. Cruciate thinning of the zona pellucida for more successful enhancement of blastocyst hatching in the mouse. Hum Reprod 1992;7:532-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137685
  27. Thouas GA, Korfiatis NA, French AJ, Jones GM, Trounson AO. Simplified technique for differential staining of inner cell mass and trophectoderm cells of mouse and bovine blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online 2001;3:25-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61960-8
  28. Iwasaki S, Yoshiba N, Ushijima H, Watanabe S, Nakahara T. Morphology and proportion of inner cell mass of bovine blastocysts fertilized in vitro and in vivo. J Reprod Fertil 1990;90:279-84. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0900279
  29. Lane M, Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK. Vitrification of mouse and human blastocysts using a novel cryoloop container-less technique. Fertil Steril 1999;72:1073-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00418-5
  30. Richter KS, Harris DC, Daneshmand ST, Shapiro BS. Quantitative grading of a human blastocyst: optimal inner cell mass size and shape. Fertil Steril 2001;76:1157-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02870-9

Cited by

  1. Effect of blastocoel fluid reduction before vitrification on gene expression in mouse blastocysts vol.83, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22681
  2. Effects of vitrification on blastomere viability and cytoskeletal integrity in mouse embryos vol.25, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0967199416000368
  3. Effects of laser-assisted hatching and exposure time to vitrification solution on mouse embryo development vol.44, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2017.44.4.193
  4. The impacts of laser zona thinning on hatching and implantation of vitrified-warmed mouse embryos vol.34, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2681-8
  5. Is it worth it to cryopreserve embryos with blastulation delay at day 5? vol.27, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0967199419000157