Journal of Communications and Networks

The Korean Institute of Commucations and Information Sciences (한국통신학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

User Centric Content Management System for Open IPTV Over SNS

  • Received : 2013.07.31
  • Accepted : 2015.02.13
  • Published : 2015.06.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Coupled schemes between service-oriented architecture (SOA) and Web 2.0 have recently been researched. Web-based content providers and telecommunications company (Telecom) based Internet protocol television (IPTV) providers have struggled against each other to accommodate more three-screen service subscribers. Since the advent of Web 2.0, more abundant reproduced content can be circulated. However, because according to increasing device's resolution and content formats IPTV providers transcode content in advance, network bandwidth, storage and operation costs for content management systems (CMSs) are wasted. In this paper, we present a user centric CMS for open IPTV, which integrates SOA and Web 2.0. Considering content popularity based on a Zipf-like distribution to solve these problems, we analyze the performance between the user centric CMS and the conventional Web syndication system for normalized costs. Based on the user centric CMS, we implement a social Web TV with device-aware function, which can aggregate, transcode, and deploy content over social networking service independently.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Grant : 미래전자통신 인재양성사업단

References

  1. C. Schroth and T. Janner, "Web 2.0 and SOA: Converging concepts enabling the Internet of services," IEEE Computer Soc., pp. 36-41, May 2007.
  2. T. Oreilly, "What Is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software," Commun. & Strategies, no. 65. 1st quarter 2007, pp. 17-37.
  3. D. Krafzig, K. Banke, and D. Slama, Enterprise SOA: Service-Oriented Architecture Best Practices, Pearson Education, NJ, 2005.
  4. Service Delivery Platforms in the Web 2.0 era, The Moriana Group, Sept. 2008.
  5. Z. Liu et al., "Content personalization and adaptation for three-screen services," in Proc. CIVR, July 2008, pp. 635-644.
  6. S. Chandra, C. S. Ellis, and A. Vahdat, "Application-level differentiated multimedia web services using quality aware transcoding," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2544-2565, Dec. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1109/49.898736
  7. R. Martin et al., "neXtream: A multi-device, social approach to video content consumption," in Proc. IEEE CCNC, Jan. 2010, pp. 1-5.
  8. Y. Wu et al., "CloudMoV: Cloud-based mobile social TV," IEEE Trans. Multimedia, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 821-832, June 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2013.2240670
  9. H. Liu, Y.-K.Wang, and H. Li, "A comparison between SVC and transcoding," IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1439-1446, Aug. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCE.2008.4637638
  10. M. Atenas et al., "IPTV transcoding to avoid network congestion," in Proc. ICNS, Mar. 2010, pp. 36-41.
  11. J. Yang, H. Park, and J. K. Choi, "A Web-based content syndication platform for IPTV," in Proc. ICOIN, Jan. 2011, pp. 494-497.
  12. Z. Li et al., "Cloud transcoder: Bridging the format and resolution gap between internet videos and mobile devices," in Proc. NOSSDAV, June 2012.
  13. http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/
  14. http://ffmpeg.mplayerhq.hu/
  15. http://www.tv-anytime.org/workinggroups/wg-md.htm
  16. W. K. S. Tang et al., "Optimal video placement scheme for batching VOD services," IEEE Trans. Broadcast., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 16-25, Mar. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBC.2003.822983
  17. L. Shi et al., "An applicative study of Zipf's law on Web cache," International J. Inf. Technol., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 49-58, 2006.
  18. H.264 Web video encoding tutorial with FFmpeg, https://www.virag.si/2012/01/web-video-encoding-tutorial-with-ffmpeg-0-9/