Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제56권1호
  • /
  • Pages.27-47
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of numerical procedures to determine seismic response of structures under influence of soil-structure interaction

  • Tabatabaiefar, Hamid Reza (School of Engineering and Information Technology, Federation University Australia) ;
  • Fatahi, Behzad (Centre for Built Infrastructure Research, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney (UTS)) ;
  • Ghabraie, Kazem (School of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Southern Queensland) ;
  • Zhou, Wan-Huan (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Macau)
  • 투고 : 2014.04.16
  • 심사 : 2015.09.15
  • 발행 : 2015.10.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this study, the accuracy and reliability of fully nonlinear method against equivalent linear method for dynamic analysis of soil-structure interaction is investigated comparing the predicted results of both numerical procedures with the results of experimental shaking table tests. An enhanced numerical soil-structure model has been developed which treats the behaviour of the soil and the structure with equal rigour. The soil-structural model comprises a 15 storey structural model resting on a soft soil inside a laminar soil container. The structural model was analysed under three different conditions: (i) fixed base model performing conventional time history dynamic analysis, (ii) flexible base model (considering full soil-structure interaction) conducting equivalent linear dynamic analysis, and (iii) flexible base model performing fully nonlinear dynamic analysis. The results of the above mentioned three cases in terms of lateral storey deflections and inter-storey drifts are determined and compared with the experimental results of shaking table tests. Comparing the experimental results with the numerical analysis predictions, it is noted that equivalent linear method of dynamic analysis underestimates the inelastic seismic response of mid-rise moment resisting building frames resting on soft soils in comparison to the fully nonlinear dynamic analysis method. Thus, inelastic design procedure, using equivalent linear method, cannot adequately guarantee the structural safety for mid-rise building frames resting on soft soils. However, results obtained from the fully nonlinear method of analysis fit the experimental results reasonably well. Therefore, this method is recommended to be used by practicing engineers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AS1289.3.5.1 (2006), Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes, Determination of the soil particle density of a soil-standard method, Australian Standards, Sydney.
  2. ATC-40 (1996), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Volume 1, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
  3. Beaty, M.H. and Byrne, P.M. (2001), "Observations on the San Fernando dams", Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, San Diego, California, March.
  4. BSSC (2003), The 2003 NEHRP Recommended Provisions For New Buildings And Other Structures, FEMA 450, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
  5. Byrne, P.M., Naesgaard, E. and Seid-Karbasi, M. (2006), "Analysis and design of earth structures to resist seismic soil liquefaction", 59th Canadian Geotechnical Conference & 7th Joint CGS/IAH-CNC Groundwater Specialty Conference, Vancouver, Canada, October.
  6. Dutta, C.H., Bhattacharya, K. and Roy, R. (2004), "Response of low-rise buildings under seismic ground excitation incorporating soil-structure interaction", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 24(9), 893-914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.07.001
  7. El Ganainy, H. and El Naggar, M.H. (2009), "Seismic performance of three-dimensional frame structures with underground stories", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 29(9), 1249-1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.02.003
  8. Fatahi, B., Tabatabaiefar, H.R. and Samali, B. (2011), "Performance based assessment of dynamic soil-structure interaction effects on seismic response of building frame", Proceedings of Georisk 2011 - Geotechnical Risk Assessment & Management (Geotechnical Special Publication No. 224), American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 344-351.
  9. Fatahi, B., Fatahi, B., Le, T. and Khabbaz, H. (2013), "Small-strain properties of soft clay treated with fibre and cement", Geosyn. Int., 20(4), 286-300. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.13.00018
  10. Fatahi, B. and Tabatabaiefar, H.R. (2014), "Fully nonlinear versus equivalent linear computation method for seismic analysis of Mid-Rise buildings on soft soils", Int. J. Geomech., 14(4), 04014016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000354
  11. Fatahi, B., Tabatabaiefar, H.R. and Samali, B. (2014), "Soil-structure interaction vs site effect for seismic design of tall buildings on soft soil", Geomech. Eng., 6(3), 293-320. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2014.6.3.293
  12. Galal, K. and Naimi, M. (2008), "Effect of conditions on the response of reinforced concrete tall structures to near fault earthquakes", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 17(5), 541-562. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.365
  13. Gazetas, G. and Mylonakis, G. (1998), "Seismic soil-structure interaction: new evidence and emerging issues", Geotechnical Special Publication 75, Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics III, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.
  14. Gemant, A. and Jackson,W. (1937), "The measurement of internal friction in some solid dielectric materials", The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Phil. Mag. J. Sci., 22(1), 960-983.
  15. Hardin, B.O. and Drnevich, V.P. (1972), "Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equations and curves", Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation, 7(8), 667-692.
  16. Hokmabadi, A.S., Fatahi, B. and Samali, B. (2014), "Assessment of soil-pile-structure interaction influencing seismic response of mid-rise buildings sitting on floating pile foundations", Computers and Geotechnics, 55, 172-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.08.011
  17. Hokmabadi, A.S., Fatahi, B. and Samali, B. 2015, "Physical modeling of seismic soil-pile-structure interaction for buildings on soft soils", Int. J. Geomech., 15(2), DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000396
  18. Hokmabadi, A.S., and Fatahi, B. (2016), "Influence of foundation type on seismic performance of buildings considering soil-structure interaction", Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn., 16, 1550043. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455415500431
  19. Jakrapiyanun, W. (2002), "Physical modeling of dynamics soil-foundation-structure-interaction using a laminar container", PhD Thesis, University of California, San Diego.
  20. Karamodin, A.K. and Kazemi, H.H. (2008), "Semi-active control of structures using neuro-predictive algorithm for MR dampers", Struct. Control Hlth. Monit., 17(3), 237-253.
  21. Krawinkler, H., Medina, R. and Alavi, B. (2003), "Seismic drift and ductility demands and their dependence on ground motions", Eng. Struct., 25(5), 637-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00174-8
  22. Langhaar, H. (1951), Dimensional Analysis and Theory of Models, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
  23. Lee, CH., Wei, Y. and Huo, Y. (2012), "Boundary effects of a laminar container in centrifuge shaking table tests", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 34(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.10.011
  24. Lu, J., Elgamal, A., Yan, L., Law, K.H. and Conte, J.P. (2011), "Large-scale numerical modeling in geotechnical earthquake engineering", Int. J. Geomech., 11(6), 490-503. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000042
  25. Maheshwari, B.K. and Sarkar, R. (2011), "Seismic behaviour of soil-pile-structure interaction in liquefiable soils: parametric study", Int. J. Geomech., 11(4), 336-347.
  26. Meymand, P.J. (1998), "Shaking table scale model tests of nonlinear soil-pile-superstructure interaction in soft clay", PhD Thesis in Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
  27. Moss, R.E.S., Crosariol, V. and Kuo, S. (2010), "Shake table testing to quantify seismic soil-structure interaction of underground structures", Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, May, San Diego.
  28. Pitilakis, D., Dietz, M., Wood, D.M., Clouteau, D. and Modaressi, A., (2008), "Numerical simulation of dynamic soil-structure interaction in shaking table testing", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 28, 453-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.07.011
  29. Rayhani, M.H. and El Naggar, M.H. (2008), "Numerical modelling of seismic response of rigid foundation on soft soil", Int. J. Geomech., ASCE, 8(6), 336-346. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2008)8:6(336)
  30. Safak, E. (1995), "Detection and identification of soil-structure interaction in buildings from vibration recordings", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 121(3), 889-906.
  31. Seed, H.B. and Idriss, I.M. (1969), "Influence of soil conditions on ground motion during earthquakes", J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 95(2), 99-137.
  32. Spyrakos, C., Patel, P. and Kokkinos, F. (1989), "Assessment of computational practices in dynamic soil-structure interaction", J. Comput. Civil Eng., ASCE, 3(2), 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1989)3:2(143)
  33. Stewart, J.P., Fenves, G.L. and Seed, R.B. (1999), "Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings: analytical aspects", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., ASCE, 125(1), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:1(26)
  34. Sulaeman, A. (2010), "The use of lightweight concrete piles for deep foundation on soft soils", PhD Thesis in Civil Engineering, University of Tun Hussein Onn, Malaysia.
  35. Sun, J.I., Golesorkhi, R. and Seed, B. (1998), "Dynamic Module and Damping Ratios for Cohesive Soils", Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, Report No. UCB/EERC-88/15, University of California, Berkeley.
  36. Tabatabaiefar, S.H.R. (2012), "Determining seismic response of mid-rise building frames considering SDynamic soil-structure interaction", PhD Thesis, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Australia.
  37. Tabatabaiefar, H.R., Fatahi, B. and Samali, B. (2012), "Finite difference modelling of soil-structure interaction for seismic design of moment resisting building frames", Aus. Geomech. J., 47(3), 113-120.
  38. Tabatabaiefar, S.H.R, Fatahi, B. and Samali, B. (2013a), "Lateral seismic response of building frames considering dynamic soil-structure interaction effects", Struct. Eng. Mech., 45(3), 311-321. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.45.3.311
  39. Tabatabaiefar, S.H.R, Fatahi, B. and Samali, B. (2013b), "Seismic behavior of building frames considering dynamic soil-structure interaction", Int. J. Geomech., 13(4), 409-420. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000231
  40. Tabatabaiefar, H.R., Fatahi, B. and Samali, B. (2014a), "An empirical relationship to determine lateral seismic response of mid-rise building frames under influence of soil-structure interaction", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 23(7), 526-548. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1058
  41. Tabatabaiefar, H.R. and Fatahi, B. and Samali, B. (2014b), "Idealisation of soil-structure system to determine inelastic seismic response of mid-rise building frames", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 66(11), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.08.007
  42. Tabatabaiefar, H.R., Fatahi, B., and Samali, B. (2014c), "Numerical and experimental investigations on seismic response of building frames under influence of soil-structure interaction", Adv. Struct. Eng., 17(1), 109-130. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.1.109
  43. Tang, L., Ling, X., Xu, P., Gao, X. and Wang, D. (2009), "Shake table test of soil-pile groups-bridge structure interaction in liquefiable sround", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 9(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-010-9071-y
  44. Taylor, C.A. (1997), Large Scale Shaking Tests of Geotechnical Structures, Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of Bristol.
  45. Taylor, C.A., Dar, A.R. and Crewe, A. J. (1995), "Shaking table modelling of seismic geotechnical problems", Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineers, Vienna, Austria.
  46. Turan, A., Hinchberger, S. and El Naggar, H. (2009), "Design and commissioning of a laminar soil container for use on small shaking tables", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 29(2), 404-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.04.003
  47. Turan, A., Hinchberger,S. and El Naggar, H. (2013), "Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings on stiff clay with embedded basement stories", Can. Geotech. J., 50(8), 858-873. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2011-0083
  48. Veletsos, A.S. and Meek, J.W. (1974), "Dynamic behaviour of building-foundation system", J. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 3(2), 121-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290030203
  49. Veletsos, A.S. and Prasad, A.M. (1989), "Seismic interaction of structures and soils: stochastic approach", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 115(4), 935-956. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:4(935)
  50. Zhang, C.C., Zhu, H.H., Shi, B. and Mei, G.X. (2014), "Bending of a rectangular plate resting on a fractionalized zener foundation", Struct. Eng. Mech., 52(6), 1069-1084. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.52.6.1069
  51. Zhu, H.H., Yin, J.H., Dong, J.H. and Zhang, L. (2010), "Physical modelling of sliding failure of concrete gravity dam under overloading condition", Geomech. Eng., 2(2), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2010.2.2.089

피인용 문헌

  1. Advanced computation methods for soil-structure interaction analysis of structures resting on soft soils 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1354510
  2. Structural Behaviour and Mechanical Properties of Welded Steel I-Girders with Corrugated Webs pp.2093-6311, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-019-00209-3
  3. Dynamic behaviour of unbraced steel frames resting on soft ground pp.18670520, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/stco.201800003
  4. Seismic response of soil-structure interaction using the support vector regression vol.63, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.63.1.115
  5. Effect of soil in controlling the seismic response of three-dimensional PBPD high-rise concrete structures vol.66, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.66.2.217
  6. Experimental investigation on creep behaviour of composite sandwich panels constructed from polystyrene/cement-mixed cores and thin cement sheet facings vol.20, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2019.1569831
  7. Identification of Far-Field Long-Period Ground Motions Using Phase Derivatives vol.2019, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1065830
  8. Timber Portal Frames vs Timber Truss-Based Systems for Residential Buildings vol.2019, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9047679
  9. Investigation on properties of coarse reclaimed aggregates and their effects on concrete strength and workability vol.20, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900014
  10. Numerical Evaluation of Soil-Structure Interaction Effects on the Seismic Performance and Vulnerability of Reinforced Concrete Buildings vol.20, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001651
  11. Simplified seismic analysis of flexibly supported two-way asymmetric-plan buildings vol.174, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.18.00185