디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제13권9호
  • /
  • Pages.225-233
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

융복합 소셜 앱 제작 플랫폼에서 참여자의 기여도 평가 방법에 관한 연구

A Study on the Contribution Evaluation of Developer in Convergence Social App Manufacturing Platform

  • 구석모 (동국대학교 테크노경영협동과정) ;
  • 박성익 ((주)파인원커뮤니케이션즈) ;
  • 박경동 ((주)다빈치소프트웨어연구소) ;
  • 안병선 (엔트제너스주식회사) ;
  • 김의창 (동국대학교 경영학부)
  • 투고 : 2015.07.28
  • 심사 : 2015.09.20
  • 발행 : 2015.09.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

월드 와이드 요구자를 위한 융복합 소셜 앱 제작 플랫폼은 집단 협업 개발 방식으로 프로젝트 참여자의 의견을 상호 교환하여 소프트웨어의 생산성 향상을 가져올 수 있다. 하지만 융복합 소셜 앱 제작 플랫폼 기반의 집단 협업은 참여자의 평가가 공정하게 이뤄지지 않을 경우 많은 참여자가 이탈하게 된다. 기존 연구에서는 프로젝트 참여자 간의 공정한 동료 평가를 실시하기 위해 다양한 통계적 기법을 바탕으로 동료 평가 점수의 신뢰성을 검증하였다. 기존 동료 평가 기법은 프로젝트 활동율을 고려하지 않았다. 그래서 프로젝트 작업의 성격이 반영되지 않아 프로젝트 참여자의 기여도 평가 점수는 신뢰성이 떨어지거나 왜곡되었다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 참여자의 작업 수행율을 고려한 프로젝트 참여자의 개발 기여도 평가 방법을 제시하였으며 동료 평가 점수의 공정성과 일관성이 보장된 동료 평가 방법을 연구하였다.

The convergence social app manufacturing platform for both demander and developer in worldwide provides a collective collaborative development approach. This platform can bring enhanced productivity with exchange of views among participants. If the assessment is not fair that many participants will leave the collective collaborative project. The previous studies verified the reliability of the evaluation based on statistical techniques. Because the previous studies did not consider the task performance of participants, do not reflect the feature of project tasks. So, the contribution scores of the participants can be distorted. In this study, we suggest the method for evaluating the development contributions value. This is considered the task performance of participants and involved the method of equitable and consistency peer assessment.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. H. J. Hee, Y. H. Lim, "A Measuring Model of Risk Impact on The App Development Project in The Social App Manufacturing Environment," KIPS Transactions on Computer and Communication Systems, Vol.3, No.9 pp. 335-340, 2014.
  2. E. Y. Kim, "A Study on the App Production Belt Model and the Revenue-Sharing Scheme for building Social Network based App Factory," Ph.d. Thesis, Soongsil University, 2012.
  3. M. J. Kim, "Design-Based Research on the Development of Web-Based Formative Peer Assesment System," The Journal of Educational Information and Media, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 85-114, 2008.
  4. K. J. Topping, E. F. Smith, I. Swanson and A. Elliot, "Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between Postgraduate Students," Journal of Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, pp. 149-169, 2008.
  5. M. Kim, "The Effects of the Assessor and Assessee's Roles on Preservice Teachers' Metacognitive Awareness, Performance, and Attitude in a Technology-Related Design Task," Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 2005.
  6. P. Orsmond, S. Merry, K. Reiling, "The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment," Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), pp. 23-38, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930050025006
  7. P. Orsmond, S. Merry, K. Reiling, "The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment," Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(4), pp. 309-323, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000001337
  8. H. Panchal, M. Fathianathan, "Product Realization in The Age of Mass Collaboration," Proc. ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 3-6, 2008.
  9. N. Herbet, "Peer assessment : Is it fair?," Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference). pp. 62-68, 2012.
  10. R. Raban, A. Litchfield, "Supporting peer assessment of individual contributions in groupwork," Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1), pp. 34-47, 2007.
  11. D. Parsons, "Justice in the Classroom : Peer Assessment of Contributions in Group Projects," Proc. 17th, NACCQ, pp. 145-151, 2004.
  12. J. Kennedy, "Peer-assessment in Group Projects : Is It Worth It?," Australian Computer Society, Inc, Vol. 42, 2005.
  13. Z. Marjo, "Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions," Learning and Instruction, Volume 20(4), pp. 270-279, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
  14. C. Nicole, P. Davies, R. Skeers. "Self and peer assessment in software engineering projects," Proceedings of the 7th Australasian conference on Computing education-Volume 42. Australian Computer Society, pp. 91-100, 2005.
  15. M. Y. Cho, S. S. Ko, "Equitable Peer Assessment Method in Collaboration Project Using Statistical Technique," Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering Vol. 36, No. 1, pp.44-52, 2013. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2013.36.1.44