Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

How Consumers Perceive Online Behavioral Advertising: Consumer Typology and Determining Factors

온라인 맞춤형 광고 인식에 따른 소비자유형 연구: 효용과 비용을 중심으로

  • 이진명 (한국소비자교육지원센터) ;
  • 나종연 (서울대학교 소비자학과)
  • Received : 2015.07.10
  • Accepted : 2015.09.20
  • Published : 2015.09.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims 1) to identify distinctive consumer groups according to their perception of benefits and costs of Online Behavioral Advertising(OBA), 2) to explore differences among them, and 3) to investigate antecedent variables that affect the consumers' perception of OBA. Online survey data collected from 1,000 online users. The findings of this study are as follows. First, the result of cluster analysis identified four distinctive consumer groups according to the levels of perceived benefits and costs of OBA: 'Indifferent group', 'cost-centered group', 'benefit-centered group', and 'Benefit-cost balanced group'. Second, four consumer groups showed differences in their demographics, advertising related variables, privacy related variables, and technology related variables. Third, according to multinomial logistic analysis, it was found that there were different factors affecting consumers' perception of benefits and costs of OBA.

본 연구는 온라인 맞춤형 광고의 효용과 비용에 대한 소비자 인식을 살펴보고, 이에 따라 소비자가 어떻게 유형화되며 유형별 특성은 어떠한지 분석하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 20대에서 40대 일반소비자 1,000명을 대상으로 온라인 설문조사를 실시하였다. 본 연구의 결과를 요약하면 첫째, 온라인 맞춤형 광고의 효용과 비용에 대한 인식에 따라 군집분석을 실시한 결과, '효용지각형', '비용지각형', '효용비용지각형', '무관심형'의 4가지 소비자유형이 분류되었다. 둘째, 소비자유형별로 광고 관련 변수, 프라이버시 관련 변수, 기술 관련 변수의 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 셋째, 소비자유형을 종속변수로 다항 로지스틱 회귀분석을 실시한 결과, '효용비용지각형'은 '효용지각형'에 비해 자기정보통제권 인식이 높고 기술에 대한 불편감이 높으며 연령이 높다는 점에서 차별화되며, '비용지각형'에 비해 OBA 경험과 광고 관여도, 사업자 신뢰가 높고, 기술에 대해 낙관적이며, 여성의 비중이 많다는 점에서 차별화되는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Federal Trade Commission. "FTC staff report: Self-regulatory principles for online behavioral advertising", Accessed on February 15, 2009.
  2. Yan, J., Liu, N., Wang, G., Zhang, W., Jiang, Y., & Chen, Z. "How much can Behavioral Targeting Help Online Advertising?" WWW '09 Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web, pp. 261-270, 2009.
  3. J. Y. Rha, J. M. Lee, A. Choi, J. Yoon & J. Choi, "Consumers' Willingness to Provide Personal Information for Online Behavioral Advertising", Telecommunications Review, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 137-152, 2014.
  4. M. H. Shin, "Influence Information Privacy Concerns and Personal Innovation of Smartphone-based Shopping Mall on Usefulness, Ease-of-Use and Satisfaction", Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 12, No. 8. pp. 197-209, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.8.197
  5. H. J. Kim & J. Y. Rha. "Is Smartphone Smart for Everybody? A Study of Smartphone User Typology", Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 37-47. 2015. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.1.37
  6. J. H. Kim, B. K. Sung & S. H. Boo, "The Influence of Usefulness, Convenience & Privacy Threats on Accepting Online Behavioral Advertising: Focused on Consumer's Psychological Response & Perceived Controllability", The Korean Journal of Advertising, Vol. 87, pp. 263-302, 2010.
  7. Yaveroglu, I. & Donthu, N. "Advertising Repetition and Placement Issues in On-line Environments", Journal of Advertising, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 31-44, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367370203
  8. McDonald A. M. & Cranor L. F. "Americans' attitudes about Internet Behavioral Advertising practices". WPES '10 Proceedings of the 9th annual ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society, pp. 63-72, 2010.
  9. Campbell D. E. & Wright R. T. "Shut-up I don't care: Understanding the role of relevance and interactivity on customer attitudes toward repetitive online advertising". Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 62-76, 2008.
  10. Ur B., Leon P. G., Cranor L. F., Shay R. & Wang Y. "Smart, useful, scary, creepy: perceptions of online behavioral advertising", SOUPS '12 Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, 2012.
  11. TRUSTe, "Consumer Research Results: Privacy and online behavioral advertising", 2011.
  12. Tene, O. & Polenetsky, J. "To Track or Do Not Track: Advancing Transparency and Individual Control in Online Behavioral Advertising", Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, Vol. 13, pp. 281-357, 2012.
  13. I. K. Kwon & S. Y. Lee. "Personalized Service Based on Context Awareness through User Emotional Perception in Mobile Environment", Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 287-292, 2012. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.2.287
  14. C. H. Kim, "The Influence of Interactivity and Situational Involvement on Web-based Information as contents into Recall of Web-based Information and Satisfaction on the Information", The Korean Journal of Advertising, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 199-227, 2007.
  15. B. T. Kim & J. M. Kim, "A Study on the Online Advertising Effectiveness of a Product Fit, an Involvement toward the Website and a Click Act", Journal of Marketing Management Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 55-81, 2003.
  16. Leon, P., Ur, B., Shay, R., Wang, Y., Balebako, R., & Cranor, L. "Why Johnny can't opt out: a usability evaluation of tools to limit online behavioral advertising, In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems", ACM, pp. 589-598, 2012.
  17. Awad N. F. & Krishnan M. S. "The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization", MIS quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 13-28, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148715
  18. K. B. Yoon, "Study on Decision-making and Control of Personal Data Posted on the Internet, The Journal of the Institute of Internet", Broadcasting and Communication, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 227-232, 2014. https://doi.org/10.7236/JIIBC.2014.14.4.227
  19. Lam, S. Y., Chiang, J., & Parasuraman, A. "The effects of the dimensions of technology readiness on technology acceptance: An empirical analysis", Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 19-39, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20119
  20. Ducoffe R. H. "Advertising value and advertising on the web", Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 21-35, 1996.
  21. K. H. Nam & J. S. Yeo, "A Study on Consumers' Acceptance Process of Mobile Advertising", Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 1-28, 2011.
  22. McGrath, J. M., & Mahood, C. "The impact of arousing programming and product involvement on advertising effectiveness", Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 41-52, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2004.10505163
  23. C. W. Park, "A Study on the Consumer Factors Influencing the Choice of Channel in the Brokerage Transaction", Journal of Retailing Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 1-26, 2005.
  24. J. Y. Nam & J. Y. Rha, "Location Privacy Concern and its impact on consumers' intention to use Location-Based Services", Consumer policy and education review, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 81-102, 2009.
  25. Parasuraman, A. "Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies", Journal of Service Research, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 307-320, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001
  26. Cranor, L. F. "Necessary but not sufficient: Standardized mechanisms for privacy notice and choice", Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law, Vol. 10, pp. 273-307, 2012.
  27. J. Y. Rha, H. G. Koo, H. J. Kim, J. M. Lee, H. R. Lee & H. Y. Lee, "Consumer Information Search Type for Financial Products", Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 99-124, 2013.