DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Isolation of Lactic Acid Bacteria Showing Antioxidative and Probiotic Activities from Kimchi and Infant Feces

  • Ji, Keunho (Department of Microbiology, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Jang, Na Young (Department of Microbiology, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kim, Young Tae (Department of Microbiology, Pukyong National University)
  • Received : 2015.01.27
  • Accepted : 2015.05.07
  • Published : 2015.09.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate lactic acid bacteria with antioxidative and probiotic activities isolated from Korean healthy infant feces and kimchi. Isolates A1, A2, S1, S2, and S3 were assigned to Lactobacillus sp. and isolates A3, A4, E1, E2, E3, and E4 were assigned to Leuconostoc sp. on the basis of their physiological properties and 16S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis. Most strains were confirmed as safe bioresources through nonhemolytic activities and non-production of harmful enzymes such as β-glucosidase, β-glucuronidase and tryptophanase. The 11 isolates showed different resistance to acid and bile acids. In addition, they exhibited antibacterial activity against foodborne bacteria, especially Bacillus cereus, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli. Furthermore, all strains showed significantly high levels of hydrophobicity. The antioxidant effects of culture filtrates of the 11 strains included 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging capacity, 2.2'-azino-bis (2-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) radical cation scavenging activity, and superoxide dismutase activity. The results revealed that most of the culture filtrates have effective scavenging activity for DPPH and ABTS radicals. All strains appeared to have effective superoxide dismutase activity. In conclusion, the isolated strains A1, A3, S1, and S3 have significant probiotic activities applicable to the development of functional foods and health-related products. These strains might also contribute to preventing and controlling several diseases associated with oxidative stress, when used as probiotics.

Keywords

Introduction

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are widely used in fermented food production and considered as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) organisms that can be safely applied for medical and veterinary functions [22]. LAB constitute a heterogeneous group of industrially important bacteria that are used to produce, using various substrates, fermented foods and beverages such as milk, vegetables, cereals, meat cocoa beans, etc. [12]. Yogurt, cheese, and fermented milk products are mentioned as the main food sources of probiotics [43]. Probiotics are defined as “living microorganisms which, upon ingestion in certain numbers, exert health benefits beyond inherent basic nutrition” [21, 26]. The beneficial effects of probiotics include the prevention and treatment of diarrheal disease, prevention of systemic infections, management of inflammatory bowel disease, immunomodulation, prevention and treatment of allergies, anticancer effects, treatment of cholesterolemia, and alleviation of lactose intolerance [15, 48, 50].

Free radicals and active oxygen have been recognized as an important factor in the pathogenesis of several human diseases [19]. Reactive oxygen metabolites (ROM), generated through normal reactions within the body during respiration in aerobic organisms, can cause damage to proteins, mutations in DNA, oxidation of membrane phospholipids, and modification of low-density lipoproteins. Excessive amounts of ROM lead to cellular damage, which, in turn, promotes chronic diseases, including atherosclerosis, arthritis, diabetes, neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular disease, and cancer [1]. To neutralize the oxidant molecules, the human body synthesizes antioxidant enzymes and molecules that, together with the antioxidants contained in food, form the biological antioxidant barrier. However, in certain circumstances, the defense system fails to protect the body against oxidative stress; consequently, the possibility of increasing antioxidant defenses is considered to be important in the maintenance of human health and disease prevention [46].

The aim of this study was to isolate lactic acid bacteria with high probiotic potentiality in exerting antioxidant activity for counteracting oxidative stress in the host. It can be used as probiotics, which can improve the total antioxidant status and decrease markers of oxidative stress in healthy people. Although the ability of probiotic bacteria to exert antioxidant activity has attracted some attention, so far, no rigorous comparative studies of this feature have been published. Therefore, in this study, we investigated lactic acid bacteria from kimchi and infant feces, showing both probiotic potentiality and antioxidative properties when subjected to exogenous oxidative stress.

 

Materials and Methods

Isolation of Microorganisms

All strains were obtained from kimchi and from feces samples of newborn infants at a postnatal care center of Busan, Korea. Each sample was diluted with sterilized phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) by 10-fold serial dilution. A 0.1 ml aliquot of each dilution was plated onto Man Rogosa Sharpe (MRS) agar (Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) for screening of LAB strains. The plates were aerobically incubated at 30°C for 36 h. Cells were grown under a diurnal light (cool-white light). After incubation, white colonies that formed were selected for single-colony isolation.

Identification of Microorganism

16S rDNA analysis was carried out as described by Moyer et al. [35]. The 16S rDNA was selectively amplified from purified genomic DNA using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with oligonucleotide primers designed to anneal to conserved positions in the 3’ and 5’ regions of bacterial 16S rDNA. The forward primer corresponded to positions 8 to 28 of E. coli 16S rDNA (5’- AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3’) and the reverse primer corresponded to the complement of positions 1492 to 1473 (5’- GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3’). The recombinant DNA was tested by PCR, and the nucleotide sequences were analyzed using the software programs BLASTN and BLASTX of GenBank.

Acid and Bile Salt Tolerance

For the acid tolerance assay, tested bacteria were incubated in MRS broth at 30°C for 18 h, and 1 ml of culture was transferred into 9 ml of PBS adjusted to pH 2.5 with 5 M HCl and then incubated at 30°C. The number of viable bacteria were counted after 0 h and 3 h incubation periods on an MRS agar plate. Triplicates of each sample were created. For the bile salt tolerance assay, tested bacteria were incubated in MRS broth at 30°C for 18 h, and 1 ml of culture was transferred into 9 ml of MRS broth containing 0.3% (w/v) bile salt, and then incubated at 30°C. The number of viable bacteria was counted after 0 h and 24 h incubation periods on a MRS agar plate. Triplicates of each sample were performed [51].

Cell Surface Hydrophobicity

Cell surface hydrophobicity was carried out as described by Dolye and Fosenberg [13]. Tested bacteria cultured at 30°C for 18 h in MRS broth were harvested by centrifugation (5,000 ×g, 10 min, 4°C) and washed twice with quarter-strength Ringer’s solution. These bacteria were resuspended with the same solution. Supernatant and either n-hexadecane or chloroform was added at a ratio of 1:1, respectively. The mixture was vortexed for 2 min. After vortexing, the solution was left at room temperature for 30 min to separate the layer. The suspension of the test bacteria (reading 1) and separated water-soluble layer (reading 2) was measured at 580 nm absorbance for the calculation of hydrophobicity as follows. Adhesion assays were performed in three replicates.

Hemolytic Activity and Enzymatic Activity

Hemolysis was evaluated using sheep blood agar (Asan Pharmaceutical, Korea) plates, and incubated at 30°C for 48 h. Recorded characteristics of hemolysis on blood agar were β- hemolysis (clear zones around colonies), α-hemolysis (a green zone around colonies), and γ-hemolysis (no halo around colonies) [31]. The assay was performed in duplicate. To investigate the enzymatic activity of the test bacteria, tryptophanase, urease, and gelatinase tests were carried out with an API ZYM kit (bioMerieux, France). Each of the strains was incubated on an MRS agar plate, and cells were suspended in 0.85% NaCl solution (McFarland turbidity adjusted to 5-6). A 65 μl quantity of each suspension was inoculated in each API ZYM kit cupule, and after incubating for 4 h at 37°C, zym test reagent was added. Changes of color were observed and the enzyme activity was investigated [28].

Antimicrobial Activity

To investigate the antimicrobial activity, the strains were tested for their potential inhibitory effects against some food-poisoning pathogenic organisms, using the paper disc method (6 mm; Toyo Roshi Kaisha, Japan) with culture supernatant filtrate. The pathogenic bacteria used as indicators were gram-negative and gram-positive reference strains, including Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, and Listeria monocytogenes. Each pathogen was cultured for 24 h. The concentration was adjusted to 106~107 CFU/ml, plated to MRS agar, and dried. Fresh overnight MRS culture strains were harvested by centrifugation at 5,000 ×g for 10 min. Cell-free supernatants and supernatants that had been neutralized with 1 mol/l NaOH (pH 6.8 ± 0.2) were used after being filtersterilized (0.22 μm pore size; Satorious, France). A 60 μl aliquot of each supernatant (pH adjusted to 6.8 ± 0.2, and non-treated supernatant) was absorbed to a 6 mm paper disc and laid on the plate smeared with pathogenic bacteria. This was incubated at 37°C for 8-12 h and checked for the appearance of a clear inhibition zone. Each assay was performed in triplicate.

Antibiotic Susceptibility Assay

Antibiotic susceptibility was investigated by measuring the OD600 values compared with control (MRS broth with antibiotic not added). The antibiotic agents used were ampicillin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, streptomycin, and erythromycin. Overnight-cultured colonies of each strain were suspended into MRS broth to approximately OD600 at 1 density. A volume of 100 μl of the obtained suspension was inoculated into each MRS broth containing antibiotic agents and incubated at 30°C for 24 h. To perform the analysis, tests were conducted in duplicate for each bacteria strains.

Determination of 2,2-Diphenyl-1-Picryl-Hydrazyl (DPPH) Scavenging Activity

The antioxidant activity of strain culture filtrate was measured using the DPPH assay [6] as modified by Sanchez-Moreno et al. [44]. Bacterial culture filtrates were added to 2 ml of DPPH (0.4 mM) solution. When DPPH interacts with an antioxidant that can donate hydrogen, it is reduced, and this decreases the absorbance; readings at 514 nm were recorded using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer. In this study, L-ascorbic acid 0.5% (w/v) (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as a positive antioxidant standard. Electron donating ability (EDA) was expressed as percentage of absorbance gap between the sampleadded and non-added mixture [5]. All determinations were carried out in triplicate.

Determination of 2, 2’-Azino-Bis (3–Ethylbenzthiazoline–6-Sulfonic Acid) (ABTS) Radical

The experiments were conducted using an improved ABTS decolorization assay [42]. This involves the generation of the ABTS+ chromophore by the oxidation of ABTS with potassium persulfate. The ABTS radical cation (ABTS+) was produced by reacting 7 mM stock solution of ABTS with 5.5 mM potassium persulfate and allowing the mixture to stand in the dark for at least 6 h at room temperature before use. Before using the ABTS+ solution, it was diluted with distilled water to an adjusted absorbance of approximately 1 (±0.02) at 734 nm. The absorbance at 734 nm was measured 10 min after mixing the strains that were culture filtrated with 1 ml of ABTS+ solution. The ABTS+ scavenging capacity of the filtrate was compared with that of L-ascorbic acid 0.5% (w/v) used as a negative control. ABTS scavenging ability (%) is expressed by the following formula. All determinations were carried out in triplicate.

Determination of Superoxide Radical (O2-) Scavenging Activity

SOD activity was determined as described by Marklund and Marklund [32]. First, 2.6 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer and 0.2 ml of 7.2 mM pyrogallol were added to 0.2 ml of bacterial culture filtrates and left at room temperature for 10 min. After reacting time had elapsed, 0.1 ml of 1 N HCl was added to the mixture to halt the reaction, and the amount of oxidized pyrogallol at OD420 was measured. The superoxide radical scavenging capacity of the filtrate was expressed as a percentage of the absorbance gap between the sample-added and non-added mixtures.

 

Results

Isolation and Identification of Lactic Acid Bacteria

Thirty strains of lactic acid bacteria were isolated from kimchi and healthy infant feces. After culturing for 48 h, 11 strains were selected as forming wide and white colonies on the MRS agar plate; all strains were gram positive with rod shape. These were cultured on MRS with glycerol broth and stored at –70°C. The isolated strains were named A1, A2, A3, A4, E1, E2, E3, E4, S1, S2, and S3. The A1, A2, S1, S2, and S3 genes were confirmed by sequence analysis and proved to have over 98% homology with the sequence of Lactobacillus sp. Isolates A3, A4, E1, E2, E3, and E4 were found to be over 98% homologous to Leuconostoc sp. by sequence alignment (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.Phylogenetic tree of 11 strains. Maximum likehood tree showing the phylogenetic position of isolated strains based on 16S rDNA gene sequences. Evolutionary distance were computered using the Tamura-Nei model. Bootstrap values (>50%) based on 1,000 replications are shown.

Resistance to Bile Salts and Acid

LAB survival in low pH is very important for tolerating initial stress in the stomach [16]. At the application level, when LAB enters the human body, the first constraint is gastric acid, with a very low pH level of approximately 2-3 [4]. The results indicated that some tested strains tolerated a simulated PBS (pH 2.5) solution (Fig. 2). A1, A3, A4, E2, S1, S2, and S3 showed an over 50% survival rate, and E2 and S3 showed an over 90% survival rate after 3 h incubation with the PBS (pH 2.5) solution. Additionally, the LAB isolates were tested for bile tolerance in MRS broth containing 0.3% ox bile. The obtained results indicated that all strains were resistant to 0.3% ox bile after 24 h incubation. (Fig. 3). Therefore, except for A2, E1, E3, and E4, most strains qualified as a probiotic.

Fig. 2.Survival rate of 11 isolates in PBS. We inoculated 1 ml of each strain culture to 9 ml of PBS (pH 2.5) solution and counted the viable bacteria at 0 h and 3 h after incubation.

Fig. 3.Ox bile tolerance of 11 strains. One milliliter of culture was transferred into 9 ml of MRS broth containing 0.3% (w/v) bile salt, and then incubated at 30°C. The number of viable bacteria was determined at 0 h and 24 h of incubation on an MRS agar plate.

Cell Surface Hydrophobicity

The property of adhesion can provide information about the possibility of probiotics to colonize and may modulate the host immune system. Several mechanisms have been reported about the adhesion of microorganisms to intestinal epithelial cells [45]. Cell hydrophobicity is one of the factors that may contribute to the adhesion of bacterial cells to host tissues [41]. In order to complete the investigation of probiotic criteria, in vitro determination of microbial adhesion to hexadecane and chloroform droplets was performed. This method has been reported to be qualitatively valid to estimate the ability of a strain to adhere to epithelial cells [24]. The results revealed that most strains showed a high value of hydrophobicity over 90%. This indicated that all strains could be good potential probiotics, adhering to gut epithelial cells of human intestine (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.Hydrophobicity percentage of 11 strains. Supernant and either n-hecadecane or chloroform was added at a ratio of 1:1, respectively. The suspension of the test bacteria and separated layers of water-soluble were measured at OD550 nm absorbance.

Hemolysis test and Enzymatic Activity Test

To determine the hemolytic activity of the bacteria, blood hemolysis was evaluated on sheep blood agar. Of note, no strain tested in this work exhibited α- and β-hemolytic activity when cultured in sheep blood agar. In contrast, all strains had γ-hemolytic activity. Microbial enzyme production is also one of the key indicators when selecting probiotics. In this experiment, to observe any enzyme activity, tryptophanase, urease, and gelatinase tests were carried out using an API ZYM kit. The results of tryptophanase, urease, and gelatinase tests were all negative. As shown in Table 1, each strain showed different enzyme activity. Most significantly, A4, E1, E2, E3, E4, and S2 had high activity for β-glucosidase, which can cause colorectal cancer. A1, A2, A3, S1, and S2 showed no harmful enzyme activity; therefore, these strains could be used as probiotics.

Table 1.Note: 0 to 5, activity range; 0, no activity; 5, strong activity.

Inhibition of Growth of Pathogenic Bacteria

The 11 isolated strains were tested for their antibacterial activity, using culture filtrate with non-adjusted pH or neutralized to pH 6.8, against six pathogenic bacteria. The results showed that neutralized culture filtrate had no inhibition activity against six pathogens, but all pH nonadjusted culture filtrates showed clear inhibition against most of the tested indicator bacteria. These results demonstrated that the acid cell-free extract produced by the tested strains cause antimicrobial activity like bacteriocin, such as an organic acid and nitric acid (Table 2). These could also exert beneficial effects in the intestine when used as natural bacteriocin.

Table 2.Note: -, No inhibition; +, inhibition zone between 2 and 6 mm; ++, inhibition zone larger than 6 mm.

Antibiotic Susceptibility

A1, A2, S1, S2, and S3 were resistant only to the β-lactam antibiotic ampicillin and exhibited sensitivity to the aminoglycoside antibiotic streptomycin, the chloramphenicol antibiotic chloramphenicol, the tetracycline antibiotic tetracycline, and the macrolide antibiotic erythromycin. Excepting A1, A2, S1, S2, and S3, all strains showed sensitivity to the five antibiotic agents (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.Antibiotic susceptibility of 11 strains. Each antibiotic corresponding concentration ranges were as follows: ampicillin (50 μg/ml), chloramphenicol (179 μg/ml), tetracycline (50 μg/ml), streptomycin (50 μg/ml), and erythromycin (20 μg/ml).

Each Strain Culture Filtrate Scavenged DPPH and ABTs Radicals

Antioxidant substances donate electrons or hydrogen atoms to the free radical to create a complex. DPPH and ABTS accept electrons or hydrogen atoms from antioxidant substances and convert them into irreversible stable molecules. Antioxidant activity can be measured via electron donating ability. To improve the validity of the results, both kinds of radical scavenging activity assays were used; DPPH and ABTS.

The DPPH radical scavenging activities of culture filtrate of the 11 strains were near and over 50% (Fig. 6), and the ABTS radical scavenging activities of culture filtrates were all greater than 50% (Fig. 7). The results showed the synthetic antioxidant (L-ascorbic acid) was lower in value than the control. However, when compared with the concentration of synthetic antioxidant (0.05% (w/v)) typically used in the experiment, these results were thought to have high antioxidant activity.

Fig. 6.DPPH radical scavenging activities of 11 strains. Bacterial culture filtrates were added to 2 ml of DPPH (0.4 mM) solution. DPPH radical scavenging activity was measured by absorbance at 514 nm. In this study, L-ascorbic acid 0.5% (w/v) (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as a positive antioxidant standard.

Fig. 7.ABTS radical scavenging of 11 strains. Absorbance at 734 nm was measured 10 min after mixing of strain culture filtrate with 1 ml of ABTS+ solution. The ABTS+ scavenging capacity of the filtrate was compared with that of L-ascorbic acid 0.5% (w/v) used as a negative control.

Superoxide Radical Scavenging Activity

In vivo, the important enzymatic antioxidant defense mechanism is superoxide dismutase (SOD). SOD is an enzyme that catalyzes the dismutation of superoxide (O2-) into oxygen and hydrogen peroxide to protect the body from oxygen toxicity [30]. In this research, we measured superoxide radical scavenging generated by pyrogallol auto-oxidation and scavenging superoxide anion radicals were confirmed as shown in Fig. 8. Excepting E1 and E2, all strains exhibited over 35%, and S2 showed the highest SOD scavenging activity (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8.SOD scavenging activities of 11 strains. First, 2.6 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM Tris + 10 mM EDTA, pH 8.5) and 0.2 ml of 7.2 mM pryogallol were added to 0.2 ml of bacterial culture filtrates and left at room temperature for 10 min. After the reacting time, 0.1 ml of 1 N HCl was added to the mixture to halt the reaction and the amount of oxidized pyrogallol was measured at OD420.

 

Discussion

Modern society has a very keen interest in personal health, and as a result, functional foods such as probiotics are being developed. Probiotics are defined as “living micro-organisms which, upon ingestion in certain numbers, exert health benefits beyond inherent basic nutrition” [18]. Until now, lactic acid bacteria have been recognized for improve intestinal health, but recently the market for products containing this bacterial strain has changed. The Lactobacillus market is entering into a new phase, adding new function to conventional intestinal regulation.

Oxidative stress occurs when the supply of the body’s antioxidant is insufficient to handle or neutralize free radicals [20]. Free radicals are highly unstable molecules that interact with other molecules in our bodies to destroy cellular membranes, enzymes, and DNA. They accelerate aging and contribute to the development of many diseases, including cancer and heart disease [2]. Antioxidants are chemical compounds that can prevent, stop, or reduce oxidative damage, protecting the human body from free radicals and retarding the progress of many diseases. Therefore, the development and utilization of effective antioxidants are desired [25, 27, 34]. Lactic acid bacteria are widely found in Korean traditional fermented food such as kimchi, as well as in the human intestine. Specifically, during breastfeeding, 90% of the intestinal flora of newborn colostrum is composed of lactic acid bacteria. In this study, selection of specific strains can exert a role in the prevention of oxidative stress and related disease. Thus, we isolated potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria from kimchi and infant feces.

In this study, 11 strains of lactic acid bacteria were isolated from the traditional fermented food kimchi and from feces from healthy breast-feeding infants. The A1, A2, S1, and S2 isolates were assigned to Lactobacillus paracasei; A3, A4, E1, E2, E3, and E4 isolates were assigned to Leucononstoc mesenteroides; and S3 was assigned to Lactobacillus casei on the basis of their physiological properties and 16S rDNA sequence analysis. For a strain to be qualified as a probiotics, it must have fulfilled certain physiological characteristics, including survival in the gastrointestinal tract, tolerance to low pH, and tolerance to bile in the form of glycocholic or taurocholic acid and sodium deoxycholate [29, 52], adherence to epithelial cells, demonstration of safety, antagonistic activity against pathogens, and antibiotic properties [23, 49]. It has been reported previously that acidity has the most negative effect on bacterial growth and viability during passage through the stomach [9]. The pH in the human stomach ranges from 1.5 to 4.5 depending on the intervals of feeding, the types of food consumed, and the duration of food digestion, which can take up to 3 h. As the results in Fig. 2 illustrate, A1, A3, A4, E2, S1, S2, and S3 showed high acid tolerance. These important observed results are in agreement with those reported by Burns et al. [8, 14, 40]. Studies have previously reported that bile tolerance is also considered an important factor that affects LAB viability [3, 37]. Bile is a result of a digestive secretion that can play a major role in lipid emulsification [8]. The relevant physiological concentrations of human bile salts range from 0.3% to 0.5% [14, 54]. Because of their similarity, the value of 0.3% ox bile (Oxgall) solution is the most used substitute for human bile salts [7, 10, 17, 36]. All 11 strains have tolerance to up to 0.3% ox bile acid. Therefore, these LAB isolates were able to grow and survive at bile salt conditions for up to the tested period of 6 h.

The calculated hydrophobicity value of the 11 strains was consistently around 95%, as shown in Fig. 4. Compared with the characteristic reported by Perez et al. [39] of requiring at least 85% hydrophobicity support in order to adhere to the epithelial cell, all isolated strains demonstrated that they possess the capability to adhere to epithelial cells. The capacity for intestinal epithelial cells has to be further verified through in vivo experiment, such as Caco 2 cell and mouse empirical studies. The food industry needs to carefully assess the safety and efficacy of all new species before their incorporation into food products [38]. In the present research, A1, A3, S1, and S3 were confirmed as safe bioresources because of their non-hemolytic activities and non-production of harmful β-glucosidase, β-glucuronidase, tryptophanase, and urease. In addition, inhibition of foodborne pathogenic bacteria growth is one of the desirable properties of probiotic bacteria. Pathogens can be antagonized through the production of antimicrobial compounds such as nisin bacteriocin [11], which competes for pathogen binding and receptor sites as well as for available nutrients and growth factors [30, 38, 47]. Under our experiment conditions, 11 strains showed a clear zone for Salmonella typhimurium, Escherichia coli, Bacillus cereus, and Listeria monocytogenes, and presented different antipathogen activities. Through these results, we can expect human healthcare to benefit, improving protection against occurrences of diarrhea, food poisoning, and enteric infection and improvement of our intestinal flora.

As shown in Fig. 5, only A1, A2, S1, S2, and S3 showed resistance to ampicillin. The other strains were susceptible to ampicillin, streptomycin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and erythromycin. Intrinsic resistance is not horizontally transferable, and poses no risk in non-pathogenic bacteria [33].

Accumulated evidence suggests that A1, A3, S1, and S3 have good potential for application in functional foods and health-related products. To augment these results, the present study researched the antioxidant properties of these strains. To elucidate the antioxidant activity of the 11 strains, DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activities and superoxide radical scavenging were determined as described previously. Fig. 6 shows the DPPH radical scavenging activity of the 11 strains. The scavenging activity of the 11 strain culture filtrates was around 50% and the ABTs radical scavenging activity was all greater than 50% (Fig. 7). The results were lower than that of the control (L-ascorbic), but when compared with the concentration of synthetic antioxidant (0.05% (w/v)) typically used in these experiment, these results are believed to have high antioxidant activity. Additionally, the culture supernatant had 50% antioxidant activity as non-purified solution, demonstrating potential as a natural antioxidant. Increase of the antioxidant capacity by optimizing the environmental factors makes it possible to obtain useful industrial materials. Excepting E1 and E2, all strains exhibited over 35%, and S2 showed the highest, SOD scavenging activity. Yang et al. [53] reported that there is a significant positive correlation among the SOD-like activities and the metabolite of LAB contributing to inhibition or activation of the antioxidant activity of SOD. In this study, SOD activity was measured using the culture filtrate. It is considered that purification of the filtrate could exhibit a higher activity.

This study provides support for the formulation of novel probiotic foods or supplements that can play a role in the prevention of oxidative stress and related diseases. The screening of physiological traits to assess the potential of probiotic bacteria for specific functions can be subsequently verified in animal models.

References

  1. Babbs CF. 1990. Free radicals and the etiology of colon cancer. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 8: 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(90)90091-V
  2. Battino M, Bullon P, Wilson M, Newman H. 1999. Oxidative injury and challenge of antioxidants to free radicals and reactive oxygen species. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 10: 458-476. https://doi.org/10.1177/10454411990100040301
  3. Begly M, Gahan CG, Hill C. 2005. The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 29: 625-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsre.2004.09.003
  4. Bilkova A, Kinova Sepova H, Bilka F, Bukovsky M, Balazova A, Bezakova L. 2008. Identification of newly isolated lactobacilli from stomach mucus of lamb. Acta Fac. Pharm. Univ. Comen. 55: 64-72.
  5. Blois MS. 1958. Antioxidant determination by the use of a stable free radical. Nature 24: 1199-1204. https://doi.org/10.1038/1811199a0
  6. Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C. 1995. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 28: 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5
  7. Brashears MM, Galyean ML, Loneragan GH, Killinger-Mann K. 2003. Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157, H7 and performance by beef feedlot cattle given Lactobacillus direct-fed microbials. J. Food Prot. 66: 748-754. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-66.5.748
  8. Burns P, Patrignani F, Serrazanetti D, Vinderola GC, Reinheimer JA, Lanciotti R, Guerzoni ME. 2008. Probiotic Crescenza cheese containing Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacilus acidophilus manufactured with high-pressure homogenized milk. J. Dairy Sci. 91: 500-512. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0516
  9. Charteris WP, Kelly PM, Morelli L, Collins JK. 1998. Development and application of an in vivo methodology to determine the transit tolerance of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in the upper human gastrointestinal tract. J. Appl. Microbiol. 84: 759-768. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00407.x
  10. Chou L, Weimer B. 1999. Isolation and characterization of acid and bile-tolerant isolates from strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus. J. Dairy Sci. 82: 23-31. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75204-5
  11. del Miraglia GM, De Luca MG. 2004. The role of probiotics in the clinical management of food allergy and atopic dermatitis. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 38: S84-S85. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mcg.0000133293.18576.d2
  12. Dolye MP, Beuchat LR. 2007. Food Microbiology: Fundamentals and Frontiers, 3rd Ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  13. Dolye RJ, Fosenberg M. 1995. Measurement of microbial adhesion to hydrophobic substrates. Methods Enzymol. 253: 542-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(95)53046-0
  14. Duune C, O’Mahony L, Murphy L, Thornton G, Morrissey D, O’Halloran S. 2001. In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: correlation with in vivo findings. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73: 386S-389S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/73.2.386s
  15. Gill HS, Guarner F. 2004. Probiotics and human health: a clinical perspective. Postgrad. Med. J. 80: 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2003.008664
  16. Gilliland SE, Walker DK. 1989. Probiotics and their fermented food products are beneficial for health. J. Dairy Sci. 73: 905-911. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78747-4
  17. Gilliland SE, Walker K. 1990. Factors to consider when selecting a culture of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a dietary adjunct to produce a hypocholesterolemic effect in human. J. Dairy Sci. 73: 905-911. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78747-4
  18. Guarner F, Schaafsma GJ. 1998. Probiotics. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 39: 237-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(97)00136-0
  19. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM, Cross CE. 1992. Free radicals, antioxidant and human disease: where are we now?. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 119: 598-620.
  20. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. 1989. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine, pp. 23-30. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
  21. Hawley HB, Sheperd PA, Wheather DM. 1959. Factors affection the implantation of lactobacilli in the intestine. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 22: 360-367.
  22. Holzapfel WH, Schillinger U. 2002. Introduction to pre- and probiotics. Food Res. Int. 35: 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(01)00171-5
  23. Kaur IP, Chopra K, Saini A. 2002. Probiotics, potential pharmaceutical applications. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 15: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-0987(01)00209-3
  24. Kiely LJ, Olson NF. 2000. The physicochemical surface characteristics of Lactobacillus casei. Food Microbiol. 17: 277-291. https://doi.org/10.1006/fmic.1999.0311
  25. Kinsella JE, Frankel E, German B, Kanner JI. 1993. Possible mechanism for the protective role of the antioxidant in wine and plant foods. Food Technol. 47: 85-89.
  26. Klein G, Pack A, Bonaparte C, Reuter G. 1998. Taxonomy and physiology of probiotic lactic acid bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 41: 103-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00049-X
  27. Lai IS, Chou ST, Cha WW. 2001. Studies on the antioxidative activities of Hsian-tsao (Mesona procumbens Hemsl) leaf gum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49: 963-968. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf001146k
  28. Lim SJ, Jang SS, Kang DK. 2007. Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus CPM-7 isolated from chicken feces. Kor. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 35: 98-103.
  29. Madigan M, Martinko J, Parker J. 2006. Control del crecimiento microbiano, pp. 725-727. In Brock, Biología de los microorganismos. 10th Ed. Prentice Hall Iberia, Madrid.
  30. Makras L, De Vuyst L. 2006. The in vitro inhibition of gramnegative pathogenic bacteria by Bifidobacteria is caused by the production of organic acids. Int. Dairy J. 16: 1049-1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.09.006
  31. Maragkoudakis PA, Konstantions CM, Psyrras D, Cremonese S, Fischer J, Cantor MD, Rsakalidou E. 2009. Functional properties of novel protective lactic acid bacteria and application in raw chicken meat against Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enteritidis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 130: 219-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.01.027
  32. Marklund S, Marklund G. 1974. Involvement of the superoxide anion radical in the autoxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for superoxide dismutase. Eur. J. Biochem. 47: 469-474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03714.x
  33. Mathur S, Singh R. 2005. Antibiotic resistance in food lactic acid bacteria - a review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 105: 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.03.008
  34. Moure A, Cruz JM, Franco D, Dominguez JM, Sineiro J, Dominguez H, et al. 2001. Natural antioxidants from residual sources. Food Chem. 72: 145-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00223-5
  35. Moyer CL, Dobbs FC, Karl DM. 1994. Estimation of diversity and community structure through restriction fragment length polymorphism distribution analysis of bacterial 16S rRNA genes from a microbial mat at an active, hydrothermal vent system, Loihi Seamount, Hawaii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60: 871-879.
  36. Noh DO, Gilliland SE. 1993. Influence of bile on cellular integrity and beta-galactosidase activity of L. acidophilus. J. Dairy Sci. 76: 1253-1259. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77454-8
  37. Pacheco KC, del Toro GV, Martinez FR, Duran-Paramo E. 2010. Viability of Lactobacillus delbruecki under human gastrointestinal conditions simulated in vitro. Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 5: 37-42. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2010.37.42
  38. Parvez S, Malik KM, Kang A, Kim HY. 2006. Probiotics and their fermented food products are beneficial for health. J. Appl. Microbiol. 100: 1171-1185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02963.x
  39. Perez C, Pauli M, Bazerque P. 1990. An antibiotics assay by agar well diffusion method. Acta Biol. Med. Exp. 15: 113-115.
  40. Petros A, Maragkoudakis PA, Zoumpopoulou G, Miaris C, Kalantzopoulos G, Pot B, Tsakalidou E. 2006. Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from dairy products. Int. Dairy J. 16: 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.02.009
  41. Ram C, Chander H. 2004. Optimization of culture conditions of probiotic Bifidobacteria for maximal adhesion to hexadecane. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 19: 407-410. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023946702949
  42. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. 1999. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 26: 1231-1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3
  43. Salminen S. 1996. Uniqueness of probiotic strains. IDE Nutr. News Lett. 5: 16-18.
  44. Sánchez-Moreno C, Larrauri JA, Saura-Calixto F. 1998. A procedure to measure the antiradical efficiency of polyphenols. J. Sci. Food Agric. 76: 270-276. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199802)76:2<270::AID-JSFA945>3.0.CO;2-9
  45. Savage DC. 1992. Growth phase, cellular hydrophobicity and adhesion in vitro of lactobacilli colonizing the keratinizing gastric epithelium in the mouse. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58: 1992-1995.
  46. Serafini M, Del Rio D. 2004. Understanding the association between dietary antioxidants, redox status and disease: is the total antioxidant capacity the right tool? Redox Rep. 9: 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1179/135100004225004814
  47. Servin AL. 2004. Antagonistic activities of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria against microbial pathogens. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 28: 405-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsre.2004.01.003
  48. Spahaak S, Havenaar R, Schaafsma G. 1998. The effect of consumption of milk fermented by Lb. casei strain Shirota on the intestinal microflora and immune parameters in humans. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 52: 899-907. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600663
  49. Stadler M, Viernstein H. 2003. Optimization of a formulation containing viable lactic acid bacteria. Int. J. Pharm. 256: 117-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(03)00068-1
  50. Stiles ME, Holzapfel WH. 1997. Lactic acid bacteria of foods and their current taxonomy. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 36: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(96)01233-0
  51. Thirabunyanon M, Boonprasom P, Niamsup P. 2009. Probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fermented diary milks on antiproliferation of colon cancer cells. Biotechnol. Lett. 31: 571-576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-008-9902-3
  52. Tomasik PJ, Tomasik P. 2003. Probiotics and prebiotics. Cereal Chem. 80: 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM.2003.80.2.113
  53. Yang HS, Choi YJ, Oh HH, Moon JS, Jung HK, Kim KJ, et al. 2014. Antioxidative activity of mushroom water extracts fermented by lactic acid bacteria. J. Kor. Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 43: 80-85. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2014.43.1.080
  54. Zavaglia AG, Kociubinsky G, Pérez P, de Antoni G. 1998. Isolation and characterization of Bifidobacterium strains for probiotic formulation. J. Food Prot. 61: 865-873. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-61.7.865

Cited by

  1. Lactobacillus curvatus WiKim38 isolated from kimchi induces IL-10 production in dendritic cells and alleviates DSS-induced colitis in mice vol.54, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-016-6160-2
  2. Purification and Identification of Antioxidant Peptides from Enzymatic Hydrolysate of Spirulina platensis vol.26, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1601.01033
  3. Antioxidant activity of Lactobacillus plantarum JM113 in vitro and its protective effect on broiler chickens challenged with deoxynivalenol1 vol.95, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016.0789
  4. 김치에서 분리된 콜레스테롤 감소능을 가진 젖산세균의 특성 vol.49, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9721/kjfst.2017.49.4.377
  5. Identification of 2-hydroxyisocaproic acid production in lactic acid bacteria and evaluation of microbial dynamics during kimchi ripening vol.7, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10948-0
  6. Anti-inflammatory and Antioxidant Properties of Probiotic Bacterium Lactobacillus mucosae AN1 and Lactobacillus fermentum SNR1 in Wistar Albino Rats vol.9, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03063
  7. Effect of riboflavin‐producing bacteria against chemically induced colitis in mice vol.124, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13622
  8. Screening Potential Probiotic Characteristics of Lactobacillus brevis Strains In Vitro and Intervention Effect on Type I Diabetes In Vivo vol.2018, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7356173
  9. 김치 및 김치 유래 유산균의 건강 기능성에 대한 연구 동향 조사 vol.51, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2018.51.1.1
  10. Antioxidant Activity and Inhibitory Effects on Oxidative DNA Damage of Callus from Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai vol.31, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2018.31.3.228
  11. Antioxidant effects of live and heat-killed probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum Ln1 isolated from kimchi vol.55, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3245-4
  12. Isolation and Characterization of New Probiotic Strains From Chinese Babies vol.52, pp.suppl1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/mcg.0000000000001113
  13. In vitro Organic Acid Production and In Vivo Food Pathogen Suppression by Probiotic S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus vol.10, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00782
  14. Antioxidant and immune-enhancing effects of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum 200655 isolated from kimchi vol.28, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-018-0473-3
  15. Inhibition of Nitric Oxide Production, Oxidative Stress Prevention, and Probiotic Activity of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from the Human Vagina and Fermented Food vol.7, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7040109
  16. Effects of Feeding Different Postbiotics Produced by Lactobacillus plantarum on Growth Performance, Carcass Yield, Intestinal Morphology, Gut Microbiota Composition, Immune Status, and Growth Gene Exp vol.9, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090644
  17. Characterization of Probiotic Properties of Antifungal Lactobacillus Strains Isolated from Traditional Fermenting Green Olives vol.12, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-019-09543-8
  18. Dietary Supplementation of Postbiotics Mitigates Adverse Impacts of Heat Stress on Antioxidant Enzyme Activity, Total Antioxidant, Lipid Peroxidation, Physiological Stress Indicators, Lipid Profile an vol.10, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10060982
  19. Protective and inhibitory effects of acteoside from Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai against oxidative DNA damage vol.22, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11258
  20. Low-Carbohydrate Tolerant LAB Strains Identified from Rumen Fluid: Investigation of Probiotic Activity and Legume Silage Fermentation vol.8, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8071044
  21. Isolation of Bile Salt Hydrolase and Uricase Producing Lactobacillus brevis SF121 from Pak Sian Dong (Fermented Spider Plant) for using as Probiotics vol.14, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.22207/jpam.14.3.10
  22. Paraprobiotics and postbiotics: Contemporary and promising natural antibiotics alternatives and their applications in the poultry field vol.10, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4314/ovj.v10i3.11
  23. Sustainable microbial cell nanofactory for zinc oxide nanoparticles production by zinc-tolerant probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum strain TA4 vol.19, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-1279-6
  24. Partial characterization of probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from Chinese dairy products vol.24, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2021.1900233
  25. Comparative Studies of Inhibitory and Antioxidant Activities, and Organic Acids Compositions of Postbiotics Produced by Probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Strains Isolated From Malaysian Foods vol.7, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.602280
  26. Effects of Phytic Acid-Degrading Bacteria on Mineral Element Content in Mice vol.12, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.753195
  27. Characterization of Bacillus spp. isolated from intestine of Labeo rohita—Towards identifying novel probiotics for aquaculture vol.52, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/are.14937
  28. Supplementation of postbiotic RI11 improves antioxidant enzyme activity, upregulated gut barrier genes, and reduced cytokine, acute phase protein, and heat shock protein 70 gene expression levels in h vol.100, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.011
  29. Isolation of Lactobacillus species from fermented Parkia biglobosa seed and screening for their probiotic activity vol.13, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.15547/ast.2021.02.034
  30. Gastrointestinal transit tolerance, cell surface hydrophobicity, and functional attributes of Lactobacillus Acidophilus strains isolated from Indigenous Dahi vol.9, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2468