References
- Doo AR, Kim JW, Lee JH, Han YJ, Son JS. A comparison of two techniques for ultrasound-guided caudal injection: the influence of the depth of the inserted needle on caudal block. Korean J Pain 2015; 28: 122-8. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2015.28.2.122
- Jo DH, Kim MH, Choy YK. The depth and angle during caudal epidural approach in adult. J Korean Pain Soc 2001; 14: 207-10.
- Aggarwal A, Kaur H, Batra YK, Aggarwal AK, Rajeev S, Sahni D. Anatomic consideration of caudal epidural space: a cadaver study. Clin Anat 2009; 22: 730-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20832
- Manchikanti L, Cash KA, Pampati V, McManus CD, Damron KS. Evaluation of fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injections. Pain Physician 2004; 7: 81-92.
Cited by
- Advantages of caudal block over intrarectal local anesthesia plus periprostatic nerve block for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy vol.32, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.324.9823
- LY Hotel Personalized Service Strategy Analysis vol.8, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12677/mm.2018.84051