DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Research into the Characteristics of Fashion/Textile Design Practice-Led PhD Theses in the UK

영국의 패션, 텍스타일 디자인 실기 주도(Practice-led) 박사 논문에 관한 특성 연구

  • 김혜은 (Royal College of Art 패션 여성복)
  • Received : 2015.06.17
  • Accepted : 2015.08.24
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

Practice is essential in art and design. Through practice, artists gain tacit knowledge that is hard to acquire from conventional academic studies. This paper characterizes practice-led research in the study of fashion and textile design through the investigation of practice-led research theses in the UK. According to relevant literature, which includes four exemplary case studies, the following features can be drawn: First, the methodology is different in each case and the use of practice is unconventional. Second, the research is not always aimed at making products. Third, the structure follows an iterative process. Fourth, the ratios of theory and practice are different and various theories are used. Fifth, a personal journal or diary is used for reflection as a major aid to research. Lastly, the process should be recorded by a thorough academic method. Practice-led research can have unexpected outcomes in theory and practice. It can be a good option for fashion practice research to develop a better evaluation method and reduce the gap between subjectivity and objectivity.

Keywords

References

  1. Archer, B. (1995). The Nature of Research. Co-design. interdisciplinary journal of design, January 1995, 6-13.
  2. Arnold, J. (2012). Practice Led Research: Creative Activity, Academic Debate, and Intellectual Rigour. Higher Education Studies, 2(2), 9-24.
  3. Bersha, J. (2013). Synthetic and Natural Polymers Recycled to Make Matter with New Functionality and Aesthetics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Royal College of Art, London, UK.
  4. Burgess, R. (1991). In the Field-An Introduction to Field Research. London, UK: Routledge.
  5. Choo, T. (1997). A study of fashion and textile design education in the UK. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 33, 55-71.
  6. Coumans, A. (2003). Practice-led research in higher arts education. On the move: Sharing experience on the Bologna Process in the arts. Amsterdam, Netherlands: European League of Institutes of the Arts(ELIA).
  7. Dilnot, C. (1998). The Science of Uncertainty-The potential contribution of design to knowledge. Doctoral education in design conference, 1-41.
  8. Doosan Dong-A. (Ed.) (2002). Doosan world encyclopedia Vol. 24. Seoul, Republic of Korea: Doopedia.
  9. Ethnography. (n.d.). In Oxford Dictionaries online. Retrieved from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/ethnography
  10. Frayling, C. (1993). Practice-Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1).
  11. Frayling et al. (1997). Practice-based doctorates in the creative and performing arts and design. Warwick, UK: UK Council for Graduate Education.
  12. Gray, C. (1996). Inquiry through practice: developing appropriate research strategies, No Guru, no method?. Helsinki, Finland: UIAH.
  13. Harper, G. (2008). Creative writing: Words as practiceled research. Journal of Visual Arts Practice, 7(2), 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1386/jvap.7.2.161_1
  14. Horseley, J. (2012). Embedding the personal: the construction of a 'fashion autobiography' as a museum exhibition, informed by innovative practice at ModeMuseum, Antwerp (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). London College of Fashion, London, UK.
  15. Husinami, C. (2005). The Dictionary of Knowledge science [지식과학사전]. Seoul, Republic of Korea: Bada Publication.
  16. Jeung, E. & Kim, M. (2010). A Plan for Managing a Design Practice Class Associated with Social Enterprises and Case Study of the Relevant Project. The Treatise on The Plastic Media, 13(4), 251-260.
  17. Kim. H. (2015). Designing fashion with Qi energy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Royal College of Art, London, UK.
  18. Kim, L. & Park, M. (2005). A study on the distance learning education for fashion illustration. Journal of the Korean Society of Costume, 55(3), 150-163.
  19. Nimkulrat, N. (2007). The Role of Documentation in Practice-Led Research. Journal of Research Practice, 3(1), 2.
  20. Norris-Reeves, S. (2014a). Constructing a narrative of fashion practice as inquiry-volume 1 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Royal College of Art, London, UK.
  21. Norris-Reeves, S. (2014b). Constructing a narrative of fashion practice as inquiry-volume 2 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Royal College of Art, London, UK.
  22. Park, Y. (2014). The effects of applying PBL in design practice class. Bulletin of Korean society of basic design & art, 15(4), 145-153.
  23. Philpott, R. (2011). Structural textiles: Adaptable form and surface in three dimensions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Royal College of Art, London, UK.
  24. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York, USA: Doubleday & Company, Inc.
  25. Royal College of Art (2015). Research Student Handbook 2014/2015. London, UK: Royal College of Art.
  26. Rust, C., Mottram, J. & Till, J. (2007). AHRC research review practice-led research in art, design and architecture. London, UK: Arts & Humanities Research Council.
  27. Sakabe, M., Arihuku, K., Kurosaki, M., Nakasima, Y. & Makino, A. (2009). The Dictionary of Kant[칸트사전]. (S. Lee, Trans.). Seoul, Republic of Korea: b.
  28. Schon, D. (1984). The reflective practitioner. New York, USA: Basic Books.
  29. Stankard, S. (2010a). Textile praxis: The case for Malaysian hand-woven Songket-Volume 1 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Royal College of Art, London, UK.
  30. Stankard, S. (2010b). Textile praxis: The case for Malaysian hand-woven Songket-Volume 2 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Royal College of Art, London, UK.
  31. Sullivan, G. (2009). Making Space: The Purpose and Place of Practice-Led Research. In Smith, H. & Dean, R.(Eds.), Practice-led Research, Research-led Practice in the Creative Arts. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press. 41-65.

Cited by

  1. Self-observation of the design process vol.24, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7741/rjcc.2016.24.6.743