Journal of the Korean Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

Korean Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (한국산업응용수학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

LINEAR QUADRATIC OPTIMAL GUIDANCE WITH ARBITRARY WEIGHTING FUNCTIONS

  • LEE, CHANG-HUN (DEPARTMENT OF GUIDANCE AND CONTROL, AGENCY FOR DEFENSE DEVELOPMENT)
  • Received : 2015.08.06
  • Accepted : 2015.08.19
  • Published : 2015.09.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this article, the linear quadratic (LQ) optimal guidance laws with arbitrary weighting functions are introduced. The optimal guidance problems in conjunction with the control effort weighed by arbitrary functions are formulated, and then the general solutions of these problems are determined. Based on these investigations, we can know a lot of previous optimal guidance laws belong to the proposed results. Additionally, the proposed results are compared with other results from the generalization standpoint. The potential importance on the proposed results is that a lot of useful new guidance laws providing their outstanding performance compared with existing works can be designed by choosing weighting functions properly. Accordingly, a new optimal guidance law is derived based on the proposed results as an illustrative example.

Keywords

References

  1. A. E. Bryson Jr. and Y.-C. Ho, Applied Optimal Control, New York: Wiley (1975)
  2. F. L. Lewis, W. L. Syrmos, Optimal Control, John Wiley and Sons, Inc (1995)
  3. J. Z. Ben-Asher and I. Yaesh, Advances in Missile Guidance Theory, 180, Reston: AIAA (1988).
  4. C. P. Mracek and D. B. Ridgely, Missile Longitudinal Autopilots: Connections between Optimal control and Classical Topologies, AIAA Guid. Nav. Contr. Conf. Exh., San Francisco, California (2015)
  5. A. Budiyono and S. S. Wibowo, Optimal Tracking Controller Design for a Small Scale Helicopter, J. Bionic. Eng., 4(2) (2007), 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(07)60041-9
  6. R. E. Kalman, A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems, T. ASME-J. Basic Eng., (1960), 35-40.
  7. C. L. Lin and Y. Y. Chen, Design of Advanced Guidance Law against High Speed Attacking Target, Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. ROC(A), 23(1) (1999), 60-74.
  8. M. Idan, O. Golan, and M. Guelman, Optimal Planar Interception with Terminal Constraints, J. Guid. Control Dynam., 18(6) (1995), 1273-1279. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21541
  9. H. S. Shin, J. I. Lee, A. Tsourdos, and M. J. Tahk, Homing Guidance Law for Reducing Sensitivity on Heading Error, AIAA Guid. Nav. Contr. Conf., Minneapolis, Minnesota, (2012).
  10. T. L. Song, S. J. Shin, and H. Cho, Impact-Angle-Control for Planar Engagements, IEEE T. Aero. Elec. Sys., 35(4) (1999), 1439-1444. https://doi.org/10.1109/7.805460
  11. C. K. Ryoo, H. Cho, and M. J. Tahk, Optimal Guidance Laws with Terminal Impact Angle Constraints, J. Guid. Control Dynam., 28(4) (2005), 724-732. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.8392
  12. C. K. Ryoo, H. Cho and M. J. Tahk, Time-to-Go Weighted Optimal Guidance with Impact Angle Constraints, IEEE T. Contr. Sys. Tech., 14(3) (2006), 483-492. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2006.872525
  13. I. S. Jeon, J. I. Lee, and M. J. Tahk, Impact-Time-Control Guidance Law for Anti-ship Missiles, IEEE T. Contr. Sys. Tech., 14(2) (2006), 260-266. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2005.863655
  14. J. I. Lee, I. S. Jeon, and M. J. Tahk, Guidance Law to Control Impact Time and Angle, IEEE T. Aero. Elec. Sys., 43(1) (2007), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2007.357135
  15. Y. H. Kim, C. K. Ryoo, and M. J. Tahk, Guidance Synthesis for Evasive Maneuver of anti-ship Missile against Closed-In Weapon Systems, IEEE T. Aero. Elec. Sys., 46(3) (2010), 1376-1388. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2010.5545195
  16. J. Z. Ben-Asher, N. Farber, and S. Levinson, New Proportional Navigation Law for Ground-to-Air System, J. Guid. Control Dynam., 26(5) (2003), 822-825. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5118
  17. J. I. Lee, I. S. Jeon, and C. H. Lee, Command Shaping Guidance Law Based on Gaussian Weighting Function, IEEE T. Aero. Elec. Sys., 50(1) (2014), 772-777. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2013.120353
  18. C. H. Lee, M. J. Tahk, and J. I. Lee, Generalized Formulation of Weighted Optimal Guidance Laws with Impact Angle Constraint, IEEE T. Aero. Elec. Sys., 49(2) (2013), 1317-1322. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2013.6494416
  19. M. Y. Ryu, C. H. Lee, and M. J. Tahk, New Trajectory Shaping Guidance Law for Anti-Tank Guided Missiles, To be appeared in P I Mech. Eng. G-J. Aer., (2014)
  20. C. H. Lee, J. I. Lee, and M. J. Tahk, Sinusoidal Weighted Optimal Guidance Laws, Mech. Eng. G-J. Aer., 229(3) (2015), 534-542.
  21. P. Zarchan, Tactical and Strategic Missile Guidance, fifthEdition, Washington, DC:AIAA (2007)
  22. C. H. Lee, T. H. Kim, and M. J. Tahk, Interception Angle Control Guidance using Proportional Navigation with Error Feedback, J. Guid. Control Dynam., 36(5) (2013), 1556-1561. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.58454
  23. C. H. Lee, T. H. Kim, M. J. Tahk, and I. H. Whang, Polynomial Guidance Laws Considering Terminal Impact Angle and Acceleration Constraints, IEEE T. Aero. Elec. Sys., 49(1) (2013), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2013.6404091
  24. Y. I. Lee, S. H. Kim, and M. J. Tahk, Optimality of Linear Time-Varying Guidance for Impact Angle Control, IEEE T. Aero. Elec. Sys., 48(3) (2012), 2802-2817. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2012.6324662
  25. A. Jamenson and E. Kreindler, Inverse Problems of Linear Optimal Control, SIAM J. Control, 11(1) (1973), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1137/0311001
  26. E. Kreindler, Optimality of Proportional Navigation, AIAA J., 11(1) (1973), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.50424
  27. U. S. Shular and P. R. Mahapatra, The Proportional Navigation Dilemma - Pure or True?, IEEE T. Aero. Elec. Sys., 26(2) (1990), 382-392. https://doi.org/10.1109/7.53445

Cited by

  1. Practical generalized optimal guidance law with impact angle constraint pp.2041-3025, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410018807000