대한통합의학회지 (Journal of The Korean Society of Integrative Medicine)

  • 제3권3호
  • /
  • Pages.17-24
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2288-1174(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-9651(eISSN)
대한통합의학회 (Korean Society of Integrative Medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

과제기반거울치료와 과제기반치료가 만성뇌졸중 환자의 상지 운동기능과 감각, 일상생활 기능에 미치는 영향

Effect of Task-based Mirror Therapy and Task-based Therapy on Motor Function and Sensory of the Upper Extremity and Daily Living Function in Chronic Stroke Patients

  • 김다연 (대구대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 임진용 (대구대학교 물리치료학과)
  • Kim, Dayeon (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Daegu University) ;
  • Lim, Jinyong (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Daegu University)
  • 투고 : 2015.06.23
  • 심사 : 2015.09.20
  • 발행 : 2015.09.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구배경 : 거울치료는 손상된 상지의 움직임 수행 능력을 증가시키기 위한 시각적 고유수용성 감각의 상호작용을 위해 사용 할 수 있는 간단한 치료적인 중재이다. 과제기반거울치료와 과제기반치료가 만성뇌졸중 환자의 팔의 운동기능과 감각, 일상생활 기능에 미치는 효과를 확인하기 위해 실시하였다. 연구방법 : 대상자들은 무작위로 과제기반거울치료군과 과제기반군에 배정되었다. 과제기반거울치료군(15명)은 거울을 통해서 비마비측 사지의 반사 환영을 보면서 마비측 사지의 움직임을 유도하는 반복적이고 대칭적인 운동연습의 상지훈련을 받았다. 과제기반군은 과제를 기반한 상지훈련을 받았다. 치료는 하루 60분, 주 5일, 4주간 실시하였다. 결과 측정은 퓨글메이어 평가, 골격근긴장도, 수정된 Nottingham 감각평가, ABILHAND 설문지로 측정하였다. 연구결과 : 과제기반거울치료군은 과제기반거울치료군은 퓨글메이어 평가점수에서 전체점수와 먼쪽 부분에서유의하게 높은 점수를 보였다. 수정된 Nottingham 감각평가의 모든 항목에서 과제기반거울치료군이 과제기반군보다 유의하게 향상되었다. 골격근 긴장도와 ADL 부분에서는 두 군간 유의한 차이가 없었다. 결론 : 과제기반거울치료군은 만성뇌졸중환자의 상지의 운동기능과 감각회복에 효과적인 치료로 적용될 수 있다.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Agnew ZK, Wise RJ, Leech R(2012). Dissociating object directed and non-object directed action in the human mirror system: implications for theories of motor simulation. PLoS One, 7(4), 32517. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032517
  2. Arya KN, Pandian S(2013). Effect of task-based mirror therapy on motor recovery of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: a pilot study. Top Stroke Rehabil, 20(3), 210-217. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr2003-210
  3. Bohannon RW, Smith MB(1987). Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther, 67(2), 206-207. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/67.2.206
  4. Brass M, Bekkering H, Wohlschlager A, et al(2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain Cogn, 44(2), 124-143. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2000.1225
  5. Chuang LL, Wu CY, Lin KC, et al(2012). Quantitative mechanical properties of the relaxed biceps and triceps brachii muscles in patient with subacute stroke: a reliability study of the myoton-3 myometer. Stroke Res Treat, 2012(2012), 1-7.
  6. Dohle C, Kleiser R, Seitz RJ, et al(2004). Body scheme gates visual processing. J Neurophysiol, 91(5), 2376-2379. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00929.2003
  7. Flor H, Diers M(2009). Sensorimotor training and cortical reorganization. NeuroRehabil, 25(1), 19-27.
  8. Franceschini M, Agosti M, Cantagallo A, et al(2010). Mirror neurons: action observation treatment as a tool in stroke rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 46(4), 517-523.
  9. Garry MI, Loftus A, Summers JJ(2005). Mirror, mirror on the wall: viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability. Exp Brain Res, 163(1), 118-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2226-9
  10. Grezes J, Decety J(2001). Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp, 12(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0193(200101)12:1<1::AID-HBM10>3.0.CO;2-V
  11. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al(1995). Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke, Part II: time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 76(5), 406-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80568-0
  12. Kim YH, Jang SH, Chang Y, et al(2003). Bilateral primary sensori-motor cortex activation of post-stroke mirror movements: an fMRI study. Neuroreport, 14(10), 1329-1332. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200307180-00009
  13. Krakauer JW(2006). Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol, 19(1), 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wco.0000200544.29915.cc
  14. Lee MM, Cho HY, Song CH(2012). The mirror therapy program enhances upper-limb motor recovery and motor function in acute stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 91(8), 689-700. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31824fa86d
  15. Lin KC, Chen YT, Huang PC, et al(2014). Effect of mirror therapy combined with somatosensory stimulation on motor recovery and daily function in stroke patients: A pilot study. J Formos Med Assoc, 113(7), 422-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2012.08.008
  16. Lin KC, Huang PC, Chen YT, et al(2014). Combining afferent stimulation and mirror therapy for rehabilitating motor function, motor control, ambulation, and daily functions after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 28(2), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968313508468
  17. Lin KC, Wu CY, Wei TH, et al(2007). Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on reach-to-grasp movements and functional performance after chronic stroke.: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil, 21(12), 1075-1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215507079843
  18. Lincoln NB, Jackson JM, Adams SA(1998). Reliability and revision of the nottingham sensory assessment for stroke patients. Physiotherapy, 84(8), 358-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61454-X
  19. Michielsen ME, Selles RW, van der Geest JN, et al(2011). Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: a phase II randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 25(3), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968310385127
  20. Michielsen ME, Smits M, Ribbers GM, et al(2011). The neuronal correlates of mirror therapy: an fMRI study on mirror induced visual illusions in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 82(4), 393-398. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2009.194134
  21. Parsons LM, Gabrieli JD, Phelps EA, et al(1998). Cerebrally lateralized mental representations of hand shape and movement. J Neurosci, 18(16), 6539-6548.
  22. Ramachandran VS, Altschuler EL(2009). The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function. Brain, 132, 1693-1710. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp135
  23. Sathian K, Greenspan AI, Wolf SL(2000). Doing it with mirrors: a case study of a novel approach to neurorehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 14(1), 73-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/154596830001400109
  24. Schaefer M, Noennig N, Heinze HJ, et al(2006). Fooling your feelings: artificially induced referred sensations are linked to a modulation of the primary somatosensory cortex. NeuroImage, 29(1), 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.001
  25. Sgandurra G, Ferrari A, Cossu G, et al(2011). Upper limb children action-observation training (up-cat): a randomised controlled trial in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. BMC Neurol, 11(80), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-11-1
  26. Small SL, Buccino G, Solodkin A(2012). The mirror neuron system and treatment of stroke. Dev Psychobiol, 54(3), 293-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20504
  27. Stevens JA, Stoykov ME(2004). Simulation of bilateral movement training through mirror reflection: a case report demonstrating an occupational therapy technique for hemiparesis. Top Stroke Rehabil, 11(1), 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1310/GCFE-QA7A-2D24-KHRU
  28. Thieme H, Mehrholz J, Pohl M, et al(2013). Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Stroke, 44(1), e1-2. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.673087
  29. Wu CY, Huang PC, Chen YT, et al(2013). Effects of mirror therapy on motor and sensory recovery in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 94(6), 1023-1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.02.007
  30. Yavuzer G, Selles R, Sezer N, et al(2008). Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 89(3), 393-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.162

피인용 문헌

  1. Systematic review of the effects of mirror therapy in children with cerebral palsy vol.28, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.3227