Structural Monitoring and Maintenance

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Towards UAV-based bridge inspection systems: a review and an application perspective

  • Chan, Brodie (Griffith School of Engineering, Griffith University Gold Coast Campus) ;
  • Guan, Hong (Griffith School of Engineering, Griffith University Gold Coast Campus) ;
  • Jo, Jun (School of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University Gold Coast Campus) ;
  • Blumenstein, Michael (School of Information and Communication Technology, Griffith University Gold Coast Campus)
  • Received : 2015.03.09
  • Accepted : 2015.08.25
  • Published : 2015.09.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Visual condition inspections remain paramount to assessing the current deterioration status of a bridge and assigning remediation or maintenance tasks so as to ensure the ongoing serviceability of the structure. However, in recent years, there has been an increasing backlog of maintenance activities. Existing research reveals that this is attributable to the labour-intensive, subjective and disruptive nature of the current bridge inspection method. Current processes ultimately require lane closures, traffic guidance schemes and inspection equipment. This not only increases the whole-of-life costs of the bridge, but also increases the risk to the travelling public as issues affecting the structural integrity may go unaddressed. As a tool for bridge condition inspections, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) or, drones, offer considerable potential, allowing a bridge to be visually assessed without the need for inspectors to walk across the deck or utilise under-bridge inspection units. With current inspection processes placing additional strain on the existing bridge maintenance resources, the technology has the potential to significantly reduce the overall inspection costs and disruption caused to the travelling public. In addition to this, the use of automated aerial image capture enables engineers to better understand a situation through the 3D spatial context offered by UAV systems. However, the use of UAV for bridge inspection involves a number of critical issues to be resolved, including stability and accuracy of control, and safety to people. SLAM (Simultaneous Localisation and Mapping) is a technique that could be used by a UAV to build a map of the bridge underneath, while simultaneously determining its location on the constructed map. While there are considerable economic and risk-related benefits created through introducing entirely new ways of inspecting bridges and visualising information, there also remain hindrances to the wider deployment of UAVs. This study is to provide a context for use of UAVs for conducting visual bridge inspections, in addition to addressing the obstacles that are required to be overcome in order for the technology to be integrated into current practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, S.M., Levitan, M.L. and Friedland, C.J. (2013), High Resolution Imagery Collection Utilizing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Post-Disaster Studies, ASCE, Miami, Florida, USA.
  2. Advanced Highway Maintenance and Construction Program (2008), CALTRANS Bridge Inspection Aerial Robot, California Department of Transportation, California.
  3. Aibotix GmbH (2014), Bridge Inspection. [Online] Available at: http://www.aibotix.com/-bridge-inspection.html [Accessed 24 March 2014].
  4. Choset, H. (2000), Bridge Inspection with Serpentine Robots, Highway IDEA Project 56, Washington D.C., USA.
  5. Chanda, S., Bu, G., Guan, H., Jo, J., Pal, U., Loo, Y.C. and Blumenstein, M. (2014), "Automatic bridge crack detection - a texture analysis-based approach", Artificial Neural Networks in Pattern Recognition, 193-203.
  6. Civil Aviation Safety Authority (2002), AC 101:1(0) Unmanned Aircraft and Rockets, Civil Aviation Safety Authority, Australia.
  7. Civil Aviation Safety Authority (2014), Applying for an Operator's Certificate (OC). [Online] Available at: http://www.casa.gov.au/scripts/nc.dll?WCMS:STANDARD:: pc=PC_100377 [Accessed 1 April 2014].
  8. DeGarmo, M.T. (2004), Issues Concerning Integration of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Civil Airspace, Mitre Corporation, November.
  9. Department of Transport and Main Roads (2002), Part 5: Bridge Asset Maintenance, Queensland Government, Queensland, Australia.
  10. Department of Transport and Main Roads (2014), Part 3: Work on Roads, Queensland Government, Queensland, Australia.
  11. Durrant-Whyte, H. and Bailey, T. (2006), "Simultaneous localisation and mapping (SLAM): Part I the essential algorithms", IEEE Robot. Autom.Mag., 13(2), 99-110.
  12. Gambold, K.A. (2011), Unmanned Aircraft System Access to National Airspace, Technical and Air Safety Committee, USA.
  13. Gupta, S. and Ashraf, J. (2012), "Vision based simultaneous localization and mapping", Int. J. Comput.Eng. Management, 15(3), 50-53.
  14. Hachem, Y., Zografos, K. and Soltani, M., (1991), "Bridge Inspection Strategies", J. Performance of Constructed Facilities, 5(1), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1991)5:1(37)
  15. Heintz, F., Piotr, R. and Doherty, P. (2007), "From images to traffic behavior - a UAV tracking and monitoring application", Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Fusion, Quebec, Canada, July.
  16. Hubner, D. and Barton, D. (2003), Guide to Road Design Part 3: Geometric Design, Austroads, Sydney, Australia.
  17. Irizarry, J., Gheisari, M. and Walker, B.N. (2012), "Usability assessment of drone technology as safety inspection tools", J. Infor. Tech. Constr., 17(1), 194-212.
  18. Kamya, B. (2010), "Bridge inspection: Are we getting it right?", Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Life-Cycle Optimisation, Taylor & Francis Group, London.
  19. Koonce, J., Demski, T., Rowe, M. and Morriss, N. (2011), "Bridge inspection access to minimize operational impacts", Proceedings of the AREMA 2011 Annual Conference. Minneapolis, USA, September.
  20. Lattanzi, D.A. and Miller, G. (2013), "A prototype imaging and visualisation system for robotic infrastructure inspection", Proceedings of the Structures Congress 2013, ASCE, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, May.
  21. Neitzel, F. and Klonowski, J. (2011), "Mobile 3D mapping with a low-cost UAV system", Int. Archives Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 38(1), 1-6.
  22. Oh, J., Jang, G., Oh, S., Lee, J.H., Yi, B., Moon, Y.S., Lee, J.S. and Choi, Y. (2009), "Bridge inspection robot system with machine vision", Automat. Constr., 18(1), 929-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.04.003
  23. PTV Planung Transport Verkehr AG (2013), PTV VISSIM 6.0, Karlsruhe, Germany.
  24. Puri, A. (2005), A Survey of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) for Traffic Surveillance, South Florida, USA.
  25. RIEGL Laser Measurement Systems GmbH (2014), RIEGL Laser Measurement Systems. [Online] Available at: http://www.riegl.com/media-events/newsletter/1012-vz-400-marine-mapping-demonstration/ [Accessed 27 March 2014].
  26. RPAS Training and Solutions (2014), UAV/Drone/RPA Training for CASA RPC or UAV Controller Certificates. [Online] Available at: http://www.rpastraining.com.au/ [Accessed 27 March 2014].
  27. Siebert, S. and Teizer, J. (2014), "Mobile 3D mapping for surveying earthworks projects using an unmanned aerial vehicle", Automat. Constr., 41(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.01.004
  28. Srinivasan, S., Latchman, H., Shea, J., Wong, T. and McNair, J. (2004), "Airborne traffic surveillance systems: video surveillance of highway traffic", Proceedings of the ACM 2nd International Workshop on Video Surveillance & Sensor Networks, New York, USA, October.
  29. The National Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse (2013), Fatalities in Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes by State and Work Zone (2012). [Online] Available at: http://www.workzonesafety.org/crash_data/workzone_fatalities/2012 [Accessed 24 March 2014].
  30. Transport Research Board (2000), Highway Capacity Manual, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, USA.
  31. U.S. Department of Transport (2005), Farm Lane Underpass. [Online] Available at: http://contextsensitivesolutions.org/content/case_studies/farm_lane_underpasses/# [Accessed 30 March 2014].
  32. Walker, S. (2014), "The Surveyor's 21st Century Tools", Eng. Mining J., 215(7), 28.
  33. Wang, J., Lin, Z. and Li, C. (2004), "Reconstruction of buildings from a single UAV image", Proceedings of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Congress, Beijing, China, July.

Cited by

  1. Remote Marker-Based Tracking for UAV Landing Using Visible-Light Camera Sensor vol.17, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/s17091987
  2. Towards Autonomous Modular UAV Missions: The Detection, Geo-Location and Landing Paradigm vol.16, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/s16111844
  3. Survey of computer vision algorithms and applications for unmanned aerial vehicles vol.92, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.033
  4. Bridge inspection: human performance, unmanned aerial systems and automation vol.8, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-018-0285-4
  5. Synthesis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Applications for Infrastructures vol.32, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001185
  6. Autonomous MAV-based Indoor Chimney Inspection with 3D Laser Localization and Textured Surface Reconstruction pp.1573-0409, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-018-0791-y
  7. UAV Bridge Inspection through Evaluated 3D Reconstructions vol.24, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001343
  8. Applications of UAVs in Civil Infrastructure vol.25, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000464
  9. Bridge Inspections with Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Case Studies vol.24, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001376
  10. Robotic System for Inspection by Contact of Bridge Beams Using UAVs vol.19, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/s19020305
  11. Texture Mapping of a Bridge Deck Using UAV Images vol.18, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2017.18.6.1041
  12. 드론과 이미지 분석기법을 활용한 구조물 외관점검 기술 연구 vol.17, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5345/jkibc.2017.17.6.545
  13. 교량의 3차원 측정을 위한 UAV 비디오와 사진의 표정 분석 vol.36, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7848/ksgpc.2018.36.6.451
  14. Development of Lifting System for High-Elevation Inspection Robot Targeting Hanger Ropes vol.31, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2019.p0803
  15. Review of Bridge Structural Health Monitoring Aided by Big Data and Artificial Intelligence: From Condition Assessment to Damage Detection vol.146, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002535
  16. UAV Localization System with Subsidiary UAVs for Visual Inspection vol.56, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.9746/sicetr.56.370
  17. RPAS-Based Framework for Simplified Seismic Risk Assessment of Italian RC-Bridges vol.10, pp.9, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10090150
  18. Inspection of surface defects on stay cables using a robot and transfer learning vol.119, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103382
  19. Bridge Inspection with an Off-the-Shelf 360° Camera Drone vol.4, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4040067
  20. Arc Length method for extracting crack pattern characteristics vol.28, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2653
  21. Systematic Tertiary Study for Consolidating further Implications of Unmanned Aircraft System Applications vol.37, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000880
  22. A methodology for measuring the total displacements of structures using a laser–camera system vol.36, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12652
  23. UAV-Based Remote Sensing Applications for Bridge Condition Assessment vol.13, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091809
  24. Drone-Based StereoDIC: System Development, Experimental Validation and Infrastructure Application vol.61, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-021-00710-z
  25. Using the Mavic 2 Pro drone for basic water quality assessment vol.14, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00979
  26. Drone-Based Non-Destructive Inspection of Industrial Sites: A Review and Case Studies vol.5, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5040106