DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

장기계측을 통한 인장형 앵커의 인장력 손실 평가

Evaluation of Loss of Prestress Force of Tensile Anchor by Long Term Measurement

  • Lee, Bongjik (Department of Civil Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation) ;
  • Lee, Jongkyu (Technical Firm DAWON Co., LTD.)
  • 투고 : 2015.07.01
  • 심사 : 2015.09.01
  • 발행 : 2015.10.01

초록

본 연구에서는 앵커의 장기 거동특성과 인장력 손실을 평가하기 위하여 실제 시공된 인장형 앵커를 대상으로 장기 계측을 실시하고 이를 기존 예측결과와 비교 분석하였다. 영구앵커는 비탈면 안정 혹은 구조물의 부상방지 등을 목적으로 사용되는 보강재로써 가설 앵커와 달리 구조물의 공용기간 동안 기능을 유지해야 한다. 그러나 시간 경과에 따라 앵커의 릴렉세이션 및 크리프가 지속적으로 발생되기 때문에 안정적인 기능발휘를 위해서는 인장력 손실에 대한 관리가 필수적이다. 지금까지 인장력 손실은 탄성론을 이용한 프리스트레스 감소와 인장재 종류에 따른 릴렉세이션을 값을 이용하여 산정하여 왔으며 장기적인 계측결과를 이용한 검증은 제한적인 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 실제 시공된 인장형 앵커를 대상으로 현장조건과 상세 지반조사를 실시하였으며 하중계, 경사계 및 지하수위계를 설치하여 최대 500일 이상의 장기 계측결과를 분석하였다. 또한 측정된 벽체의 변위 및 앵커의 인장력 손실을 기존 해석결과와 비교함으로써 앵커의 장기 거동특성을 평가하였다. 평가결과 대부분의 앵커력 손실은 90일 이내에 발생되며, 앵커력 손실은 예측된 값보다 작게 측정되는 것으로 나타났다.

In this study, to evaluate the long-term behavior characteristics and the loss of prestress force, the long-term measurement of the tensile anchors in the actual construction was performed and the results were analyzed comparing with the existing estimation. As the reinforcement member used for the purpose of slope stability or uplift-resisting of the permanent structure, etc, the permanent anchor should maintain the functions during the performance period of the structure differently from the temporary anchor. However, as the time passes by, since the relaxation and the creep of the anchor occur constantly, the management for the loss of tensile force is essential to perform the functions stably. So far, the loss of the tensile force has been estimated according to the reduction of the prestress using elasticity theory and using the relaxation value according to the type of tension member and the test using the long-term measurement is limited. Therefore, in this study, the site condition and the ground were investigated for the tensile anchor in the actual construction and the long-term measurement results more than 500 days was analyzed by installing the loadcell, inclinometer and the groundwater level gauge. In addition, the long-term behavior characteristics were evaluated by comparing the disposition of the measured earth retaining wall and the tension force loss of the anchor with the existing interpretation results. In the evaluation results, the most of the tension force loss occurs within 90 days and the loss was measured less than the estimated values.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Das, B. M. (1990), Earth anchors, Developments in Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 50, pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-88281-3.50006-0
  2. Im, S. S. and Lee, J. S. (1999), Determination of initial prestress force of earth anchors in rock on excavation, Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 3-1, pp. 177-187 (in Korean).
  3. Jang, B. S. (2009), Design, construction and maintenance manual of ground anchor, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, pp. 9-38 (in Korean).
  4. Jung, Y. G. (2010), A study on the long-term behavior characteristics of buoyancy-resistant permanent anchor, Master's thesis, Hanyang University, pp. 23-25 (in Korean).
  5. Lee, B. J., Youn. J. S., Lee, J. K. and Lee, D. H. (2008), Analysis of anchored wall in long term, Korean Geo-Environmental Conference, Korean Geoenvironmental Society, pp. 147-152 (in Korean).
  6. Lee, B. J., Kim, S. S., Youn, J. S. and Lee, J. K. (2010), Pullout characteristics of reinforcing body using re-injection grouting methods, Journal of the Korean Geoenvironmental Society, Vol. 11, No. 10, pp. 25-31 (in Korean).
  7. Ministry of Construction & Transportation (2006), The standards of construction slope, Ministry of Construction & Transportation, pp. 141-149.
  8. Oh, J. B. (1999), Pullout characteristics of anchor to support earth retaining wall, Master's thesis, Konkuk University, pp. 18-20 (in Korean).
  9. Sabatini, P. J., Pas, D. G. and Bachus, R. C. (1999), Geotechnical engineering circular No. 4 ground anchors and anchored systems, FHWA-SA-99-015, Office of Bridge Technology Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C, pp. 6-28.