Geomechanics and Engineering

  • 제9권3호
  • /
  • Pages.373-395
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2005-307X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-6219(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improvement of pavement foundation response with multi-layers of geocell reinforcement: Cyclic plate load test

  • Khalaj, Omid (The Research Centre of Forming Technology, University of West Bohemia) ;
  • Tafreshi, Seyed Naser Moghaddas (Department of Civil Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology) ;
  • Mask, Bohuslav (The Research Centre of Forming Technology, University of West Bohemia) ;
  • Dawson, Andrew R. (Nottingham Transportation Engineering Centre, University of Nottingham)
  • 투고 : 2015.01.26
  • 심사 : 2015.05.10
  • 발행 : 2015.09.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Comprehensive results from cyclic plate loading at a diameter of 300 mm supported by layers of geocell are presented. The plate load tests were performed in a test pit measuring $2000{\times}2000mm$ in plane and 700 mm in depth. To simulate half and full traffic loadings, fifteen loading and unloading cycles were applied to the loading plate with amplitudes of 400 and 800 kPa. The optimum embedded depth of the first layer of geocell beneath the loading plate and the optimum vertical spacing of geocell layers, based on plate settlement, are both approximately 0.2 times loading plate diameter. The results show that installation of the geocell layers in the foundation bed, increase the resilient behavior in addition to reduction of accumulated plastic and total settlement of pavement system. Efficiency of geocell reinforcement was decreased by increasing the number of the geocell layers for all applied stress levels and number of cycles of applied loading. The results of the testing reveal the ability of the multiple layers of geocell reinforcement to 'shakedown' to a fully resilient behavior after a period of plastic settlement except when there is little or no reinforcement and the applied cyclic pressure are large. When shakedown response is observed, then both the accumulated plastic settlement prior to a steady-state response being obtained and the resilient settlements thereafter are reduced. The use of four layers of geocell respectively decreases the total and residual plastic settlements about 53% and 63% and increases the resilient settlement 145% compared with the unreinforced case. The inclusion of the geocell layers also reduces the vertical stress transferred down through the pavement by distributing the load over a wider area. For example, at the end of the load cycle of the applied pressure of 800 kPa, the transferred pressure at the depth of 510 mm is reduced about 21.4%, 43.9%, 56.1% for the reinforced bases with one, two, and three layers of geocell, respectively, compared to the stress in the unreinforced bed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abu-Farsakh, M., Chen, Q. and Yoon, S. (2008), "Use of reinforced soil foundation (RSF) to support shallow foundation", Louisiana Transportation Research Center (LTRC), Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LADOTD), Report No. FHWA/LA.07/424; Baton Rouge, LA, USA,195 p.
  2. American Society for Testing and Materials (2009), "Standard Test Method for Repetitive Static Plate Load Tests of Soils and Flexible Pavement Components, for Use in Evaluation and Design of Airport and Highway Pavements", ASTM, D 1195-09.
  3. American Society for Testing and Materials (2007), "Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils", ASTM, D422-07.
  4. American Society for Testing and Materials (2009), "Standard Specification for Graded Aggregate Material for Bases or Subbases for Highways or Airports", ASTM, D2940-09.
  5. American Society for Testing and Materials (2011), "Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System)", ASTM, D 2487-11.
  6. American Society for Testing and Materials (2012), "Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort", ASTM, D 1557-12.
  7. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) T 221-90 (2010), Repetitive static plate load tests of soils and flexible pavement components for use in evaluation and design of airport and highway pavements.
  8. Bathurst, R.J., Nernheim, A., Walters, D.L., Allen, T.M., Burgess, P. and Saunders, D.D. (2009), "Influence of reinforcement stiffness and compaction on the performance of four geosynthetic - reinforced soil walls", Geosynth. Int., 16(1), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2009.16.1.43
  9. Boushehrian, A.H., Hataf, N. and Ghahramani, A. (2011), "Modeling of the cyclic behavior of shallow foundations resting on geomesh and grid-anchor reinforced sand", Geotext. Geomembr., 29(3), 242-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.11.008
  10. Brito, L.A.T., Dawson, A.R. and Kolisoja, P.J. (2009), "Analytical evaluation of unbound granular layers in regard to permanent deformation", Proceedings of the 8th International on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways, and Airfields (BCR2A'09), Champaign, IL, USA, pp. 187-196.
  11. Chen, R.H., Huang, Y.W. and Huang, F.C. (2013), "Confinement effect of geocells on sand samples under triaxial compression", Geotext. Geomembr., 37(2), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.01.004
  12. Collin, J.G., Kinney, T.C. and Fu, X. (1996), "Full scale highway load test of flexible pavement systems with geogrid reinforced base courses", Geosynth. Int., 3(4), 537-549. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.3.0074
  13. Dash, S.K., Krishnaswamy, N.R. and Rajagopal, K. (2001), "Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell-reinforced sand", Geotext. Geomembr., 19(4), 235-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(01)00006-1
  14. Dash, S.K., Sireesh, S. and Sitharam, T.G. (2003), "Model studies on circular footing supported on geocell reinforced sand underlain by soft clay", Geotext. Geomembr., 21(4), 197-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(03)00017-7
  15. Dash, S.K., Rajagopal, K. and Krishnaswamy, N.R. (2007), "Behaviour of geocell reinforced sand beds under strip loading", Can. Geotech. J., 44(7), 905-916. https://doi.org/10.1139/t07-035
  16. Deb, K. and Konai, S. (2014), "Bearing capacity of geotextile-reinforced sand with varying fine fraction", Geomech. Eng., Int. J., 6(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2014.6.1.033
  17. El Sawwaf, M.A. (2007), "Behaviour of strip footing on geogrid-reinforced sand over a soft clay slope", Geotext. Geomembr., 25(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.06.001
  18. Ghosh, A., Ghosh, A. and Bera, A.K. (2005), "Bearing capacity of square footing on pond ash reinforced with jute-geotextile", Geotext. Geomembr., 23(2), 144-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2004.07.002
  19. Hufenus, R., Rueegger, R., Banjac, R., Mayor, P., Springman, S.M. and Bronnimann, R. (2006), "Full-scale field tests on geosynthetic reinforced unpaved on soft subgrade", Geotext. Geomembr., 24(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.06.002
  20. Keskin, M.S. (2015), "Model studies of uplift capacity behavior of square plate anchors in geogrid-reinforced sand", Geomech. Eng., Int. J., 8(4), 595-613. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.8.4.595
  21. Kim, I.T. and Tutumluer, E. (2005), "Unbound aggregate rutting models for stress rotations and effects of moving wheel loads", Transportation Research Record, J. Transport. Res. Board, 1913, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.3141/1913-05
  22. Koerner, R.M. (2012), Designing with Geosynthetics, (6th Edition), Volume 1, Xlibris Corporation, USA.
  23. Leshchinsky, B. and Ling, H.I. (2013), "Numerical modeling of behavior of railway ballasted structure with geocell confinement", Geotext. Geomembr., 36(1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.10.006
  24. Madhavi Latha, G. (2011), "Design of geocell reinforcement for supporting embankments on soft ground", Geomech. Eng., Int. J., 3(2), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2011.3.2.117
  25. Madhavi Latha, G. and Rajagopal, K. (2007), "Parametric finite element analysis of Geocell Supported Embankments", Can. Geotech. J., 44(8), 917-927. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-039
  26. Moghaddas Tafreshi, S.N. and Dawson, A.R. (2010a), "Comparison of bearing capacity of a strip footing on sand with geocell and with planar forms of geotextile reinforcement", Geotext. Geomembr., 28(1), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.09.003
  27. Moghaddas Tafreshi, S.N. and Dawson, A.R. (2010b), "Behaviour of footings on reinforced sand subjected to repeated loading - Comparing use of 3D and planar geotextile", Geotext. Geomembr., 28(5), 434-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.007
  28. Moghaddas Tafreshi, S.N. and Dawson, A.R. (2012), "A comparison of static and cyclic loading responses of foundations on geocell-reinforced sand", Geotext. Geomembr., 32(5), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.12.003
  29. Niroumand, H. and Anuar Kassim, K. (2013), "A review on uplift response of symmetrical anchor plates embedded in reinforced sand", Geomech. Eng., Int. J., 5(3), 187-194. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2013.5.3.187
  30. Patra, C.R., Das, B.M. and Atalar, C. (2005), "Bearing capacity of embedded strip foundation on geogrid reinforced sand", Geotext. Geomembr., 23(5), 454-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.02.001
  31. Pokharel, S.K., Han, J., Leshchinsky, D., Parsons, R.L. and Halahmi, I. (2010), "Investigation of factors influencing behavior of single geocell-reinforced bases under static loading", Geotext. Geomembr., 28(6), 570-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.06.002
  32. Rajagopal, K., Krishanaswamy, N.R. and Latha, G.M. (1999), "Behaviour of sand confined with single and multiple geocells", Geotext. Geomembr., 17(3), 171-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(98)00034-X
  33. Raymond, G.P. (2002), "Reinforced ballast behaviour subjected to repeated load", Geotext. Geomembr., 20(1), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(01)00024-3
  34. Sitharam, T.G. and Sireesh, S. (2005), "Behavior of embedded footings supported on geogrid cell reinforced foundation beds", Geotech. Test. J., 28(5), 452-463.
  35. Sitharam, T.G., Sireesh, S. and Dash, S.K. (2007), "Performance of surface footing on geocell-reinforced soft clay beds", Geotech. Geol. Eng., 25(5), 509-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-007-9125-8
  36. Sireesh, S., Sailesh, P., Sitharam, T.G. and Anand, J.P. (2013), "Numerical analysis of geocell reinforced ballast overlying soft clay subgrade", Geomech. Eng., Int. J., 5(3), 263-281. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2013.5.3.263
  37. Sireesh, S., Sitharam, T.G. and Dash, S.K. (2009), "Bearing capacity of circular footing on geocell-sand mattress overlying clay bed with void", Geotext. Geomembr., 27(2), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.09.005
  38. Tandel, Y.K., Solanki, C.H. and Desai, A.K. (2014), "Field behaviour geotextile reinforced sand column", Geomech. Eng., Int. J., 6(2), 195-211. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2014.6.2.195
  39. Tanyu, B.F., Aydilek, A.H., Lau, A.W., Edil, T.B. and Benson, C.H. (2013), "Laboratory evaluation of geocell-reinforced gravel subbase over poor subgrades", Geosynth. Int., 20(2), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.13.00001
  40. Tavakoli Mehrjardi, Gh., Moghaddas Tafreshi, S.N. and Dawson, A.R. (2012), "Combined use of geocell reinforcement and rubber-soil mixtures to improve performance of buried pipes", Geotext. Geomembr., 34, 116-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.05.004
  41. Thakur, J.K., Han, J., Pokharel, S.K. and Parsons, R.L. (2012), "Performance of geocell-reinforced recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) bases over weak subgrade under cyclic plate loading", Geotext. Geomembr., 35, 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.06.004
  42. Yang, X., Han, J., Pokharel, S.K., Manandhar, C., Parsons, R.L., Leshchinsky, D. and Halahmi, I. (2012), "Accelerated pavement testing of unpaved roads with geocell-reinforced sand bases", Geotext. Geomembr., 32, 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.10.004
  43. Yoon, Y.W., Cheon, S.H. and Kang, D.S. (2004), "Bearing capacity and settlement of tire-reinforced sands", Geotext. Geomembr., 22, 439-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2003.12.002
  44. Yoon, Y.W., Heo, S.B. and Kim, S.K. (2008), "Geotechnical performance of waste tires for soil reinforcement from chamber tests", Geotext. Geomembr., 26(1), 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.10.004
  45. Zhang, L., Zhao, M., Shi, C. and Zhao, H. (2010), "Bearing capacity of geocell reinforcement in embankment engineering", Geotext. Geomembr., 28(5), 475-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.011
  46. Zhou, H. and Wen, X. (2008), "Model studies on geogrid- or geocell-reinforced sand cushion on soft soil", Geotext. Geomembr., 26(3), 231-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.10.002

피인용 문헌

  1. Protection of Buried Pipe under Repeated Loading by Geocell Reinforcement vol.95, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/95/2/022030
  2. Cyclic Response of Footing with Embedment Depth on Multi-Layered Geocell-Reinforced Bed vol.44, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/44/2/022015
  3. Laboratory Investigation of Buried Pipes Using Geogrid and EPS Geofoam Block vol.95, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/95/2/022002
  4. Vibration of axially moving 3-phase CNTFPC plate resting on orthotropic foundation vol.57, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.57.1.105
  5. Evaluating the Applicability of Geocell-Reinforced Dredged Sand Using Plate and Wheel Load Testing vol.6, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-018-00067-2
  6. Square footing on geocell reinforced cohesionless soils vol.13, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2017.13.4.641
  7. Performance Evaluation of Pavements Constructed on EPS Geofoam Backfill Using Repeated Plate Load vol.221, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/221/1/012007
  8. Load-bearing characteristics of square footing on geogrid-reinforced sand subjected to repeated loading vol.27, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-020-4341-y
  9. The Role of Expanded Polystyrene and Geocell in Enhancing the Behavior of Buried HDPE Pipes under Trench Loading Using Numerical Analyses vol.10, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10070251
  10. Assessment the Role of Expanded-Polysterene Block and Grogrid Layer on Behavior of Buried Pipeline vol.609, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/609/1/012014
  11. Numerical investigation of geocell reinforced slopes behavior by considering geocell geometry effect vol.24, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2021.24.6.589
  12. Investigation of Mechanical and Hydrologic Characteristics of Porous Asphalt Pavement with a Geocell Composite vol.14, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123165