한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제35권4호
  • /
  • Pages.773-790
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

혁신 중학교 과학 수업 사례를 통해 본 구조가 학생과 교사의 행위성에 미치는 영향: 정책과 실천에 대한 시사점

Examining How Structures Shape Teacher and Student Agency in Science Classrooms in an Innovative Middle School: Implications for Policy and Practice

  • 투고 : 2015.05.27
  • 심사 : 2015.06.30
  • 발행 : 2015.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Conducted as an ethnographic examination of science teaching and learning in an Innovative Middle School in Korea, this study employs sociocultural theory to examine how structures afford and limit student participation in an innovative school designed to promote student-centered learning. Data includes teacher and student interviews, student responses to a questionnaire, classroom observations, and analysis of video recordings of ten lessons in two in two 8th grade science classes. Using structure|agency dialectic theory, we identify and describe some structures that afford and limit teacher and student agency at the micro (science classrooms), meso (school), and macro (Korean society) levels to raise some questions about current reform measures, such as innovation schools, that seek to position classroom teachers as agents for change in science education reform in Korea. Findings suggest that while teachers and school administrators play an essential role in structuring learning opportunities at the meso and micro levels, they have limited agency to address structural constraints originating at the macro-level, which can negatively impact teaching and learning in the science classroom. We offer implications for policy and practice and argue the need for more qualitative research, informed by sociocultural theory, to inform science education reform efforts in Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199903)36:3<269::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-T
  2. Anderson, R. D. (1995). Curriculum reform: Dilemmas and Promise. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(1), 33-36.
  3. Anderson, R. D. (1996). Study of curriculum reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  4. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015171124982
  5. Baek, B. B., Song, S. H., Nam, M. J. & Lee, K. A. (2013). The performance analysis of Gyeonggido Innovation School. Suwon: Gyunggido Institution of Education.
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241- 258). New York: Greenwood Press.
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1992). The practice of reflexive sociology (The Paris workshop). In P. Bourdieu & L. J. D.Wacquant (Eds.), An invitation to reflexive sociology (pp. 216-260). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  8. Bray, M. (2013). Shadow education: Comparative perspectives on the expansion and implications of private supplementary tutoring. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 77, 412-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.096
  9. Byun, Y-K. & Kim, H-J. (2001). A study on students' learning culture in middle school. Journal of Educational Research, 11, 21-43.
  10. Choi, H. (2014). An Analysis of the Result of Korean Students' Science Performance in PISA 2012. Cheongram Science Education Research Journal, 20(2), 123-133.
  11. Choi, K., Park, J-Y., Choi, B-S., Nam, J., Choi, K-S., & Lee, K-S. (2004). Analysis of verbal interaction between teachers and students in middle school science classroom. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(6), 1039-1048.
  12. Chung, H-C. (2015, January 28). Busan Pitches 'innovative' schools. Korea Times. Retrieved from http://www.koreatimes.co.kr
  13. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. LA: Sage.
  14. Elmesky, R. (2003). Crossfire on the streets and into the classroom: Meso|micro understandings of weak cultural boundaries, practices and a sense of the game in an inner-city chemistry classroom. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 10, 29-50.
  15. Elmesky, R., & Tobin, K. (2005). Expanding our understanding of urban science education by expanding the roles of students as researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 807-828. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20079
  16. Erickson, F. (1998). Qualitative research methods for science education. In B. J. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1155-1174). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  17. Gaskell, J. (2003). Engaging science education within diverse cultures. Curriculum Inquiry, 33, 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-873X.00262
  18. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; Mahwah, NJ.
  19. Haney, J. J. & McArthur, J. (2002). Four case studies of prospective science teachers' beliefs concerning constructivist teaching practices. Science Education, 86(6), 783-802. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10038
  20. Hirshkowitz, M., Whiton, K., Albert, S. M., Alessi, C., Bruni, O., DonCarlos, L., & Hillard, P. J. A. (2015). National Sleep Foundation's sleep time duration recommendations: methodology and results summary. Sleep Health, 1(1), 40-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleh.2014.12.010
  21. Jang, I-S. & Kim, J-B. (2003). Analysis and future direction of class size studies. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 15(2), 1-21 https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2003.15.1.1
  22. Kang, K-H. (2004). Cross-cultural comparisons of face in interpersonal interaction between Koreans and Americans. Speech & Communication, 3, 262-282.
  23. Kang, S., Han, S., Jeong, Y., & Noh, T. (2001). Comparison of verbal interaction patterns in small-group discussion by learning strategies. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 21(2), 279-288.
  24. Kim, E. (2015). Understanding student and teacher interactions in Korean high school science classrooms from a structure/agency dialectic perspective: Implications for pedagogy and research. Unpublished masters degree thesis. Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  25. Kim, I-T. (2011). A socio-cultural interpretation of 'Silence'act in a communication process. Cogito, 69, 451-483.
  26. Kim, K., Kim, H., Lee, M., & Kim, Y. (2014). Surveys of the child and youth rights of 2014 IV. Sejongsi: National Youth Policy Institute
  27. Kim, N., & Lee, H. (2012). Using CHAT to understand the classroom culture innovations of the first year innovative school project in Seoul. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 20(4), 357-382.
  28. Kwak, Y. (2012). Resarch on ways to improve science teaching methods to develop students' key competencies. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(5), 855-865.
  29. Lee, C. J., Lee, H., & Jang, H-M. (2010). The history of policy responses to shadow education in South Korea: implications for the next cycle of policy responses. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11, 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9064-6
  30. Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2006). Teachers' beliefs and practices in technology-based classrooms: A developmental view. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 157-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782478
  31. Martin, S., Milne, C., & Scantlebury, K. (2006). Eye rollers, risk-takers, and turn sharks: Target students in a professional science education program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(8), pp. 819 - 851. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20154
  32. Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
  33. Nam,M-J., Lee, K-D., Jo, Y-J., & Jung, J-H. (2015). A qualitative study of the role of students in the process of school innovation. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 35(1), 29-54.
  34. Paeng, A-J, & Paik, S-H. (2005). An analysis of science teachers' faith on inquiry lesssons and their science classes. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 49(3), 300-310. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2005.49.3.300
  35. Park, U-H., Choi, D-J., Park, D-J., Cho, S-J., & Ko, J-S. (2009). The concept of educational innovation, it recent tendencies in other countries, and its prospect for the future. Journal of Educational Innovation Research, 19(1), 1-24.
  36. Prenzel, M., Seidel, T., & Kobarg, M. (2012). Science teaching and learning: An international comparative perspective. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 667-678). Springer Netherlands.
  37. Raymond, A. M. (1997). Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher's mathematics beliefs and teaching practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 550-576. https://doi.org/10.2307/749691
  38. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
  39. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education. (2015). 44 Schools Designated as Seoul Innovative Schools. Seoul metropolitan office of education. Retrieved from http://english.sen.go.kr/4_news/news_view.jsp?src=&src_temp=&count=0&boardSeq=320
  40. Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1086/229967
  41. Sewell, W. H. (1999). The concept(s) of culture. In V. E. Bonnell & L. Hunt (Eds.), Beyond the cultural turn: New directions in the study of society and culture (pp. 35-61). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  42. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  43. Siry, C., & Martin, S. N. (2014). Facilitating Reflexivity in Preservice Science Teacher Education Using Video Analysis and Cogenerative Dialogue in Field-Based Methods Courses. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(5), 481-508. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1201a
  44. Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science Magazine, 323(5910), 122-124.
  45. Son, W-J. (2004). Study of instructional reform based on the learning community in Japan. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 42(3), 375-396.
  46. Statistics Korea (2014). Private education expenditure survey. Retrieved from http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1PE301&conn_path=I2
  47. Tobias, S. (1990). They're not dumb. They're different. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
  48. Tobin, K. (1988). Differential engagement of males and females in high school science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(3), 239-252, DOI: 10.1080/0950069880100301
  49. Tobin, K. (2005). Building enacted science curricula on the capital of learners. Science Education, 89, 577-594. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20064
  50. Tobin, K., & Gallagher, J.J. (1987). The role of target students in the science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240107
  51. Yu, E-J., Lee, S-K., Oh, P. S., Shin, M-K., & Kim, C-J. (2008). Case studies of the participation structures in secondary science classrooms: exploring the possibility to develop the 'space for hybrid meaning making'. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(6), 603-617.

피인용 문헌

  1. Unintended knowledge learnt in primary science practical lessons vol.38, pp.16, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1250968
  2. 변화의 주체로서 과학 교사의 행위주체성 탐색 -COVID-19에 따른 원격 수업 실행 사례를 중심으로- vol.41, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2021.41.3.237