DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Attitude, Social Influence, and Self-Efficacy Model Factors on Regular Mammography Performance in Life-Transition Aged Women in Korea

  • Published : 2015.04.29

Abstract

Background: This study analyzed predictors of regular mammography performance in Korea. In addition, we determined factors affecting regular mammography performance in life-transition aged women by applying an attitude, social influence, and self-efficacy (ASE) model. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from women aged over 40 years residing in province J in Korea. The 178 enrolled subjects provided informed voluntary consent prior to completing a structural questionnaire. Results: The overall regular mammography performance rate of the subjects was 41.6%. Older age, city residency, high income and part-time job were associated with a high regular mammography performance. Among women who had undergone more breast self-examinations (BSE) or more doctors' physical examinations (PE), there were higher regular mammography performance rates. All three ASE model factors were significantly associated with regular mammography performance. Women with a high level of positive ASE values had a significantly high regular mammography performance rate. Within the ASE model, self-efficacy and social influence were particularly important. Logistic regression analysis explained 34.7% of regular mammography performance and PE experience (${\beta}=4.645$, p=.003), part-time job (${\beta}=4.010$, p=.050), self-efficacy (${\beta}=1.820$, p=.026) and social influence (${\beta}=1.509$, p=.038) were significant factors. Conclusions: Promotional strategies that could improve self-efficacy, reinforce social influence and reduce geographical, time and financial barriers are needed to increase the regular mammography performance rate in life-transition aged.

Keywords

References

  1. Alewijnse D, Mesters I, Metsemakers J, et al (2001). Predictors of intention to adhere to physiotherapy among women with urinary incontinence. Health Educ Res, 16, 173-86. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/16.2.173
  2. Armstrong K, Moye E, Williams S, et al (2007). Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: a systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Int Med, 146, 516-26. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-146-7-200704030-00008
  3. Bae JM (2014). On the benefits and harms of mammography for breast cancer screening in Korean women. Korean J Fam Pract, 4, 1-6.
  4. Brubaker RG, Wickersham D (1990). Encouraging the practice of testicular self-examination: a field application of the theory of reasoned action. Health Psychology, 9, 154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.9.2.154
  5. Champion VL, Skinner CS, Foster JL (1999). The effects of standard care counseling or telephone/in-person counseling on beliefs, knowledge, and behavior related to mammography screening. Oncol Nursing Forum, 27, 1565-71.
  6. Choo JN, Kim EK (2011). Application of the ASE model to the assertive behavior of non-smoking college students under secondhand smoke exposure. J Korean Acad Community Health Nursing, 22, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2011.22.1.1
  7. Fredman L, Sexton M, Cui Y, et al (1999). Cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and screening mammography among women ages 50 and older. Prev Med, 28, 407-17. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1998.0445
  8. Gang MH, Kim JI, Oh KO, et al (2013). Factors associated with mammography adherence among married Chinese women in Yanbian, China. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 7207-13. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.12.7207
  9. Gijsbers B, Mesters I, Knottnerus JA, et al (2008). Factors associated with the duration of exclusive breast-feeding in asthmatic families. Health Educ Res, 23, 158-69.
  10. Huguley CM, Brown RL (1981). The value of breast selfexamination. Cancer, 47, 989-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19810301)47:5<989::AID-CNCR2820470530>3.0.CO;2-V
  11. In HK (2004). Mammography compliance and influencing factors of low income women group. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chungnam National University, Daejeon.
  12. Janz NK, Schottenfeld D, Doerr KM, et al (1997). A two-step intervention of increase mammography among women aged 65 and older. Am J Public Health, 87, 1683-6. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.87.10.1683
  13. Korean Breast Cancer Society [KBCS] (2013). Breast cancer facts & figures. http://www.kbcs.or.kr/. Date of Access:February 17, 2015.
  14. Korean Cancer Association [KCA] (2007, 2013). Survey results for recognition of women cancer and effort related to breast cancer prevention. Korean Cancer Association: Seoul.
  15. Kim JH, Hyun MY, Kim SY (2009). Job stress, depression, social support, and coping strategies of clinical nurses. Korean J Occupational Health Nursing, 18, 219-31.
  16. Kim YI, Kim JH, Lee CH (2011). Job stress-related factors of Open university distant education students with having job. J Lifelong Learning Society, 7, 157-74.
  17. Kim YI, Lee CH (2007). Factors related to regular mammography screening for outpatients. J Korean Acad Community Health Nursing, 18, 420-30.
  18. Kim YI, Lee CH (2013). Predictors of mammography performance in job women. Korean J Occupational Health Nursing, 22, 343-51. https://doi.org/10.5807/kjohn.2013.22.4.343
  19. Kim YI, Lee CH, Jung HS, et al (2006). Comparative analysis of influencing factors on implementation of mammography for ordinary women and outpatients. J Korean Acad Community Health Nursing, 17, 56-64.
  20. Lechner L, Oenema A, de Nooijer J (2002). Testicular selfexamination (TSE) among Dutch young men aged 15-19:determinants of the intention to practice TSE. Health Educ Res, 17, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/17.1.73
  21. Lee CH, Kim YI, Jung HS, et al (2005). Analysis of factors affecting occupational health nurses' early breast cancer screening. J Korean Acad Community Health Nursing, 16, 68-76.
  22. Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Warda US (1997). Breast cancer screening and related attitudes among Filipino-American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevent, 6, 719-26.
  23. McCaul KD, Sandgren AK, O'Neill HK, et al (1993). The value of the theory of planned behavior, perceived control, and self-efficacy expectations for predicting health-protective behaviors. Basic Applied Social Psychology, 14, 231-52. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1402_7
  24. National Cancer Information Center [NCIC] (2014). The incidence of cancer by age group. http://www.cancer.go.kr/mbs/cancer/subview.jsp?id=cancer_040103000000/. Date of Access: February 17, 2015.
  25. National Health Insurance Service [NHIS] (2013). Diagnosis of five major cancer by age and sex. http://sis.nhis.or.kr/site/sis/ggog023m01/. Date of Access: February 17, 2015.
  26. National Health Insurance Service [NHIS] (2014). Notification about health examination. http://sis.nhis.or.kr/site/sis/ggoz103m01/. Date of Access: February, 17, 2015.
  27. Seo YS, Kim YI (2013). Factors affecting smoking middle school students' intention to quit smoking: on the basis of the ASE model. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs, 24, 471-9. https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2013.24.4.471
  28. Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, et al (2003). American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clinicians, 53, 141-69. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.53.3.141
  29. Thompson B, Montano DE, Mahloch J, et al (1997). Attitudes and beliefs toward mammography among women using an urban public hospital. J Health Care Poor Underserved, 8, 186-201. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2010.0320
  30. Victoir A, Eertmans A, Van den Broucke S, et al (2006). Smoking status moderates the contribution of social-cognitive and environmental determinants to adolescents' smoking intentions. Health Educ Res, 21, 674-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyl071

Cited by

  1. Electrical Impedance Tomography as a Primary Screening Technique for Breast Cancer Detection vol.16, pp.14, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.14.5595
  2. Prevalence and Determinants of Repeat Mammography Among Women from a Developing Country vol.42, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-016-0250-2