DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Knocking Down Nucleolin Expression Enhances the Radiosensitivity of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Influencing DNA-PKcs Activity

  • Xu, Jian-Yu (Department of Radiation Oncology, Harbin Medical University) ;
  • Lu, Shan (Department of Radiation Oncology, Harbin Medical University) ;
  • Xu, Xiang-Ying (Institute of Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Harbin Medical University) ;
  • Hu, Song-Liu (Department of Radiation Oncology, Harbin Medical University) ;
  • Li, Bin (Department of Plastic Surgery Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University) ;
  • Qi, Rui-Xue (Department of Oncology, Jinshan Hospital, Medical Center of Fudan University) ;
  • Chen, Lin (Department of Radiation Oncology, Harbin Medical University) ;
  • Chang, Joe Y. (Stereotatic Body Radiotherapy Program MD Anderson Cancer Center)
  • Published : 2015.04.29

Abstract

Nucleolin (C23) is an important anti-apoptotic protein that is ubiquitously expressed in exponentially growing eukaryotic cells. In order to understand the impact of C23 in radiation therapy, we attempted to investigate the relationship of C23 expression with the radiosensitivity of human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. We investigated the role of C23 in activating the catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs), which is a critical protein for DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) repair. As a result, we found that the expression of C23 was negatively correlated with the radiosensitivity of NSCLC cell lines. In vitro clonogenic survival assays revealed that C23 knockdown increased the radiosensitivity of a human lung adenocarcinoma cell line, potentially through the promotion of radiation-induced apoptosis and adjusting the cell cycle to a more radiosensitive stage. Immunofluorescence data revealed an increasing quantity of ${gamma}$-H2AX foci and decreasing radiation-induced DNA damage repair following knockdown of C23. To further clarify the mechanism of C23 in DNA DSBs repair, we detected the expression of DNA-PKcs and C23 proteins in NSCLC cell lines. C23 might participate in DNA DSBs repair for the reason that the expression of DNA-PKcs decreased at 30, 60, 120 and 360 minutes after irradiation in C23 knockdown cells. Especially, the activity of DNA-PKcs phosphorylation sites at the S2056 and T2609 was significantly suppressed. Therefore we concluded that C23 knockdown can inhibit DNA-PKcs phosphorylation activity at the S2056 and T2609 sites, thus reducing the radiation damage repair and increasing the radiosensitivity of NSCLC cells. Taken together, the inhibition of C23 expression was shown to increase the radiosensitivity of NSCLC cells, as implied by the relevance to the notably decreased DNA-PKcs phosphorylation activity at the S2056 and T2609 clusters. Further research on targeted C23 treatment may promote effectiveness of radiotherapy and provide new targets for NSCLC patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Andersen JS, Lam YW, Leung AK, et al (2005). Nucleolar proteome dynamics. Nature, 433, 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03207
  2. Celeste A, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Kruhlak MJ, et al (2003). Histone H2AX phosphorylation is dispensable for the initial recognition of DNA breaks. Nat Cell Biol, 5, 675-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1004
  3. Chen J, Guo K, Kastan MB (2012). Interactions of nucleolin and ribosomal protein L26 (RPL26) in translational control of human p53 mRNA. J Biol Chem, 287, 16467-76. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.349274
  4. Chen BP, Chan DW, Kobayashi J, et al (2005). Cell cycle dependence of DNA-dependent protein kinase phosphorylation in response to DNA double strand breaks. J Biol Chem, 280, 14709-15. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M408827200
  5. Costantini S, Woodbine L, Andreoli L, et al (2007). Interaction of the Ku heterodimer with the DNA ligase IV/Xrcc4 complex and its regulation by DNA-PK. DNA Repair, 6, 712-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.12.007
  6. Daniely Y, BorowiecJA (2000). Formation of a complex between nucleolin and replication protein A after cell stress prevents initiation of DNA replication. J Cell Biol, 149, 799-810. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.149.4.799
  7. Daniely Y, Dimitrova DD, Borowiec JA (2002). Stress-dependent nucleolin mobilization mediated by p53-nucleolin complex formation. Mol Cell Biol, 22, 6014-22. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.16.6014-6022.2002
  8. Davis AJ, Chen DJ (2013). DNA double strand break repair via non-homologous end-joining. Transl Cancer Res, 2, 130-43.
  9. De A, Donahue SL, Tabah A, et al (2006). A novel interaction [corrected] of nucleolin with Rad51. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 344, 206-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.03.113
  10. Dikomey E, Dahm-Daphi J, Brammer I, et al (1998). Correlation between cellular radiosensitivity and non-repaired doublestrand breaks studied in nine mammalian cell lines. Int J Radiat Biol, 73, 269-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/095530098142365
  11. Fernandes AT, Mitra N, Xanthopoulos E, et al (2012). The impact of extent and location of mediastinal lymph node involvement on survival in Stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 83, 340-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.070
  12. Goldshmit Y, Trangle SS, Kloog Y, et al (2014). Interfering with the interaction between ErbB1, nucleolin and Ras as potential treatment for glioblastoma. Oncotarget, 5, 8602-13. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.2343
  13. Goldstein M, Derheimer FA, Tait-Mulder J, et al (2013). Nucleolin mediates nucleosome disruption critical for DNA double-strand break repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 110, 16874-9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306160110
  14. Guo X, Xiong L, Yu L, et al (2014). Increased level of nucleolin confers to aggressive tumor progression and poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. Diagn Pathol, 9, 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-9-115
  15. Kobayashi J, Fujimoto H, Sato J, et al (2012). Nucleolin participates in DNA double-strand break-induced damage response through MDC1-dependent pathway. PLoS One, 7, 49245. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049245
  16. Nagasawa H, Little JB, Lin YF, et al (2011). Differential role of DNA-PKcs phosphorylations and kinase activity in radiosensitivity and chromosomal instability. Radiat Res, 175, 83-9. https://doi.org/10.1667/RR2092.1
  17. Schokoroy S, Juster D, Kloog Y, et al (2013). Disruption the oncogenic synergism between nucleolin and Ras results in cell growth inhibition and cell death. Plos One, 8, 75269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075269
  18. Silvia T, Caterina B, Vanessa G, et al (2014). Number of mediastinal lymph nodes as a prognostic factor in PN2 non small cell lung cancer: a single centre experience and review of the literature. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 7559-62. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.18.7559
  19. Sone K, Piao L, Nakakido M, et al (2014). Critical role of lysine 134 methylation on histone H2AX for $\gamma$-H2AX production and DNA repair. Nat Commun, 5, 5691. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6691
  20. Xing M, Yang M, Huo W, et al (2015). Interactome analysis identifies a new paralogue of XRCC4 in non-homologous end joining DNA repair pathway. Nat Commun, 6, 6233. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7233
  21. Xu J, Wang K, Zhang X, et al (2010). HSP70: a promising target for laryngeal carcinoma radiaotherapy by inhibiting cleavage and degradation of nucleolin. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 29, 106. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-29-106
  22. Yang C, Maiguel DA, Carrier F (2002). Identification of nucleolin and nucleophosmin as genotoxic stress-responsive RNA-binding proteins. Nucleic Acids Res, 30, 2251-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.10.2251
  23. Zhang B, Wang H, Jiang B, et al (2010). Nucleolin/C23 is a negative regulator of hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis in HUVECs. Cell Stress Chaperones, 15, 249-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12192-009-0138-5

Cited by

  1. Prognostic significance of nuclear or cytoplasmic nucleolin expression in human non-small cell lung cancer and its relationship with DNA-PKcs vol.37, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-4920-6