DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Elementary Students' Modification of Their Scientific Explanations based on the Evidences in Water Rising in Burning Candle Inquiry

초등학생의 증거에 기반한 과학적 설명의 수정 과정 고찰

  • Received : 2015.08.14
  • Accepted : 2015.08.25
  • Published : 2015.08.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the characteristics of elementary science gifted students' modification of scientific explanations based on evidences. For this study, sixteen $6^{th}$ elementary students were participated. The subjects of this study were enrolled in the program for the science gifted. Students were asked to generate initial hypotheses before experiment, and to modify and revise their scientific explanations based on the experiments about water rising in burning candle(s). All the processes of small group discussion during the inquiry were audio-recorded. Students' modification of their scientific explanations were appeared in three types: 1) appropriate connections among evidences, reasoning, and claims, 2) disconnections among evidences, reasoning, and claims and/or use of inappropriate reasoning, 3) scientific explanations without their own understanding. Other problems that students encountered in the processes of modification of their explanations were also discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Gray, R. & Kang, N. (2014). The structure of science arguments by secondary science teachers: Comparison of experimental and historical science topics. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 46-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.715779
  2. Han, G. B., Min, H. J. & Paik, S. H.(2012). The teachers' and students' perceptions on lectures and experiments of law of definite proportion in middle school science classes. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 56(1), 144-158. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2012.56.1.144
  3. Jang, S. & Jeong, S. (2010). Analysis of elementary students' scientific justification activities based on evidence. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(4), 414-426.
  4. Jeong, H. S. & Oh, E. A. (2003). Sixth graders' inquiry understanding for scientific evidence and explanation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23(6), 634-649.
  5. Kim, H. K. & Song, J. W. (2004). The exploration of open scientific inquiry model emphasizing students' argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 24(6), 1216-1234.
  6. Lim, H. & Jeong, I. (2014). Effects of scientific argumentation on argument tasks with incorrect alternative ideas in elementary science classes. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(1), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.1.195
  7. Lim, H. J. & Yeo, S. I. (2012). Characteristics on elementary students' argumentation in science problem solving process. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(1), 13-24.
  8. Lim, J. K., Song, Y. M., Song, M. S. & Yang, I. H. (2010). An analysis on the level of elementary gifted students' argumentation in scientific inquiry. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(4), 441-450.
  9. McNeill, K. L. & Krajcik, J. (2012). Supporting grade 5-8 students in constructing explanations in science: The claim, evidence and reasoning framework for talk and writing. New York, NY: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
  10. National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. National Academy of Sciences.
  11. National Research Council (2002). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. National Academy of Sciences.
  12. National Research Council (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. National Academy of Sciences.
  13. Oh, C. & Yang, I. (2009). The features of the observation and the hypothetical faults generated by pre-service elementary teachers on candlelight inquiry tasks: Focusing on usage of the participants' prior knowledge. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28(2), 93-104.
  14. Walton, D. N. (1990). What is reasoning? What is an argument? Journal of Philosophy, 87, 399-419. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026735
  15. Yang, I. & Cho, H. (2006). Review on the aims of laboratory activities in school science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 24(3), 268-280.

Cited by

  1. 과학 탐구 활동의 유형과 과학 탐구의 특징에 대한 초등 교사의 인식 vol.38, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2019.38.2.163