DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Morphological aspect of the attached bacteria by the sterilization method of the ultrasonic scaling tip

소독멸균 방법에 따른 초음파 스케일링 팁에 부착된 세균의 양상

  • Nam, Seoul-Hee (Department of Dental Hygiene, Masan University) ;
  • Kim, Yu-rin (College of Medical and science, Department of Dental Hygiene, Silla University)
  • Received : 2015.02.11
  • Accepted : 2015.07.30
  • Published : 2015.08.30

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to investigate the bacterial morphology attached on ultrasonic scaler tips using no cleansing solution, alcohol cotton, liquid chemical disinfecting agent, and autoclave method. Methods: Scaling tip was applied to the mouth and the ultrasonic scaler tips were assigned to four groups. Group 1 was control group with no cleansing solution. Group 2 was treated with alcohol cotton. Group 3 was treated with 2% green Y-Na solution in liquid chemical disinfecting agent, and Group 4 was sterilized by autoclave method. Live bacteria were observed by phase contrast microscopy. The scanning electron microscopy(SEM) revealed the morphological characteristics of scaler surface. The type of attached bacteria were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 program. The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA) and Tukey's post-hoc test. Results: The types of sterilization methods had influences on the bacterial viability. The numbers of cocci, bacilli, spiral form bacteria, and filamentous bacteria was observed in $89.00{\pm}3.60%$, $29.67{\pm}3.51%$, $3.33{\pm}0.57%$ and $1.67{\pm}0.57%$ in control group, $31.67{\pm}3.51%$, $63.33{\pm}4.04%$, $2.00{\pm}1.00%$ and $1.67{\pm}0.57%$ in alcohol cotton group, $69.67{\pm}4.50%$, $12.33{\pm}2.51%$, 0% and 0% in liquid chemical disinfecting agent group, and 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0% in autoclave method group. The clean surface of ultrasonic scaler tip was shown on SEM by autoclave method. Conclusions: The most effective sterilization method of ultrasonic scaler tip was the autoclave method. Autoclave method is the most effective sterilization method and can reduce the cross-infection in the dental clinic.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho AY, Park YR. The tooth anatomic features that predispose to periodontal diseases: Review articles. Oral Bio Resear 2005; 29(2): 163-73.
  2. Socransky SS. Microbiology of periodontal disease - present status and future considerations. J Periodontol 1977; 48(9): 497-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.1977.48.9. 497.
  3. Hughes TP, Caffesse RG. Gingival changes following scaling, root planning, and oral hygiene. A biometric evaluation. J Periodontol 1978; 49(5): 245-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.1978.49.5.245.
  4. Kang YJ, Jang GW, Jeong MK. Oral health attitudes and behaviors among clients receiving scaling. J Korean Sco Dent Hyg 2011; 11(5): 773-82.
  5. Boretti G, Zappa U, Graf H, Case D. Short-term effects of phase I therapy on crevicular cell populations. J Periodontol 1995; 66(3): 235-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.1995.66.3.235.
  6. Zappa U, Smith B, Simona C, Graf H, Case D, Kim W. Root substance removal by scaling and root planing. J Periodontol 1991; 62(12): 750-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.12.750.
  7. Ju OJ, Kang EJ, Woo SH, Lee AJ, Lee HJ, Park MY. Recognition between laypersons and dental hygienists on expansion of health insurance of scaling. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2014; 14(3): 431-8. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2014.14.03.431
  8. Bentley CD, Burkhart NW, Crawford JJ. Evaluating spatter and aerosol contamination during dental procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1994; 125(5): 579-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0093.
  9. Miller RL, Micik RE. Air pollution and its control in the dental office. Dent Clin North Am 1978; 22(3): 453-76.
  10. Allsopp J, Basu MK, Browne RM, Burge PS, Matthews JB. Survey of the use of personal protective equipment and prevalence of work related symptoms among dental staff. Occup Environ Med 1997; 54(2): 125-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.54.2.125.
  11. Nam SM. A study on infection control practices by dental hygienists. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2011; 11(1): 135-46.
  12. Yang SY, Oh JM, Song DH, Song BR, Jin Kang MJ, Lee MS, et al. Bacteria reduction ratio by cleansing methods of latex gloves. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2014; 14(4) : 593-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2014.14.04.593.
  13. Jeong JS, Kim DH, Kim MN, Choe MA. Bactericidal effect of waterless alcohol gel hand washing agent. J Korean Biol Nurs Sci 2002; 4(2): 127-37.
  14. Moon SJ, Ku IY. Research on cognition of infection control by dental hygienics student's in some areas. J Korea Contents Assoc 2012; 12(12); 313-20. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.12.313
  15. Bae SS, Lee MS. Study on elements for effective infection control at dental hospitals. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2011; 11(4): 557-69.
  16. Cottone JA, Terexhalmy GT, Molinari JA. Practical infection control in dentistry. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996: 54-276.
  17. Hohlt WF, Miller CH, Neeb JM, Sheldrake MA. Sterilization of orthodontic instruments and bands in cassettes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990; 98(5): 411-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81649-X
  18. Evans R. Acceptance of recommended cross-infection procedures by orthodontists in the United Kingdom. Br J Orthod 1989; 16(3): 189-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/bjo.16.3.189.
  19. Kim KY, Lee EY. Control and prevention of infections in dental patients J Korean Dent Assoc 2006; 44(8): 482-7.
  20. Yoon MS, Choi MS. The analysis of the prevention against virus infection in dental hygienist at medical treatment. J Dent Hyg Sci 2007; 7(2): 1101-6.
  21. Hong SY, Kim JM, Kim SY, Lee SJ, Oh ES, Yang SI, et al. Change in the counts of colony according to hand disinfectants in operating rooms. Clin Nurs Res 2006; 11(2): 91-101.
  22. Cho YJ, Yoon SJ, Ahn HS, Kim SD, Park HK. A Study on infection control practices among dental hygienists. J Korean Soc Qual Assur Health Care 2003; 10(2): 190-203.
  23. Cheong HR, Lee HS. A study on infection control among dental clinic in jeollanam-do: focus on used instrument. J Korean Acad Dent Hyg 2013; 15(4): 307-18.

Cited by

  1. 소독제 별 표면소독 효과 분석 vol.7, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.22671/jkada.2019.7.1.50