DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Levels of Risk Perception using Psychometric Paradigm and Factors Affecting Concerns about Food Risk Elements of Housewives in Daegu

심리측정 패러다임을 이용한 대구 지역 주부들의 식품 위해요소에 대한 위험 지각 수준 및 우려도에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석

  • Kim, Hyochung (Dept. of Human Counseling & Welfare, The Institute of Human Environmental Welfare, Inje University) ;
  • Han, Jin-Young (Graduate School of Education, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Meera (Dept. of Food Science & Nutrition, Kyungpook National University, Daegu Namgu Center for Children's Foodservice Management)
  • 김효정 (인제대학교 생활상담복지학부, 인간환경복지연구소) ;
  • 한진영 (경북대학교 교육대학원) ;
  • 김미라 (경북대학교 식품영양학과, 대구남구 어린이급식관리지원센터)
  • Received : 2015.06.23
  • Accepted : 2015.07.28
  • Published : 2015.08.31

Abstract

This study examined the levels of risk perception of food risk elements by adopting a psychometric paradigm and analyzed factors affecting concerns about food risk elements to obtain basic materials for food safety policy. The data were collected from 296 housewives in Daegu, Korea, by a self-administered questionnaire. Frequency distributions, Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis, factor analysis, Cronbach's ${alpha}$, and multiple regression analyses were conducted by SPSS 21.0. The mean level of concern for food safety was 3.75/5.00 points, and the mean percentage of correct answers about heavy metal contamination was highest among food risk elements. The respondents perceived radioactive contaminated foods, GM foods, and endocrine disruptors as a new, delayed, scientifically unknown, involuntary, serious, and uncontrollable risk in risk perception. According to the result of factor analysis for risk perception, two factors such as non-controllability and dread were categorized. In the risk perception map, radioactive contaminated foods and GM foods were considered as an uncontrollable and dreaded risk, heavy metal contamination, endocrine disruptors, and pesticide residues as a controllable and dreaded risk, and foodborne illness and food additives as a controllable and less dreaded risk. On the other hand, the levels of concerns about food risk elements were higher in order of radioactive contaminated foods, GM foods, and endocrine disruptors. The results of multiple regression analysis showed that age, concern for food safety, percentage of correct answers about food risk elements, non-controllability, and dread influenced the concerns about food risk elements. These results imply that food safety policies should consider differences in consumer's risk perception of food risk elements.

Keywords

References

  1. Cha YJ (2006) A study on risk perception. Korean Policy Studies Review 10: 181-201.
  2. Cha YJ (2007) Risk perception and policy implications for risk analysis: With focus on the lay people in the capital region. Korean Policy Studies Review 16: 97-116.
  3. Cho SO (2008) Housewives' recognition of food safety hazard factors. MS Thesis Chungnam National University, Daejeon. p 1.
  4. Choe JS, Chung HK, Hwang DE, Nam HJ (2005) Consumer perceptions of food-related hazard and correlated of degree of concerns about food. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 34: 66-74. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2005.34.1.066
  5. Choi CW, Jeong JY, Hwang MS, Jung KK, Lee HM, Lee KH (2010) Risk communication study for nanotechnology using risk cognitive map. Environmental Health & Toxicology 25: 187-195.
  6. Choi EJ (2010) A correlation of recognition and knowledge of housewives' on hazardous factors in food safety. MS Thesis Chung-Ang University, Seoul, pp 76-82.
  7. Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Read S, Comb B (1978) How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences 9: 127-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143739
  8. Hahn DW, Lee CH, Chon KK (1996) Korean adaptation of Spielberger's STAI(K-STAI). Kor J Psychol 1: 1-14.
  9. Heo SY, Yoon SW (2013) Analysis of consumer's risk perception about food safety through the analytic lens of psychometric paradigm. J Channel & Retailing 30: 97-116.
  10. Hwang CS (2009) A study on the development of consumer safety sentiment index. Korea Consumer Agency.
  11. Jeong JS (2012) Consumer's food safe sensitivity index development and empirical analysis. Ph D Dissertation Chung-Ang University, Seoul. pp 1-2.
  12. Jo JY (2014) A study of risk communication plans through consumer's perception on the major food incidents since 2000. MS Thesis Chung-Ang University, Seoul, pp 27-28.
  13. Kim H, Kim M (2002) Consumers' awareness and information-seeking behaviors towards genetically modified organism (GMO). Family & Environ Res 40: 73-84.
  14. Kim H, Kim M (2009) Consumers’ awareness of the risk elements associated with foods and information search behavior regarding food safety. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 19: 116-129.
  15. Kim H, Kim M (2012) Awareness and information acquisition behavior regarding food hygiene and safety of college students in Yeungnam region. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 22: 305-314.
  16. Kim HY (2010) Development and propagation of the public education program for the genetically modified foods. KFDA.
  17. Kim HY, Lee MR, Kim HK, An JH, Kim MG, Hong SK, Kim M (2011) Consumer awareness about genetically modified food according to gender and age. Korean J Food Culture 26: 331-343.
  18. Kim KH (2012) Consumer's perception attributed to food-related risks and risk communication. MS Thesis Korea University, Seoul. pp 8-11.
  19. Lee HK (2005) Education and promotion of genetically modified food. KFDA.
  20. Lee KH (2006) Study on the development of the effective food risk communication policy system in Korea. Korea Consumer Agency.
  21. Lee JY, Kim KD (2009) A study on the perception of and concern for food safety among urban housewives. Korean J Food Preservation 16: 999-1007.
  22. Lee YA & Lee NK (2005) Psychological dimensions of risk perception. Korean J Cognitive Sci 16: 199-211.
  23. Liu R, Pieniak Z, Verbeke W (2014) Food-related hazards in China: Consumers' perceptions of risk and trust in information sources. Food Control 46: 291-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.05.033
  24. Nam HJ, Kim YS (2006) A survey on perceived food safety in urban residents. Korean J Food & Nutr 19: 126-142.
  25. Park KH (2009) Consumers' knowledge and reactions about food safety accidents. MS Thesis Suncheon University, Suncheon. p 1.
  26. Sah JY (2012) A study on consumer anxiety about food-technological risk. MS Thesis Seoul National University, Seoul. pp 46-104.
  27. Slovic P (1986) Informing and educating the public about risk. Risk Analysis 6: 403-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00953.x
  28. Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236: 280-285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
  29. Slovic P (2000) The Perception of Risk. London and Sterling, VA. p 20.
  30. Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1984) Behavioral decision theory perspectives on risk and safety. Acta Psychology 56: 183-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(84)90018-0
  31. Yoon YY (2014) Consumer knowledge, perceived risks, and risk acceptance on 10 hazards food factors. MS Thesis Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon. pp 58-79.
  32. http://www.korcham.net/nCham/Service/Economy/appl/KcciReportDetail.asp?DATA_ID=20120926787&CHAM_CD=B001. Accessed on 11. 1. 2015.

Cited by

  1. 영남 지역 대학생들의 식품 위해요인에 대한 위험 지각 특성 연구 vol.27, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2017.8.27.4.450
  2. Analysis on Worry about Meat Safety and Use Status of Meat-related Labeling of Adult Consumers vol.29, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2019.8.29.4.291
  3. 가구 형태별 성인 여성의 전자상거래 식품 구매 실태 vol.25, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2020.25.6.464
  4. Exploring Consumers’ Safety Anxiety about the Food Environment in South Korea vol.31, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2021.8.31.4.236