Geomechanics and Engineering

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dynamic simulation models for seismic behavior of soil systems - Part II: Solution algorithm and numerical applications

  • Received : 2014.04.23
  • Accepted : 2015.04.16
  • Published : 2015.08.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper is the second part of the study for determining the seismic behavior of soil systems. The aim of this part is to present solution approaches for determining seismic site amplification. For this purpose, two solution techniques are used. The first technique is equivalent linear analysis which is mostly used in literature. The other technique is real time parameter updating approach and this approach uses the possibilities of Simulink effectively. A graphical user interfaced (GUI) program called DTASSA standing for Discrete-Time Analysis of Seismic Site Amplification is developed. In DTASSA, automatic block diagram producing system is developed and seismic site amplification for multiple soil layers may easily be investigated in real time. Numerical applications have been carried out to check the reliability of developed algorithm. The results of DTASSA are compared with SUA, EERA and NERA programs for the particular example problems.

Keywords

References

  1. Bardet, J.P. and Tobita, T. (2001), "NERA: A computer program for Nonlinear Earthquake site Response Analyses of layered soil deposits", Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  2. Bardet, J.P., Ichii, K. and Lin, C.H. (2000), "EERA: A computer program for equivalent-linear earthquake site response analyses of layered soil deposits", Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  3. Boaga, J., Renzi, S., Vignoli, G., Deiana, R. and Cassiani, G. (2012), "From surface wave inversion to seismic site response prediction: Beyond the 1D approach", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 36, 38-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.01.001
  4. Ching, J.Y. and Glaser, S.D. (2001), "1D time-domain solution for seismic ground motion prediction", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 127(1), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:1(36)
  5. Choudhury, D. and Savoikar, P. (2009), "Equivalent-linear seismic analyses of MSW landfills using DEEPSOIL", Eng. Geol., 107(3-4), 98-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.05.004
  6. Hashash, Y.M.A., Phillips, C. and Groholski, D. (2010), "Recent advances in non-linear site response analysis", Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, San Diego, CA, USA, May, Paper No. OSP 4.
  7. Idriss, I.M. and Seed, H.B. (1968), "Seismic response of horizontal soil layers", J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. - ASCE, 94(SM4), 1003-1031.
  8. Idriss, I.M. and Sun, J.I. (1992), "User's manual for SHAKE91", Davis: Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, University of California.
  9. Keceli, A. (2012), "Soil parameters which can be determined with seismic velocities", Jeofizik, 16, 17-29.
  10. Kramer, S.L. (1996), Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, pp. 254-280.
  11. Kwak, D.Y., Jeong, C.G., Park, D. and Park, S. (2008), "Comparison of frequency dependent equivalent linear analysis methods", Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October.
  12. MATLAB (2009), The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA.
  13. Peer Strong Motion Database (2015), URL: http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/
  14. Philips, C. and Hashash, Y.M.A. (2009), "Damping formulation for nonlinear 1D site response analyses", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 29(7), 1143-1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.01.004
  15. Phillips, C., Kottke, A.R., Hashash, Y.M.A. and Rathje, E.M. (2012), "Significance of ground motion time step in one dimensional site response analysis", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 43, 202-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.07.005
  16. Robinson, D., Dhu, T. and Schneider, J. (2006), "SUA: A computer program to compute regolith siteresponse and estimate uncertainty for probabilistic seismic hazard analyses", Comput. Geosci., 32(1), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2005.02.017
  17. Rota, M., Lai, C.G. and Strobbia, C.L. (2011), "Stochastic 1D site response analysis at a site in central Italy", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 31(4), 626-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.11.009
  18. Roulle, A. and Bernardie, S. (2010), "Comparison of 1D non-linear simulations to strong-motion observations: A case study in a swampy site of French Antilles (Pointe-a-Pitre, Guadeloupe)", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 30(5), 286-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.12.002
  19. Safak, E. (1995), "Discrete-time analysis of seismic site amplification", J. Eng. Mech., 121(7), 801-809. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:7(801)
  20. Sahin, A. (2015), "Dynamic simulation models for seismic behavior of soil systems - Part I: Block diagrams", Geomech. Eng., Int. J., 9(2), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.9.2.145
  21. Schnabel, P.B., Lysmer, J. and Seed, H.B. (1972), "SHAKE: A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites", Report EERC 72-12; Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  22. Seed, H.B. and Idriss, I.M. (1970), "Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis", Report No. UCB/EERC-70/10; Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, December, 48 p.
  23. SIMULINK - Dynamic System Simulation for MATLAB (2009), The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA.
  24. Sun, J.I., Golesorkhi, R. and Seed, H.B. (1988), "Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for cohesive soils", Report UCB/EERC88/15; Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  25. URL 1, http://www.deprem.gov.tr/sarbis/Shared/Default.aspx (Visited on December 18, 2014)
  26. URL 2, http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/data/ath/KOCAELI/IZT090.AT2 (Visited on December 18, 2014)
  27. URL 3, http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/process.html (Visited on December 18, 2014)
  28. URL 4, http://peer.berkeley.edu/svbin/Detail?id=P1103 (Visited on December 18, 2014)
  29. URL 5, http://peer.berkeley.edu/nga/data?doi=NGA1165 (Visited on December 18, 2014)
  30. URL 6, http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/data/ath/LOMAP/DMH090.AT2 (Visited on December 18, 2014)
  31. URL 7, http://peer.berkeley.edu/svbin/Detail?id=P0782 (Visited on December 18, 2014)
  32. URL 8, http://peer.berkeley.edu/nga/data?doi=NGA0794 (Visited on December 18, 2014).
  33. Vucetic, M. and Dobry, R. (1991), "Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response", J. Geotech. Eng. - ASCE, 117, 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89)
  34. Yang, J. and Yan, X.R. (2006), "PASS: A computer program for practical analysis of layered soil-rock systems", Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  35. Yang, J. and Yan, X.R. (2009), "Site response to multi-directional earthquake loading: A practical procedure", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 29, 710-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.07.008

Cited by

  1. Development of integrated earthquake simulation system for Istanbul vol.68, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0497-y
  2. Automatic 3D soil model generation for southern part of the European side of Istanbul based on GIS database vol.13, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2017.13.6.893
  3. Effect of site amplification on inelastic seismic response vol.18, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-019-0520-y