DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

독도의 국가경관이미지 특성에 관한 연구

Characteristics of National Landscape Image in Dokdo Island

  • 안계복 (대구가톨릭대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 박진욱 (대구가톨릭대학교 조경학과)
  • Ahn, Gye-Bog (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Catholic University of Daegu) ;
  • Park, Jin-Wook (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Catholic University of Daegu)
  • 투고 : 2015.11.05
  • 심사 : 2015.11.26
  • 발행 : 2015.12.31

초록

본 연구는 독도가 대한민국 국민에게 특별한 의미를 갖는 지역이기 때문에, "국가경관이미지"를 갖고 있을 것이라는 가설을 증명하기 진행되었다. 이를 위해 내국인 대학생 51명과 외국인 대학생 44명을 대상으로 어의척도 설문조사를 실시하고 통계분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과 내국인 남녀간에는 큰 차이는 없는 것으로 나타났다. 그렇지만 [독도전체 경관사진]에 대해서는 "상당히 혹은 매우 귀중하고 인상적인 동시에 신비롭고 상징적이다"라는 이미지를 갖고 있었다. 이것은 여타 국립공원의 자연경관에 대한 반응들에서는 찾아 볼 수 없는 독도 특유의 이미지들이다. 한편, 내국인과 외국인의 응답 결과는 모든 변수에서 큰 차이를 보였다. 특히 [독도전체 경관사진]에 대해서 몇몇 경관형용사들 [인상적이다(1.41), 신비롭다(1,25), 상징적이다(1.00), 귀중하다(0.98), 친근하다(0.95), 아름답다(0.93), 흥미롭다(0.85)]은 내외국인 응답자들간 뚜렷한 차를 보였다. 바위 이름 자체에 국가경관이미지와 관련된 이름을 가진 바위들[한반도바위(0.57)]와 [독립문바위(0.51)]에 대해서도 내외국인 응답에 상당한 차이를 발견할 수 있었다. 요인분석 결과 도출된 세 가지 주요 요인 가운데 첫 번째 요인은 국가경관이미지, 두 번째 요인은 독도의 자연성, 세 번째 요인은 독도의 공간감으로 나타났다. 본 조사 연구는 제한된 시간과 여건 속에서 한정적 조사연구가 수행되었지만 추후 좀 더 전 국민을 대상으로 한 확대 연구가 필요하다. 또한 CVM(조건부 가치측정법)에 의한 독도의 경제적 가치 재평가는 조속한 시일 내에 다시 수행될 필요성이 있다.

This study is conducted to prove a hypothesis that Dokdo Island has "National Landscape Image," being a region with special meaning for Korean people. University students(51 Koreans and 44 foreigners) were surveyed on landscape images of Dokdo Island, and the statistical analysis of the survey responses was performed subsequently. The findings showed no substantial difference between the opinions of Korean men and women: Especially the photo of whole Dokdo was highly rated by Korean respondents as "considerably or very valuable and impressive, but also mysterious and symbolic at the same time." These are unique images of Dokdo Island, which are not found in responses to natural landscape of other national parks. Meanwhile, there were significant contrasts between the responses of Koreans and foreigners in every variables. Some landscape adjectives used as semantic differential scale demonstrate remarkable differences between Korean and foreign respondents, particularly on the photo of whole Dokdo: impressive(1.41), mysterious(1.25), symbolic (1.00), valuable(0.98), intimate(0.95), beautiful(0.93), interesting(0.85). There were substantial differences in responses between Korean and foreigners on two rock islands, which have names related with some national image: The Korean Peninsula Rock(0.57) and Independence Gate Rock(0.51). Finally, three primary factors drawn from the factor analysis were (1) national landscape image, (2) natural characteristics of Dokdo Island, and (3) spatiality of Dokdo Island.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cultural Heritage Administration(2009). Natural Heritage of Korea Dokdo Island.
  2. Research Institute for Dokdo and Ulleungdo Island(2014). Final Monitering Report of Dokdo Island Natural Reserve.
  3. The Kyunghyang Shinmun(2015. 8. 12). We are residents of Dokdo. http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?artid=201508121409261&code=960100
  4. Kim, E. S.(2010). Study of Evaluation of Korea National Image Depend on Visual Image Analysis Factors, Ph.D. Thesis, Sejong University : 8-16.
  5. Jung, B. C.(2006). A Study on Japan Image Appeared News about Dok-Do in Korean Press, Master's Thesis, Dong-A University.
  6. Joo, S. H. and Im, S. B.(2003). A Study on the Landscape Adjectives for Urban Landscape Analysis, Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 31(1): 1-10.
  7. Suh, J. H., Park, T. H., and Hoe, J.(2004). An Analysis on the Image and Visual Preference of the Environmental Sculpture in Urban Streetscapes, Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 32(1): 57-68.
  8. Joo, S. H.(2012). The Study on the Landscape Preference and Characteristics of the Agricultural Aqueduct Bridges, Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning 18(3): 67-76. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2012.18.3.067
  9. Kim, S. B. and Rho, J. H.(2008). A Study on Assessment Comparison of Natives' and Foreigners' Landscape Preference to Jeju Oreum, Disertation of Institute of Recreation and Landscape Planning 2(1): 1-12.
  10. Kim, S. C.(1990). A Study on the Visual Preference of Landscape of in Chiri Mountain National Park. Journal of Agriculture, Chonbuk National University 21: 285-334.
  11. Kim, S. C.(1994). Quantitative Analysis of Landscape in Tokyusan National Park, Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 7(2): 231-240.
  12. Kim, S. C.(1996). The Assessment of Visual Preference and Landscape Image in Odaesan National Park, Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 9(2): 232-249.
  13. Kim, S. C. and Huh J.(2007). A Study on the Image and Visual Preference for the Seongpanak District at the Mt. Hallasan. Korean Journal of Environment Ecology 21(2): 134-140.
  14. Yi, Y. K.(2004). Characteristic Analysis of Natural Landscape: Based on the Assessments of Naturalness by Landscape Professionals and Lay persons. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 32(6): 1-14.
  15. Yun H. J.(2011). An Analysis of the Evaluation Difference on Shape Characteristics of Natural Landscape at National Park, Journal of Tourism Sciences 35(5): 215-233.
  16. Ahn G. B.(1986). A Study on the Improvements in the Cathedral Outdoor-Space(II), Journal of Catholic Educational Research, Hyosung Women's University 1: 271-289.
  17. Daegu Ministry of Environment(2013). Ecological Monitering Report of Dokdo Island
  18. National Institute of Environmental Research(2013). National Survey of Landscape.
  19. Im, S. B.(1991). Theory of Landscape Assessment, Seoul National University Press.
  20. Kim, S. I.(2004). The relationship among Motivation, Destination Image, Satisfaction and Loyalty of Dokdo Tourist. Master's Thesis of Hanyang University: 52.
  21. National Geographic Information Institute: http://dokdo.ngii.go.kr/dokdo/board/list.do?rbsIdx=39
  22. Dokdo of Korea: http://www.dokdo.go.kr/pages/main/
  23. Dokdo Research Institute: http://www.dokdohistory.com/kr/