DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Methodology for Prioritizing Sidewalk Construction among 100 Candidate Sites on Rural National Highways

지방부 국도에서의 보도설치 우선순위 결정을 위한 방법론 개발 (일반국도 적용사례 중심으로)

  • 전우훈 (한국건설기술연구원 도로연구소) ;
  • 양충헌 (한국건설기술연구원 도로연구소, 과학기술연합대학교대학원 교통물류 및 ITS공학과) ;
  • 윤정은 (한국건설기술연구원 도로연구소) ;
  • 양인철 (한국건설기술연구원 도로연구소, 과학기술연합대학교대학원 교통물류 및 ITS공학과)
  • Received : 2015.06.08
  • Accepted : 2015.07.30
  • Published : 2015.08.17

Abstract

PURPOSES: The purpose of this study is to develop a methodology to prioritize sidewalk construction on rural national highways. METHODS : In order to determine an appropriate prioritization for sidewalk construction, we developed a specific methodology. The proposed methodology includes three main steps: 1) Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods, 2) Subjective evaluation of relevant road agencies for the candidate sidewalks along rural national highways, and 3) Field study conduction. Each step has four phases. The primary feature of this methodology is the addition of expert consultation and survey data, as well as a field study. In addition, the method could guarantee flexibility in selection for evaluation criteria. As a result, the proposed methodology could be used as a general procedure for application to other roadway classifications when considering sidewalk construction. RESULTS: In order to demonstrate the reasonableness of the proposed methodology, a case study was performed for exactly 100 candidate sites for sidewalk construction on rural national highways. All required evaluation scores were properly produced for each candidate site. By doing so, decision-makers can determine the priority for sidewalk construction at these sites by reviewing quantitatively and qualitatively considered data. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the case study can be applied to a long-term fundamental plan for sidewalk construction on rural national highways. Furthermore, this methodology could be employed to prioritize a small-scale SOC project(e. g. bicycle or pedestrian roads).

Keywords

References

  1. Holguin-Veras (1995), Comparative Assessment of AHP and MAV in Highway Planning : CASE STUDY, Journal of Transportation engineering, Vol. 121, No. 2, pp. 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1995)121:2(191)
  2. Jang, S. Yong et al. (2010), A Exploratory Study on an Introduction of a Walking Safety Measure for Walking Right.
  3. Jeon, W. Hoon et al. (2012), Determining Priority of the Bikeway Construction in Rural National Highways.
  4. Kim, K. and V. Bernardin (2000), Application of an Analytical Hierarchy Process at the Indiana Department of Transportation for Prioritizing Major Highway Capital Investments, Proceeding of the 7th TRB Conference on the Application of Transportation Planning Methods, pp. 266-278.
  5. Kim, Y. et al. (2006), A Study Report on Establishment of a Master Plan of Pedestrian Crossing Lighting Installation in a National Highway.
  6. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2012), Comments on Regulations of Road Structure and Facility Standards.
  7. The City of Kirkland (2009), More People, More Places, More Often. An Active Transportation Plan, Section 5, pp. 77-91.
  8. www.olympia.gov (2013), Sidewalk Construction.