DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Implementation and Verification of Linear Cohesive Viscoelastic Contact Model for Discrete Element Method

선형 부착성 점탄성 접촉모형의 DEM 적용 및 해석적 방법을 이용한 검증

  • Received : 2015.04.20
  • Accepted : 2015.07.30
  • Published : 2015.08.17

Abstract

PURPOSES: Implementation and verification of the simple linear cohesive viscoelastic contact model that can be used to simulate dynamic behavior of sticky aggregates. METHODS: The differential equations were derived and the initial conditions were determined to simulate a free falling ball with a sticky surface from a ground. To describe this behavior, a combination of linear contact model and a cohesive contact model was used. The general solution for the differential equation was used to verify the implemented linear cohesive viscoelastic API model in the DEM. Sensitivity analysis was also performed using the derived analytical solutions for several combinations of damping coefficients and cohesive coefficients. RESULTS : The numerical solution obtained using the DEM showed good agreement with the analytical solution for two extreme conditions. It was observed that the linear cohesive model can be successfully implemented with a linear spring in the DEM API for dynamic analysis of the aggregates. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that the derived closed form solutions are applicable for the analysis of the rebounding behavior of sticky particles, and for verification of the implemented API model in the DEM. The assumption of underdamped condition for the viscous behavior of the particles seems to be reasonable. Several factors have to be additionally identified in order to develop an enhanced contact model for an asphalt mixture.

Keywords

References

  1. Delaney, G., Inagaki, S., and Aste, T. 2007, Fine tuning dem simulations to perform virtual experiments with threedimensional granular packings. Lect. Notes Complex Syst 8, 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812771995_0009
  2. Fries, L., Antonyuk, S., Heinrich, S., and Palzer, S. 2011, DEM?CFD modeling of a fluidized bed spray granulator, Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 66, 2340-2355 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.02.038
  3. Howell K. 2013, Ordinary differential equations: An Introduction to the Fundamentals UAH, Hayden-McNeil Publishing.
  4. Kafui, DK.. Johnson, S., Thornton, C. and Seville, JPK. .2011. Parallelization of a Lagrangian-Eulerian DEM/CFD code for application to fluidized beds. Powder Technol., Vol. 207, 270-278 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2010.11.008
  5. Nagurka, M., Huang, S. 2006, A Mass-Spring-Damper Model of a Bouncing Ball, Int. J. Engng. Vol. 22. No. 2, 393-401
  6. Yun, T., Underwood, BS., and Kim, YR., 2009, Time-temperature superposition for HMA with growing damage and permanent strain in confined tension and compression, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 22, Issue 5, 415-422. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000039
  7. Zhang, MH., Chu, KW., Wei, F., and Yu, AB. 2008, A CFD?DEM study of the cluster behavior in riser and downer reactors, Powder Technol., Vol. 184, 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2007.11.036
  8. Zhao, J., Shan, T., 2013, Coupled CFD-DEM simulation of fluidparticle interation in geomechanics, Powder Technology. Vol. 239, 248-258 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2013.02.003