Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science (한국산림과학회지)

Korean Society of Forest Science (한국산림과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on a Macroscopic Evaluation Method of Forest Recreation Function

산림 휴양기능의 거시적 평가방법에 관한 연구

  • Chae, Mie Oak (Research Institute of Korea Appraisal Board) ;
  • Lee, Kilyong (Land Management and Urban Research Division, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements) ;
  • Jun, Eunsun (Land Management and Urban Research Division, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements) ;
  • Song, Ha Seung (Housing and Land Research Division, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements)
  • 채미옥 (한국감정원 부동산연구원) ;
  • 이길용 (국토연구원 국토관리도시연구본부) ;
  • 전은선 (국토연구원 국토관리도시연구본부) ;
  • 송하승 (국토연구원 주택.토지연구본부)
  • Received : 2014.07.09
  • Accepted : 2015.03.02
  • Published : 2015.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study suggests a macroscopic method of evaluating forest recreation function based on physical characteristics of forests. The method was verified by a correlation between forest recreation function in popular top 45 mountains and popularity among them, with using data-mountain area, height, distance between mountain and cities, population around mountain, and size of public service. According to analysis of the forest recreation function, it is shown that top 8 mountains, including Jirisan and Seoraksan, provide over 64% of total recreation function, while they serve the function relatively lower than mountains near mega cities-Bukhansan in Seoul-do, in terms of the function per unit area ($km^2$). It is because, in a case of national and provincial mountains, the size of mountain is likely a critical factor for determining recreation function and the distance influences on it relatively lower. These findings implicate that a large size of forests bring the recreation function to visitors on nationwide level, whileas forests in suburban provide intensively it to near population to near population.

소득수준 향상과 주5일 근무 등으로 관광휴양 수요가 증대되면서 산림이 가진 휴양기능의 중요성도 높아지고 있다. 이 논문에서는 산의 물리적 특성에 기초하여 거시적인 산림휴양기능량 평가 방법을 검토하였다. 이 방법으로 인기 명산 45개의 산림 휴양기능량을 평가하였으며, 산의 면적, 산의 높이, 산까지의 거리, 배후지 인구규모, 공익용산지 면적 비율 등을 기초자료로 이용하였다. 본 모형의 적정성은 산림 휴양기능량과 인기 산 순위간의 상관관계로 검증하였으며, 상관계수는 0.575이었다. 산림 휴양기능량 분석결과를 보면, 지리산을 포함한 상위 8개 산들이 전체 휴양기능량의 약 64%를 제공하는 것으로 나타났다. 반면, 단위면적당($km^2$) 휴양기능량은 지리산, 설악산 등의 명산이 북한산과 같은 대도시 인근의 산보다 낮게 평가되었다. 그 원인은 산의 면적, 접근거리 등과 같이 산림 휴양기능량을 결정하는 주요 인자의 차이에 있었다. 즉, 국 도립 공원의 산림 휴양기능량은 산의 면적에 따라 90% 이상이 결정되는 반면, 산으로의 접근 거리는 영향력이 매우 미미하여, 단위면적당 산림 휴양기능량이 상대적으로 낮게 평가되었다. 따라서 국 도립 공원으로 지정된 크고 높은 산은 전국의 인구가 잠재 수요층이기 때문에 전국을 대상으로 산림 휴양기능을 제공하지만, 대도시 인근의 산은 배후지역의 높은 인구를 대상으로 더 집약적인 산림 휴양기능을 제공한다는 것을 시사한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bartczak, A., Lindhjem, H., Navrud, S., Zandersen, M., and Zylicz, T. 2008. "Valuing Forest Recreation on the National Level in a Transition Economy: The Case of Poland", Forest Policy and Economics 10(7-8): 467-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.04.002
  2. Chae, M.O., Shim, J.H., Ahn, Y.A., and Lee, K.Y. 2013. A Study on Forest Benefits, Korea Forestry Service.
  3. Chae, M.O., Son, H.K., Shin, J.H., Ahn, Y.A., Choi, S., and Hwang, B.C. 2011, A Study on the Transfer System of Forest Conservation Right. Korea Forest Service.
  4. Han, S.J., Lee, W.G., and Gwak, D.A. 2006. GIS Application for Evaluating Forest Recreation Functions. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies (9)1: 13-19.
  5. Han, S.Y. 2003. An Application of Turnbull Distribution-Free Model on Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 7(1): 1-6.
  6. Jang, J.Y. and Woo, J.C. 2010. "A Study on Factor Analysis of Forest Recreation Functions by Survey -Applying Weight, Importance, Priority-". A Workshop Presentation File of Korea Forestry Society 2010(0): 61-64.
  7. Joo, L.W., Park, G.S., Yoon, Y.C., and Kim, K.D. 2007. A Basic Research on Payment Scheme for Forest Ecosystem Services. Korea forest research institute.
  8. Kim, H.H., Jung, J.S., and Kim, J.H. 2003. Analyzing the Relative Improtance of Major Forest Environment Factors in Evaluating the Potential of Forest Lands for Forest Functions. Journal of Korean Forestry Society 92(4): 333-339.
  9. Kim, H.H., Park, Y.G., Noh, H.J., Jun, J.H., Hwang, J.Y., Kang, H.D., and Park, J.H. 2011. A case study for Evaliating Forest Functions by Watershed Unit: Gyeongsangnam- do. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 14(3): 163-173. https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2011.14.3.163
  10. Kim, H.S. 2008. Evaluation of Forest Recreation Functions through Quantification Method II. Journal of Korean Forestry Society 97(4): 437-444.
  11. Kim, J.H., Kim, J.J., Jun, J.H., Son, Y.M., Kim, K.H., Yoon, H.J., Park, C.Y., and Lee, S.W. 2007. A Study on the Quantification of Forest Benefits. Korea Forest Research Institute.
  12. Kim, J.H., Lee, K.H., Park, C.W., Suh, J.W., Son, Y.M., Kim, K.H., Yoon, H.J., Park, C.Y., Lee, S.W., and Oh, J.S. 2006. Nonmarket Valuation of Forest Resources in Korea. The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 10(2): 7-15.
  13. Kim, J.S. and Byun, W.H. 2003. A Comparative Analysis on WTP's of Forest Recreation Benefit. A Workshop Presentation File of Korea Forestry Society 2003(0): 179-181.
  14. Kim, Y.P., Han, S.H., Kim, M.J., and Kim, H.J. 2007. Development of Simulation system for Financial Investment Impact Assessment and Set-up of National Development Index(I): Based on System Dynamics Approach. KRIIHS.
  15. Korea forest research institute. 2011. A study on the Develoopment of the Methodology to Value the Social and Environmental Benefits of Forests, Connected with Payment Scheme for Forest Ecosystem Services.
  16. Korea Forest Service. 1999. A Study on the Quantification of Forest Benefits. Korea Forest Service.
  17. Korea Forest Service. 2004. A Handbook of Mountainous Districts Management Act. Korea Forest Service.
  18. Lee, S.T. and Lee, M.H. 1998. "A study on measuring Palgongsan Mountain's Value of Benefits by Travel Cost Method. Environmental and Resource Economics Review 7(2): 211-228.
  19. Scarpa, R., Chilton, S.M., Hutchinson, W.G., and Buongiorno, J. 2000. "Valuing the Recreational Benefits From the Creation of Nature Reserves in Irish Forests", Ecological Economics 33(2): 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00143-3
  20. Shin, Y.G. and Jang, C.S. 2006. A study on Forest Benefits and its Returning Plan. Korea Forestry Service.
  21. Popular mountains(Statistical data). Korea mountains and Streams (http://www.koreasanha.net). [2014.1.10.]
  22. Yoon, Y.C. and Kim, S.I. 1992. "A study on Comparative Method of Contingent Valuation Method for Forest Recreation Benefits Evaluation. Environmental and Resource Economics Review 1(1): 155-184.
  23. Zandersen, M. and Tol, R.S.J. 2009. "A Meta-analysis of Forest Recreation Values in Europe", Journal of Forest Economics 15(1-2): 109-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2008.03.006

Cited by

  1. 군집분석을 이용한 산촌경관 유형 구분 및 특성 분석 vol.26, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2020.26.1.101