DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Management of Alveolar Cleft

  • Kyung, Hyunwoo (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Nakheon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2015.08.05
  • Accepted : 2015.08.06
  • Published : 2015.08.09

Abstract

The alveolar cleft has not received as much attention as labial or palatal clefts, and the management of this cleft remains controversial. The management of alveolar cleft is varied, according to the timing of operation, surgical approach, and the choice of graft material. Gingivoperiosteoplasty does not yet have a clear concensus among surgeons. Primary bone graft is associated with maxillary retrusion, and because of this, secondary bone graft is the most widely adopted. However, a number of surgeons employ presurgical palatal appliance prior to primary alveolar bone graft and have found ways to minimize flap dissection, which is reported to decrease the rate of facial growth attenuation and crossbite. In this article, the authors wish to review the literature regarding various advantages and disadvantages of these approaches.

Keywords

References

  1. von Eiselsberg F. Zur technik der uranoplastik. Arch Klin Chir 1901;64:509-29.
  2. Drachter R. Die gaumenspalte und deren operative behandlung. Dtsch Zschr Chir 1914;131:1-89.
  3. Schrudde J, Stellmach R. Primary osteoplasty of defects oftheinferior maxillary arch in cleft palate and harelip in infants; preliminary report. Zentralbl Chir 1958;83:849-59.
  4. Skoog T. The use of periosteum and Surgicel for bone restoration in congenital clefts of the maxilla: a clinical report and experimental investigation. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1967;1:113-30. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316709022841
  5. Bajaj AK, Wongworawat AA, Punjabi A. Management of alveolar clefts. J Craniofac Surg 2003;14:840-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200311000-00005
  6. Daw JL Jr, Patel PK. Management of alveolar clefts. Clin Plast Surg 2004;31:303-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1298(03)00129-9
  7. Skoog T. Repair of unilateral cleft lip deformity: maxilla, nose and lip. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:109-33. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036702
  8. Millard D. Presurgicla maxillary orthopedics. In: Millard DR, editor. Cleft craft: the evolution of its surgery. Boston: Little, Brown; 1980. p. 263-98.
  9. Grayson BH, Santiago PE, Brecht LE, Cutting CB. Presurgical nasoalveolar molding in infants with cleftlip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999;36:486-98. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1999)036<0486:PNMIIW>2.3.CO;2
  10. Santiago PE, Grayson BH, Cutting CB, Gianoutsos MP, Brecht LE, Kwon SM. Reduced need for alveolar bone grafting by presurgical orthopedics and primary gingivoperiosteoplasty. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998;35:77-80. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1998)035<0077:RNFABG>2.3.CO;2
  11. Wang YC, Liao YF, Chen PK. Outcome of gingivoperiosteoplasty for the treatment of alveolar clefts in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;51:650-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.09.012
  12. Matic DB, Power SM. Evaluating the success of gingivoperiosteoplasty versus secondary bone grafting in patients with unilateral clefts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1343-53. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000304604.89450.ae
  13. Sato Y, Grayson BH, Garfinkle JS, Barillas I, Maki K, Cutting CB. Success rate of gingivoperiosteoplasty with and without secondary bone grafts compared with secondary alveolar bone grafts alone. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1356-67. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000302461.56820.c9
  14. Wood RJ, Grayson BH, Cutting CB. Gingivoperiosteoplasty and midfacial growth. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997;34:17-20. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1997)034<0017:GAMG>2.3.CO;2
  15. Hsieh CH, Ko EW, Chen PK, Huang CS. The effect of gingivoperiosteoplasty on facial growth in patient swith complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2010;47:439-46. https://doi.org/10.1597/08-207
  16. Nguyen PD, Lin CD, Allori AC, Schachar JS, Ricci JL, Saadeh PB, et al. Scaffold-based rhBMP-2 therapy in a rat alveolar defect model: implications for human gingivoperiosteoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:1829-39. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bf8024
  17. Rosenstein S, Kernahan D, Dado D, Grasseschi M, Griffith BH. Orthognathic surgery in cleft patients treated by early bone grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87:835-92. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199105000-00003
  18. Ross RB. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 1987;24:5-77.

Cited by

  1. Current Methods for the Treatment of Alveolar Cleft vol.44, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.188
  2. The role of 3D printing in treating craniomaxillofacial congenital anomalies vol.110, pp.13, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.1345
  3. New Classification System for Cleft Alveolus: A Computed Tomography-based Appraisal vol.21, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2849
  4. Medial Femoral Condyle Flap for Persistent Alveolar Cleft Reconstruction vol.1, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/2732501620973031