DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of masonry infill on reinforced concrete frame structures' seismic response

  • Muratovic, Amila (Department of Construction, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Sarajevo) ;
  • Ademovic, Naida (Department of Construction, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Sarajevo)
  • 투고 : 2015.04.17
  • 심사 : 2015.06.12
  • 발행 : 2015.06.25

초록

In reality, masonry infill modifies the seismic response of reinforced concrete (r.c.) frame structures by increasing the overall rigidity of structure which results in: increasing of total seismic load value, decreasing of deformations and period of vibration, therefore masonry infill frame structures have larger capacity of absorbing and dissipating seismic energy. The aim of the paper is to explore and assess actual influence of masonry infill on seismic response of r.c. frame structures, to determine whether it's justified to disregard masonry infill influence and to determine appropriate way to consider infill influence by design. This was done by modeling different structures, bare frame structures as well as masonry infill frame structures, while varying masonry infill to r.c. frame stiffness ratio and seismic intensity. Further resistance envelope for those models were created and compared. Different structures analysis have shown that the seismic action on infilled r.c. frame structure is almost always twice as much as seismic action on the same structure with bare r.c. frames, regardless of the seismic intensity. Comparing different models resistance envelopes has shown that, in case of lower stiffness r.c. frame structure, masonry infill (both lower and higher stiffness) increased its lateral load capacity, in average, two times, but in case of higher stiffness r.c. frame structures, influence of masonry infill on lateral load capacity is insignificant. After all, it is to conclude that the optimal structure type depends on its exposure to seismic action and its masonry infill to r.c. frame stiffness ratio.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arulselvan, S. and Subramanian, K. (2008), "Experimental investigation on three dimensional RC infilled frame - RC plane frame interactions with slab for seismic resistance", Am. J. Appl. Sci., 5, 328-333. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2008.328.333
  2. Arulselvan, S., Subramanian, K., Perumal Pillai, E.B. and Santhakumar, A.R. (2007), "RC infilled frame - RC plane frame interactions for seismic resistance", J. Appl. Sci., 7 (7), 942-950. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2007.942.950
  3. Bachmann, H. (2003), Seismic Conceptual Design of Buildings - Basic Principles for Engineers, Architects, Building Owners, and Authorities, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation.
  4. Muratovic, A. (2014), Influence of masonry infill on seismic response of frame structures, Masters Dissertation, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo.
  5. Sezen, H. et al. (2000), Structural Engineering Reconnaissance of the Koaceli (Izmit) Turkey Earthquake of August 17 1999, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
  6. Stradivaris, A. (2009), Analytical and experimental study of seismic performance of reinforced concrete frames infilled with masonry walls, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
  7. Tomazevic, M. (1999), Earthquake-Resistant Design of Masonry Buildings, Imperial College Press, London, UK.
  8. Zarnic, R. (1994), "Inelastic model of R/C frame with masonry infill - analytical approach", Int. J. Eng. Modell., 7, 1-2.

피인용 문헌

  1. Insights from existing earthquake loss assessment research in Croatia vol.13, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.4.365
  2. Rigid block coupled with a 2 d.o.f. system: Numerical and experimental investigation vol.9, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2020.9.6.539
  3. Seismic demand model class uncertainty in seismic loss analysis for a code-designed URM infilled RC frame building vol.19, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00994-x