Difference of Position Change of Sesamoid Bones During Active Abduction Exercise of Great Toe in Subjects with Hallux Valgus

  • Yun, Sung-Joon (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kang, Min-Hyeok (Department of Physical Therapy, Inje University) ;
  • Kim, Moon-Hwan (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2015.03.24
  • 심사 : 2015.04.19
  • 발행 : 2015.04.25

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of active abduction exercise of the great toe on the medial and lateral sesamoid bones in hallux valgus (HV) patients by measuring radiography. Methods: In this study 27 young subjects were separated into two groups (normal group and HV group). Two pictures were taken by radiography while maintaining resting and while holding maximal active abduction of the great toe in sitting position on an x-ray table. All radiographs were used to measure the distance of the medial and lateral sesamoid bone from the longitudinal axis of the first metatarsal bone, respectively. Paired t-test was used for analysis of the resting and active abduction exercise in groups. Independent t-test was used to evaluate statistical significance between normal group and HV group. The statistical significance level was p<0.05. Results: In active abduction exercise of the normal group, distance of the medial and lateral sesamoid bones was not significantly different compared to resting condition. In active abduction exercise of the HV group, change of distance of the medial and lateral sesamoid bones showed statistically significant difference compared to resting condition. The distance between the medial sesamoid bone showed a more significant decrease in the HV vs. normal group, while the distance between the lateral sesamoid bone was significantly greater in the HV vs. normal group. Conclusion: These findings suggest that active abduction exercises, to reduce or prevent deterioration of the HV angle, should be considered for sesamoid bone displacement to improve muscle balance in the great toe.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Suwannahoy P, Srisuwan T, Pattamapaspong N, et al. Intra-articular ossicle in interphalangeal joint of the great toe and clinical implication. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012;34(1):39-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0830-x
  2. Thomson SA. Hallux varus and metatarsus varus: a five-year study (1954-1958). Clin Orthop. 1960;16:109-18.
  3. Martin BF. Observations on the muscles and tendons of the medial aspect of the sole of the foot. J Anat. 1964;98:437-53.
  4. Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo R, Losa Iglesias ME, Jules KT. Tendon insertion at the base of the proximal phalanx of the hallux: surgical implications. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51(6):729-33. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2012.06.004
  5. Donatelli RA. The Biomechanics of the Foot and Ankle. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, F. A. Davis Company, 1996:26-31.
  6. Huang EH, Charlton TP, Ajayi S, et al. Effect of various hallux valgus reconstruction on sesamoid location: a radiographic study. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(1):99-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100712464356
  7. Shereff MJ, Bejjani FJ, Kummer FJ. Kinematics of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(3):392-8. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198668030-00012
  8. Dufour AB, Casey VA, Golightly YM, et al. Characteristics Associated with Hallux Valgus in a Population-Based Study of Older Adults: The Framingham Foot Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66(12): 1880-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22391
  9. Munuera PV, Polo J, Rebollo J.: Length of the first metatarsal and hallux in hallux valgus in the initial stage. Int Orthop. 2008;32(4):489-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0350-9
  10. D'Arcangelo PR, Landorf KB, Munteanu SE, et al. Radiographic correlates of hallux valgus severity in older people. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;3:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-3-20
  11. Pique-Vidal C, Sole MT, Antich J. Hallux valgus inheritance: Pedigree research in 350 patients with bunion deformity. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007; 46(3):149-54. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2006.10.011
  12. Klein C, Groll-Knapp E, Kundi M, et al. Increased hallux angle in children and its association with insufficient length of footwear: a community based cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009; 10:159. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-159
  13. Arinci Incel N, Genc H, Erdem HR, et al. Muscle imbalance in hallux valgus: an electromyographic study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(5): 345-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PHM.0000064718.24109.26
  14. Iida M, Basmajian JV. Electromyography of hallux valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974;(101):220-4
  15. Kim MH, Koh EK, Jung DY. Analysis of kinematic motions of first metatarsophalangeal joint during electrical stimulation of abductor hallucis muscle in subjects with hallux valgus. J Kor Phys Ther. 2012;24(4): 276-81
  16. Kang SY, Choung SD, Kim MH, et al. Relationship between angle of metatarsophalangeal joint and abductor hallucis in hallux valgus. J Kor Phys Ther. 2014;26(2):56-61.
  17. Groiso JA: Juvenile hallux valgus. A conservative approach to treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1992;74(9):1367-74. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199274090-00010
  18. Bayar B, Erel S, Simsek, IE, et al. The effects of taping and foot exercises on patients with hallux valgus: A preliminary study. Turk J Med Sci. 2011;41(3):403-9.
  19. Choi GH, Park KY, Byun SJ, et al. Study on Angular Correlation between Hallux Valgus and 1st MPJ Dorsi-flexion according to Work Type and Age of Woman. J Kor Phys Ther. 2011;23(5):57-63. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.23.57
  20. Srivastava S, Chockalingam N, El Fakhri T. Radiographic measurements of hallux angles: A review of current techniques. Foot (Edinb). 2010;20(1):27-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2009.12.002
  21. Cralley JC, McGonagle W, Fitch K. The role of adductor hallucis in bunion deformity (Part II). J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1978;68(7):473-83. https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-68-7-473
  22. Hetherington VJ: Hallux Valgus and Forefoot Surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1994:42-54.
  23. Grode SE, McCarthy DJ. The anatomical implications of hallux abducto valgus: a cryomicrotomy study. J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1980;70(11):539-51. https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-70-11-539
  24. Srivastava S, Chockalingam N, El Fakhri T. Radiographic measurements of hallux angles: A review of current techniques. Foot (Edinb). 2010b; 20(1):27-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2009.12.002
  25. Lee IH, Park HJ, Jin JS, et al. comparison of radiography findings and magnetic resonance image findings of lumbar spine instability patients. J Kor Phys Ther. 2007;19(3):41-6. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.19.41