The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy

The Korean Society of Physical Therapy (대한물리치료학회)
권호 표지

The Comparison of 'Knowledge of Result' and 'Knowledge of Performance' in the Children with Cerebral Palsy

  • Lee, Hye-Young (Department of Physical Therapy, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, In-Hee (Department of Physical Therapy, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center)
  • Received : 2015.03.24
  • Accepted : 2015.04.21
  • Published : 2015.04.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of 'knowledge of result' and 'knowledge of performance', two types of extrinsic feedbacks, during the sit-to-stand movement in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Methods: A total of ten children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (ages 8 to 12 years) were recruited for the study. Subjects with hemiplegic cerebral palsy performed sit-to-stand movement in front of a mirror. Their performance was supervised and revised for normal movement by a pediatric physiotherapist. In the knowledge of the result, subjects performed sit-to-stand using a chair with an armrest in their mind with normal movement. In the knowledge of performance, subjects performed sit-to-stand under verbal instructions. Randomized cross over trials were used in this study. Main outcome measurements were as follows: mediolateral speed, anteroposterior speed, velocity moment, extent in mediolateral direction, extent in anteroposterior direction, and vertical distance of the center of pressure. Results: The mediolateral speed and extent of center of pressure was higher for 'knowledge of performance' in comparison with the other type of extrinsic feedbacks (p<0.05). The other parameters, including anteroposterior speed and extent, and vertical speed of the center of pressure, did not differ between the two types of extrinsic feedbacks (p>0.05). Conclusion: These findings suggested that training in sit-to-stand movement with 'knowledge of result' may result in better use of extrinsic feedback.

Keywords

References

  1. 2007 korean national growth charts : Review of developmental process and outlook. 2014.
  2. Pin TW. Effectiveness of static weight-bearing exercises in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2007;19(1):62-73. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e3180302111
  3. Goodman CC, Fuller KS. Pathology: Implications for the physical therapist. 4th ed. In: Glanzman AM, eds, Cerebral palsy, USA, Elsevier Health Sciences, 2014:1576.
  4. Pavao SL, Dos Santos AN, de Oliveira AB et al. Functionality level and its relation to postural control during sitting-to-stand movement in children with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(2):506-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.11.028
  5. de Graaf-Peters VB, Blauw-Hospers CH, Dirks T, et al. Development of postural control in typically developing children and children with cerebral palsy: Possibilities for intervention? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007;31(8):1191-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.04.008
  6. Seo HJ, Kim JH, Choi MJ, et al. The effect of gluteal taping on posture and balance during standing in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. J Kor Phys Ther. 2014;26(5):308-14.
  7. Yeom JN, Lim CG. Change of static and dynamic foot pressure after trunk stabilization exercises in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. J Kor Phys Ther. 2014;26(4):274-9.
  8. Kwon YH, Lee MH. Effects of massed and distributed practice on p300 latency in a sequential timing task. J Kor Phys Ther. 2014;26(4):234-9.
  9. Kwon YH, Lee MH. Comparison of motor skill acquisition according to types of sensory-stimuli cue in serial reaction time task. J Kor Phys Ther. 2014;26(3):191-5. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.191
  10. van Vliet PM, Wulf G. Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: What is the evidence? Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(13-14):831-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500534937
  11. Magill RA, Anderson D. Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications. 11th ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2007:393-403.
  12. Solmon MA, Boone J. The impact of student goal orientation in physical education classes. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1993;64(4):418-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1993.10607595
  13. Cirstea CM, Ptito A, Levin MF. Feedback and cognition in arm motor skill reacquisition after stroke. Stroke. 2006;37(5):1237-46. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000217417.89347.63
  14. Fasoli SE, Tromly CA, Ticle-Degned L, et al. Effects of instructions on functional reach in pers with and without cerevrovascular accident. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56(4):380-90. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.4.380
  15. Thorpe DE, Valvano J. The effects of knowledge of performance and cognitive strategies on motor skill learning in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2002;14(1):2-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001577-200214010-00002
  16. Weeks DL, Kordus RN. Relative frequency of knowledge of performance and motor skill learning. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1998;69(3):224-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1998.10607689
  17. Lai Q, Shea CH. Bandwidth knowledge of results enhances generalized motor program learning. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1999;70(1):79-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1999.10607734
  18. Winstein CJ, Schmidt RA. Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990; 16(4):677. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.677
  19. Levitt S. Treatment of cerebral palsy and motor delay. 4th ed. Oxford, John Wiley & Sons, 2013:15-33,76-85.
  20. Ford P, Hodges NJ, Williams AM. Examining action effects in the execution of a skilled soccer kick by using erroneous feedback. J Mot Behav. 2007;39(6):481-90. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.39.6.481-490
  21. Buekers MJ, Magill RA, Hall KG. The effect of erroneous knowledge of results on skill acquisition when augmented information is redundant. Q J Exp Psychol. 1992;44(1):105-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749208401285