The Journal of the Korea Contents Association (한국콘텐츠학회논문지)

The Korea Contents Association (한국콘텐츠학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improvements about the Opposing Power of Tenant on the Housing Lease Protection Act

주택임대차보호법상 임차인의 대항력에 관한 개선 방안

  • 박종렬 (광주여자대학교 경찰법학과)
  • Received : 2015.03.09
  • Accepted : 2015.04.14
  • Published : 2015.07.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Korean Housing Lease Act is special law of Civil Code and was enacted from March 5, 1981 as Law No. 3379 to guarantee the stability of residential life. And until January 6, 2015 there were 15 times revisions to protect the right of homeless people. However, it is true that many problems are exposed from enforcement. Because the processing without sufficient review of legislation. and it was enacted very quickly, so, at the part of opposing power that the Article 3 Paragraph 1 "if the housing tenant was delivered rental housing and finish the resident registration, from the day after even if the owner of the house was changed as third party tenant can resist with lease right". In addition, this provision made housing problems of the socially disadvantaged more seriously and the country did not made any way to protect this problems so many issues have been raised and a lot of disputes relating to Housing Lease. Therefore, in this paper derives a problem about opposing power of the Housing Lease Act for tenants of residential stability, and through the foreign legislation case, it propose the improvement to contribute to the residential stability realistically.

우리나라 주택임대차보호법은 민법의 특별법으로 국민의 주거생활의 안정을 보장하기 위하여 1981년 3월 5일 법률 제3379호로 제정된 이후 지금까지 15차례의 개정을 통하여 유래를 찾아볼 수 없을 정도로 무주택영세민의 권익보호에 앞장서 왔다. 그러나 급히 서둘러 만든 입법이어서 법조문 제3조 제1항 "주택임차인이 임차주택을 인도받고 주민등록까지 마치면 그 다음날부터 그 주택의 소유자가 제3자로 변경되더라도 그 제3자에 대하여 임차권을 가지고서 대항할 수 있다"는 대항력 부분에 있어서 시행 당초부터 무주택영세민의 보호취지에 역행한다는 문제점이 노출되었던 것이 사실이다. 또한 이 조항이 오히려 사회적 약자들의 주거문제를 더욱 심각하게 만들었고, 국가는 이에 대한 대책이나 보호방법을 현실에 맞추어 개정하지 못한 이유로 지금까지 다양한 문제들이 제기되어 주택임대차와 관련된 분쟁들이 많이 발생되고 있다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 임차인의 주거안정을 위하여 주택임대차보호법의 대항력에 대한 문제점을 도출하고, 외국입법례를 통하여 주택임차인들에게 현실적으로 주거안정에 기여할 수 있는 개선방안을 제시하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Statistics Korea, Statistics by topic(housing supply rate), 2013, http://kosis.kr/
  2. Y. J. Gwak, Detailed exposition of Bonds, Parkyeongsa, p.86, 2004.
  3. H. D. Kim and J. H. Kim, Detailed exposition of Bonds, Parkyeongsa, p.80, 2006.
  4. H. Sun, A Study on the Problems of the Real Estate Tenant Protection System and Their Solutions, Hanyang University Administration & Local Autonomy, p.9, 2009.
  5. Supreme court precedents, 1997.12.12. 97da 22395.
  6. I. Y. Min, "Claim to Return Deposit for Lease to a Transferrer of Rental housing," Parkyoungsa, Civil Case Study(IX), p.104, 1987.
  7. Y. S. Yim, A Study on the Protection of Housing Lessees, Ph.D Thesis, Kyungwon University, p.137, 2006.
  8. M. J. Oh, A Study on the Protection System for Residential Lessee and the Direction for Improvement of It, Master's Thesis, Jeju National University, p.4, 2012.
  9. B. J. Lee, "Opposing power of Housing Lease," On-San, Soon-Won Bang, To celebrate the age of seventy paper, Parkyoungsa, p.172, 1984.
  10. C. H. Ryu, Study on the Housing Lease Protection Act, Ph.D Thesis, Dongeui University, p.32, 2005.
  11. Y. Lee, A Study on the Improvement of the Housing Lease Protection Law for Lessee's Housing Stability, Master's Thesis, Chungbuk National University, p.18, 2012.
  12. J. S. So, "Structures and Characteristics of the Real estate Leasing, Agents and Association on the Real Estate Law in France," Korean Public Land Law Association, Land Law Studies Vol.40, p.503, 2008.
  13. H. S. Kim, Resolution of Housing Lease Disputes, Beopryul-seowon, p.75, 2005.
  14. Y. J. Gwak, Law of Obligations Study, Parkyoungsa, p.228, 2007.
  15. J. R. Park, Korean Reality Law, Jiseonggye, p.53, 2013.
  16. D. S. Song, Reality Law, Parkyoungsa, p.193, 2012.
  17. J. H. Kim, Reality Law, Beopmunsa, p.201, 2012.
  18. S. R. Ko, "The Problems of Revised Law Among the 3rd revision of the Housing Lease Protection Act," Korean Association of Civil Law, 1998 Fall Conference, p.9, 1998.
  19. Supreme court precedents, 1987.1.26. 87daka14
  20. Supreme court precedents, 1987.2.24. 86daka1695
  21. C. H. Yoon, "Issues Related to Loss of Housing Lease Opposing power," Legal News, p.15, 2009. 6. 10.
  22. Supreme court precedents, 1989.1.17. 88daka143
  23. Supreme court precedents, 1999.5.25. 99da9981
  24. E. H. Lee, "The Resident Registration of Housing Lease as Method of Public Notice," Gwanaksa, Democratic Legal studies, No.20, p.230, 2001.
  25. W. J. Lee, "The opposing power of Housing Lease Right, The problems of the civil trial," Civil Practice Society, Vol.3, p.37, 1985.
  26. J. R. Park, "Improvements for the Problem of Housing Lease Protection Act Article 3-3," Korea Contents Association, Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Vol.12, No.8, p.201, 2012.
  27. G. Y. So, "The Opposing Power on the Housing Lease Protection Act," Korea Law Association, Legal Studies, Vol.33, p.92, 2009.
  28. Supreme court precedents, 1998.9.8. 98da26002
  29. Y. S. Yim and W. H. Choi, A Study on comparative law for preserve leaseholder, Seoil University, Journal of Seoil University, Vol.24, p.182, 2006.
  30. Supreme court precedents, 1997.12.12. 97da22393